Suppr超能文献

评价氨甲环酸的军事用途及相关的血栓栓塞事件。

Evaluation of Military Use of Tranexamic Acid and Associated Thromboembolic Events.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland.

Surgical Critical Care Initiative, Bethesda, Maryland.

出版信息

JAMA Surg. 2018 Feb 1;153(2):169-175. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.3821.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Since publication of the CRASH-2 and MATTERs studies, the US military has included tranexamic acid (TXA) in clinical practice guidelines. While TXA was shown to decrease mortality in trauma patients requiring massive transfusion, improper administration and increased risk of venous thromboembolism remain a concern.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the appropriateness of TXA administration by US military medical personnel based on current Joint Trauma System clinical practice guidelines and to determine if TXA administration is associated with venous thromboembolism.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study of US military casualties in US military combat support hospitals in Afghanistan and a single US-based tertiary military treatment facility within the continental United States was conducted from 2011 to 2015, with follow-up through initial hospitalization and readmissions.

EXPOSURES

Data collected for all patients included demographic information as well as Injury Severity Score; receipt of blood products, TXA, and/or a massive transfusion; and admission hemodynamics.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Variance from guidelines in TXA administration and venous thromboembolism. Tranexamic acid overuse was defined as a hemodynamically stable patient receiving TXA but not a massive transfusion, underuse was defined as a patient receiving a massive transfusion but not TXA, and TXA administration was considered delayed when given more than 3 hours after injury.

RESULTS

Of the 455 identified patients, 443 (97.4%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 25.3 (4.8) years. A total of 173 patients (38.0%) received a massive transfusion, and 139 (30.5%) received TXA in theater. Overuse occurred in 18 of 282 patients (6.4%) and underuse in 46 of 173 (26.6%) receiving massive transfusions, and delayed administration was found in 6 of 145 patients (4.3%) receiving TXA. Overuse increased at 3.3% per quarter (95% CI, 4.0-9.9; P < .001; R2 = 0.340) and underuse decreased at -4.4% per quarter (95% CI, -4.5 to -3.6; P < .001; R2 = 0.410). Tranexamic acid administration was an independent risk factor for venous thromboembolism (odds ratio, 2.58; 95% CI, 1.20-5.56; P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Military medical personnel decreased missed opportunities to appropriately use TXA but also increased overuse. In addition, TXA administration was an independent risk factor for venous thromboembolism. A reevaluation of the use of TXA in combat casualties should be undertaken.

摘要

重要性

自 CRASH-2 和 MATTERs 研究发表以来,美国军方已将氨甲环酸(TXA)纳入临床实践指南。虽然 TXA 已被证明可降低需要大量输血的创伤患者的死亡率,但给药不当和静脉血栓栓塞风险增加仍然令人担忧。

目的

根据当前的联合创伤系统临床实践指南,确定美国军方医务人员使用 TXA 的适当性,并确定 TXA 的使用是否与静脉血栓栓塞有关。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项对 2011 年至 2015 年期间在阿富汗的美国军事作战支援医院和美国大陆上的一家单一的美国三级军事治疗机构的美国军事伤员的队列研究,随访至首次住院和再次入院。

暴露

为所有患者收集的数据包括人口统计学信息以及损伤严重程度评分;接受血液制品、TXA 和/或大量输血;以及入院时的血液动力学。

主要结果和措施

TXA 给药和静脉血栓栓塞的指南偏差。血流动力学稳定的患者接受 TXA 但未接受大量输血定义为过度使用,接受大量输血但未接受 TXA 定义为使用不足,TXA 给药超过受伤后 3 小时被认为是延迟。

结果

在确定的 455 名患者中,443 名(97.4%)为男性,平均(SD)年龄为 25.3(4.8)岁。共有 173 名患者(38.0%)接受了大量输血,139 名(30.5%)在现场接受了 TXA。过度使用发生在 282 名患者中的 18 名(6.4%),在接受大量输血的 173 名患者中的 46 名(26.6%)中出现了不足,在接受 TXA 的 145 名患者中的 6 名(4.3%)中出现了延迟。每季度过度使用率增加 3.3%(95%CI,4.0-9.9;P<0.001;R2=0.340),每季度使用率减少 4.4%(95%CI,-4.5 至-3.6;P<0.001;R2=0.410)。TXA 给药是静脉血栓栓塞的独立危险因素(比值比,2.58;95%CI,1.20-5.56;P=0.02)。

结论和相关性

军事医务人员减少了适当使用 TXA 的机会,但也增加了过度使用的机会。此外,TXA 给药是静脉血栓栓塞的独立危险因素。应该对 TXA 在战斗伤员中的使用进行重新评估。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
Tranexamic acid for major trauma patients in Ireland.氨甲环酸用于爱尔兰的重大创伤患者。
World J Emerg Med. 2022;13(1):11-17. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2022.003.
5
Challenging Traditional Paradigms in Posttraumatic Pulmonary Thromboembolism.挑战创伤后肺血栓栓塞症的传统观念。
JAMA Surg. 2022 Feb 1;157(2):e216356. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.6356. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
7
Clinical use of tranexamic acid: evidences and controversies.氨甲环酸的临床应用:证据与争议。
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2022 Nov-Dec;72(6):795-812. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2021.08.022. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
8
Disorders of Fibrinogen and Fibrinolysis.纤维蛋白原和纤维蛋白溶解紊乱。
Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2021 Dec;35(6):1197-1217. doi: 10.1016/j.hoc.2021.07.011. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
10
Oral tranexamic acid and thrombosis risk in women.女性口服氨甲环酸与血栓形成风险
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 May 6;35:100882. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100882. eCollection 2021 May.

本文引用的文献

4
Venous thromboembolism during combat operations: a 10-y review.战斗行动期间的静脉血栓栓塞症:10 年回顾。
J Surg Res. 2014 Apr;187(2):625-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.11.008. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
5
The context of antibiotic overuse.抗生素过度使用的背景。
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Aug 7;157(3):211-2. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-3-201208070-00013.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验