Suppr超能文献

[评估nCD64和CD14指数作为血液肿瘤合并细菌感染诊断标志物的研究]

[Evaluation of nCD64 and CD14 Index as Diagnostic Markers for Hematologic Tumors Combined with Bacterial Infection].

作者信息

Ma Yuan-Yuan, Saiyin Qimuge

机构信息

Graduate School of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot 010000, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China.

Department of Hemopathology, Central Hospital of Ordos, Ordos 017000, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China. E-mail:

出版信息

Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2017 Oct;25(5):1566-1570. doi: 10.7534/j.issn.1009-2137.2017.05.050.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the value of both CD64(nCD64 IND) and CD14 (CD14 IND) Index of peripheral blood neutrophils as the diagnostic markers of hematologic tumors combined with bacterial infection.

METHODS

Sixty-four patients with hematological tumors were selected and divided into the group complicated with bacterial infection (infection group, 33 cases) and the non-infection group (31 cases), the flow cytometry was be used to detect the related peripheral blood markers CD64 and CD14, the nCD64 IND and CD14 IND were calculated, and the peripheral blood WBC count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were determined at the same time.

RESULTS

The differences of nCD64 IND and CRP between these 2 groups were statistically significant (P<0.05), however, the differences of CD14IND, ESR and WBC between these 2 groups were not statistically significant(P>0.05). The receiver operating curves (ROC) were drawn by using the data of all indictors in the 2 groups, and the order of the area under the curve(AUC) from big to small size was as follows: nCD64IND(0.974)>CRP(0.786)>ESR(0.675)>WBC(0.598)>CD14IND(0.556). The AUC of nCD64IND, CRP and ESR were statistically significantly different from the standard area of 0.5(P<0.05), while the AUC of CD14 IND,WBC were not statistically significantly different from the standard area of 0.5(P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

nCD64 possesses a high diagnostic value for hematologic tumors with bacterial infection, it's sensitivity and specificity both are higher than that of CRP and ESR.

摘要

目的

探讨外周血中性粒细胞的CD64(nCD64指数)和CD14(CD14指数)作为血液系统肿瘤合并细菌感染诊断标志物的价值。

方法

选取64例血液系统肿瘤患者,分为合并细菌感染组(感染组,33例)和非感染组(31例),采用流式细胞术检测外周血相关标志物CD64和CD14,计算nCD64指数和CD14指数,同时检测外周血白细胞计数、红细胞沉降率(ESR)和C反应蛋白(CRP)。

结果

两组间nCD64指数和CRP差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),而两组间CD14指数、ESR和白细胞差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。利用两组所有指标数据绘制受试者工作特征曲线(ROC),曲线下面积(AUC)从大到小依次为:nCD64指数(0.974)>CRP(0.786)>ESR(0.675)>白细胞(0.598)>CD14指数(0.556)。nCD64指数、CRP和ESR的AUC与标准面积0.5差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),而CD14指数、白细胞的AUC与标准面积0.5差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

nCD64对合并细菌感染的血液系统肿瘤具有较高诊断价值,其敏感性和特异性均高于CRP和ESR。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验