Levesque Jean-Frederic, Harris Mark F, Scott Cathie, Crabtree Benjamin, Miller William, Halma Lisa M, Hogg William E, Weenink Jan-Willem, Advocat Jenny R, Gunn Jane, Russell Grant
Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales Australia, Sydney, Australia.
Agency for Clinical Innovation, Chatswood, Australia.
Fam Pract. 2018 May 23;35(3):285-294. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmx103.
Inter-professional teamwork in primary care settings offers potential benefits for responding to the increasing complexity of patients' needs. While it is a central element in many reforms to primary care delivery, implementing inter-professional teamwork has proven to be more challenging than anticipated.
The objective of this study was to better understand the dimensions and intensity of teamwork and the developmental process involved in creating fully integrated teams.
Secondary analyses of qualitative and quantitative data from completed studies conducted in Australia, Canada and USA. Case studies and matrices were used, along with face-to-face group retreats, using a Collaborative Reflexive Deliberative Approach.
Four dimensions of teamwork were identified. The structural dimension relates to human resources and mechanisms implemented to create the foundations for teamwork. The operational dimension relates to the activities and programs conducted as part of the team's production of services. The relational dimension relates to the relationships and interactions occurring in the team. Finally, the functional dimension relates to definitions of roles and responsibilities aimed at coordinating the team's activities as well as to the shared vision, objectives and developmental activities aimed at ensuring the long-term cohesion of the team. There was a high degree of variation in the way the dimensions were addressed by reforms across the national contexts.
The framework enables a clearer understanding of the incremental and iterative aspects that relate to higher achievement of teamwork. Future reforms of primary care need to address higher-level dimensions of teamwork to achieve its expected outcomes.
基层医疗环境中的跨专业团队合作对于应对患者日益复杂的需求具有潜在益处。虽然它是许多基层医疗服务改革的核心要素,但事实证明,实施跨专业团队合作比预期更具挑战性。
本研究的目的是更好地理解团队合作的维度和强度以及创建完全整合团队所涉及的发展过程。
对在澳大利亚、加拿大和美国完成的研究中的定性和定量数据进行二次分析。采用协作反思审议方法,使用案例研究和矩阵,以及面对面的小组务虚会。
确定了团队合作的四个维度。结构维度涉及为团队合作奠定基础而实施的人力资源和机制。运营维度涉及作为团队服务生产一部分开展的活动和项目。关系维度涉及团队中发生的关系和互动。最后,功能维度涉及旨在协调团队活动的角色和职责定义,以及旨在确保团队长期凝聚力的共同愿景、目标和发展活动。各国改革处理这些维度的方式存在很大差异。
该框架能够更清晰地理解与更高水平的团队合作成就相关的渐进性和迭代性方面。未来的基层医疗改革需要解决团队合作的更高层次维度,以实现预期成果。