• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Tranexamic acid for major trauma patients in Ireland.氨甲环酸用于爱尔兰的重大创伤患者。
World J Emerg Med. 2022;13(1):11-17. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2022.003.
2
Safety and Efficacy of Hospital Utilization of Tranexamic Acid in Civilian Adult Trauma Resuscitation.氨甲环酸在成年平民创伤复苏医院应用中的安全性和有效性
West J Emerg Med. 2020 Feb 21;21(2):217-225. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2019.10.43055.
3
Development and validation of a prognostic model to predict death in patients with traumatic bleeding, and evaluation of the effect of tranexamic acid on mortality according to baseline risk: a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.创伤性出血患者死亡预测预后模型的建立和验证,以及根据基线风险评估氨甲环酸对死亡率影响的评价:一项随机对照试验的二次分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2013 Jun;17(24):1-45, v-vi. doi: 10.3310/hta17240.
4
Tranexamic Acid in Civilian Trauma Care in the California Prehospital Antifibrinolytic Therapy Study.氨甲环酸在加利福尼亚院前抗纤维蛋白溶解治疗研究中的民用创伤护理。
West J Emerg Med. 2018 Nov;19(6):977-986. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2018.8.39336. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
5
Does Liberal Prehospital and In-Hospital Tranexamic Acid Influence Outcome in Severely Injured Patients? A Prospective Cohort Study.自由使用院前和院内氨甲环酸是否影响严重创伤患者的结局?一项前瞻性队列研究。
World J Surg. 2021 Aug;45(8):2398-2407. doi: 10.1007/s00268-021-06143-y. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
6
Tranexamic Acid Use in Prehospital Uncontrolled Hemorrhage.氨甲环酸在院前难治性出血中的应用
Wilderness Environ Med. 2017 Jun;28(2S):S50-S60. doi: 10.1016/j.wem.2016.12.006.
7
Use of tranexamic acid in major trauma: a sex-disaggregated analysis of the Clinical Randomisation of an Antifibrinolytic in Significant Haemorrhage (CRASH-2 and CRASH-3) trials and UK trauma registry (Trauma and Audit Research Network) data.氨甲环酸在重大创伤中的应用:对纤维蛋白溶解抑制剂在重大出血中的临床随机对照试验(CRASH-2 和 CRASH-3 试验)和英国创伤登记处(创伤和审核研究网络)数据的性别细分分析
Br J Anaesth. 2022 Aug;129(2):191-199. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.03.032. Epub 2022 May 18.
8
Mortality and Complication Rates in Adult Trauma Patients Receiving Tranexamic Acid: A Single-center Experience in the Post-CRASH-2 Era.成人创伤患者接受氨甲环酸治疗的死亡率和并发症发生率:CRASH-2 后时代的单中心经验。
Acad Emerg Med. 2020 May;27(5):358-365. doi: 10.1111/acem.13883. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
9
The impact of tranexamic acid on mortality in injured patients with hyperfibrinolysis.氨甲环酸对创伤后高纤溶患者死亡率的影响。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015 May;78(5):905-9; discussion 909-11. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000612.
10
Tranexamic acid use in severely injured civilian patients and the effects on outcomes: a prospective cohort study.氨甲环酸在严重创伤平民患者中的应用及其对结局的影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Ann Surg. 2015 Feb;261(2):390-4. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000717.

