• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

48个月及以上儿童中内镜辅助探查与传统探查的成功率比较

Success Rates of Endoscopic-Assisted Probing Compared to Conventional Probing in Children 48 Months or Older.

作者信息

Galindo-Ferreiro Alicia, Khandekar Rajiv, Akaishi Patricia Mitiko, Cruz Augusto, Gálvez-Ruiz Alberto, Dolmetsch Angela, Schellini Silvana

机构信息

a Department of Ophthalmology , Rio Hortega University Hospital , Valladolid , Spain.

b Department of Ophthalmology , King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital , Riyadh , Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Semin Ophthalmol. 2018;33(3):435-442. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2017.1284872. Epub 2017 Feb 16.

DOI:10.1080/08820538.2017.1284872
PMID:29069710
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the success rates of endoscopic-assisted probing compared to conventional probing in children 48 months or older.

METHODS

This retrospective study included children 48 months and older with CNLDO who underwent endoscopic-assisted probing or conventional probing between January 2011 to August 2015 at a tertiary eye care hospital in central Saudi Arabia. Probing was considered successful when signals of tearing or discharge disappeared and fluorescein dye disappearance test (FDDT) was normal. Demographic data, clinical features, intraoperative and postoperative variables were correlated to the success rate.

RESULTS

One hundred and twelve children with CNLDO undergoing endoscopic-assisted (37 patients) or conventional (75 patients) probing were included. The success rates of endoscopic-assisted and conventional probing were 94.6% [95% confidence interval (CI): 89.5-99.7] and 58.7% [95% (CI): 47.6-69.8], respectively. The success rate was higher with endoscopic probing, especially in older children.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic-assisted probing can achieve better outcomes to treat CNLDO, even in older children. The significantly higher success rates with endoscopic probing are likely due to the ability to observe and treat associated problems.

摘要

背景

评估48个月及以上儿童中,与传统探通术相比,内镜辅助探通术的成功率。

方法

这项回顾性研究纳入了2011年1月至2015年8月期间在沙特阿拉伯中部一家三级眼科护理医院接受内镜辅助探通术或传统探通术的48个月及以上患有先天性鼻泪管阻塞(CNLDO)的儿童。当流泪或分泌物信号消失且荧光素染料消失试验(FDDT)正常时,探通术被认为成功。人口统计学数据、临床特征、术中及术后变量与成功率相关。

结果

纳入了112例接受内镜辅助探通术(37例患者)或传统探通术(75例患者)的CNLDO患儿。内镜辅助探通术和传统探通术的成功率分别为94.6% [95%置信区间(CI):89.5 - 99.7]和58.7% [95%(CI):47.6 - 69.8]。内镜探通术的成功率更高,尤其是在年龄较大的儿童中。

结论

内镜辅助探通术在治疗CNLDO方面可取得更好的效果,即使是在年龄较大的儿童中。内镜探通术成功率显著更高可能是由于能够观察和治疗相关问题。

相似文献

1
Success Rates of Endoscopic-Assisted Probing Compared to Conventional Probing in Children 48 Months or Older.48个月及以上儿童中内镜辅助探查与传统探查的成功率比较
Semin Ophthalmol. 2018;33(3):435-442. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2017.1284872. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
2
Success Rates of Conventional Versus Endoscope-Assisted Probing for Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction in Children 12 Years and Younger.12岁及以下儿童先天性鼻泪管阻塞常规探查与内镜辅助探查的成功率
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2016 Sep 1;53(5):292-9. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20160610-02. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
3
A comparison of the success rates of endoscopic-assisted probing in the treatment of membranous congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction between younger and older children and its correlation with the thickness of the membrane at the Valve of Hasner.年龄较小与较大儿童在内镜辅助探通治疗先天性膜性鼻泪管阻塞中的成功率比较及其与泪小点瓣膜处膜厚度的相关性
Orbit. 2018 Aug;37(4):257-261. doi: 10.1080/01676830.2017.1383483. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
4
Topical mitomycin in endoscopic-assisted probing for the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in older children.局部应用丝裂霉素在内镜辅助探查中治疗大龄儿童先天性鼻泪管阻塞
Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2020 Jun;83(3):229-235. doi: 10.5935/0004-2749.20200062. Epub 2020 May 29.
5
Nasal endoscopic features and outcomes of nasal endoscopy guided bicanalicular intubation for complex persistent congenital nasolacrimal duct obstructions.鼻内窥镜下双鼻内管插管治疗复杂持续性先天性鼻泪管阻塞的鼻内窥镜特征和结果。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2019 Jul;67(7):1137-1142. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1819_18.
6
Endoscopic-assisted probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.内镜辅助探查先天性鼻泪管阻塞
Eye (Lond). 2006 Sep;20(9):998-1003. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6702049. Epub 2005 Sep 2.
7
Success Rate of Probing for Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction in Children.儿童先天性鼻泪管阻塞探通术的成功率
Folia Med (Plovdiv). 2019 Mar 1;61(1):97-103. doi: 10.2478/folmed-2018-0054.
8
Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction update study (CUP study): Paper II - Profile and outcomes of complex CNLDO and masquerades.先天性鼻泪管阻塞更新研究(CUP 研究):论文二——复杂先天性鼻泪管阻塞和伪装疾病的特征和结局。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Dec;139:110407. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110407. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
9
Direct endoscopic probing for congenital lacrimal duct obstruction.直接内镜探查先天性泪道阻塞。
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013 Nov;41(8):729-34. doi: 10.1111/ceo.12108. Epub 2013 Apr 29.
10
A Novel One-Stage Obstruction-Based Endoscopic Approach to Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction.一种基于阻塞的新型一期内镜治疗先天性鼻泪管阻塞方法。
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Sep/Oct;33(5):350-354. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000000788.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnosing and treating epiphora in the 21st century.21世纪的泪溢诊断与治疗。
Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2024 Sep 13;87(5):e20240099. doi: 10.5935/0004-2749.2024-0099. eCollection 2024.
2
Effect of age on primary balloon dacryocystoplasty and probing success in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.年龄对先天性鼻泪管阻塞行初次球囊扩张术和探通术成功的影响。
Int Ophthalmol. 2022 Nov;42(11):3547-3554. doi: 10.1007/s10792-022-02353-y. Epub 2022 May 22.
3
Outcomes of Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction Surgery Converted into Balloon Dilation and Silicone Intubation due to Probing Difficulty.
因探通困难而转换为球囊扩张和硅胶插管的先天性鼻泪管阻塞手术的结果
J Ophthalmol. 2022 Mar 12;2022:4045789. doi: 10.1155/2022/4045789. eCollection 2022.
4
Management of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction: results of a national survey of paediatric and oculoplastic ophthalmologists.先天性鼻泪管阻塞的管理:儿科和眼整形眼科医生全国调查的结果。
Eye (Lond). 2021 Jul;35(7):1930-1936. doi: 10.1038/s41433-020-01183-5. Epub 2020 Sep 16.