引用本文的文献

1
Coagulopathy as a predictor of the effectiveness of tranexamic acid in severe blunt trauma: a multicenter retrospective study.凝血功能障碍作为氨甲环酸治疗严重钝性创伤有效性的预测指标:一项多中心回顾性研究
Thromb J. 2025 Apr 22;23(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12959-025-00723-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Tranexamic Acid During Prehospital Transport in Patients at Risk for Hemorrhage After Injury: A Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Clinical Trial.创伤后出血风险患者院前转运期间使用氨甲环酸:一项双盲、安慰剂对照、随机临床试验
JAMA Surg. 2020 Oct 5;156(1):11-20. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.4350.
2
The Immunologic Effect of Early Intravenous Two and Four Gram Bolus Dosing of Tranexamic Acid Compared to Placebo in Patients With Severe Traumatic Bleeding (TAMPITI): A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Single-Center Trial.早期静脉注射 2 克和 4 克氨甲环酸与安慰剂治疗严重创伤性出血患者的免疫效果比较(TAMPITI):一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、单中心试验。
Front Immunol. 2020 Sep 8;11:2085. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.02085. eCollection 2020.
3
Outcome predictors for severely brain-injured patients directly admitted or transferred from emergency departments to a trauma center.直接从急诊科收治或转至创伤中心的重度脑损伤患者的预后预测因素。
World J Emerg Med. 2020;11(2):120-121. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2020.02.010.
4
Geographical Variance in the Use of Tranexamic Acid for Major Trauma Patients.创伤患者使用氨甲环酸的地域差异。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2019 Sep 2;55(9):561. doi: 10.3390/medicina55090561.
5
Changing the System - Major Trauma Patients and Their Outcomes in the NHS (England) 2008-17.变革体系——2008 - 2017年英国国民医疗服务体系(英格兰)中的重大创伤患者及其治疗结果
EClinicalMedicine. 2018 Aug 5;2-3:13-21. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2018.07.001. eCollection 2018 Aug-Sep.
6
Implementation of tranexamic acid for bleeding trauma patients: a longitudinal and cross-sectional study.氨甲环酸在出血创伤患者中的应用:一项纵向和横断面研究。
Emerg Med J. 2019 Feb;36(2):78-81. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2018-207693. Epub 2018 Dec 8.
7
Tranexamic acid administration is associated with an increased risk of posttraumatic venous thromboembolism.氨甲环酸的使用与创伤后静脉血栓栓塞风险增加相关。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019 Jan;86(1):20-27. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002061.
8
Injury mechanisms, patterns and outcomes of older polytrauma patients-An analysis of the Dutch Trauma Registry.老年多发伤患者的损伤机制、模式及结局——荷兰创伤登记处分析
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 5;13(1):e0190587. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190587. eCollection 2018.
9
Importance of respiratory rate for the prediction of clinical deterioration after emergency department discharge: a single-center, case-control study.呼吸频率对预测急诊科出院后临床病情恶化的重要性:一项单中心病例对照研究。
Acute Med Surg. 2016 Nov 10;4(2):172-178. doi: 10.1002/ams2.252. eCollection 2017 Apr.
10
Evaluation of Military Use of Tranexamic Acid and Associated Thromboembolic Events.评价氨甲环酸的军事用途及相关的血栓栓塞事件。
JAMA Surg. 2018 Feb 1;153(2):169-175. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.3821.

氨甲环酸用于爱尔兰的重大创伤患者。

Tranexamic acid for major trauma patients in Ireland.

作者信息

Walsh Kieran, O'Keeffe Francis, Brent Louise, Mitra Biswadev

机构信息

National Trauma Research Institute, the Alfred Hospital, Melbourne 3004, Australia.

Critical Care Research, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne 3004, Australia.

出版信息

World J Emerg Med. 2022;13(1):11-17. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2022.003.

DOI:10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2022.003
PMID:35003409
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8677917/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Clinical Randomisation of an Anti-fibrinolytic in Significant Hemorrhage-2 (CRASH-2) is the largest randomized control trial (RCT) examining circulatory resuscitation for trauma patients to date and concluded a statistically significant reduction in all-cause mortality in patients administered tranexamic acid (TXA) within 3 hours of injury. Since the publication of CRASH-2, significant geographical variance in the use of TXA for trauma patients exists. This study aims to assess TXA use for major trauma patients with hemorrhagic shock in Ireland after the publication of CRASH-2.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data derived from the Trauma Audit and Research Network (TARN). All injured patients in Ireland between January 2013 and December 2018 who had evidence of hemorrhagic shock on presentation (as defined by systolic blood pressure [SBP] <100 mmHg [1 mmHg=0.133 kPa] and administration of blood products) were eligible for inclusion. Death at hospital discharge was the primary outcome.

RESULTS

During the study period, a total of 234 patients met the inclusion criteria. Among injured patients presenting with hemorrhagic shock, 133 (56.8%; 95% confidence interval [] 50.2%-63.3%) received TXA. Of patients that received TXA, a higher proportion of patients presented with shock index >1 (70.68% vs.57.43%) and higher Injury Severity Score (ISS >25; 49.62% vs. 23.76%). Administration of TXA was not associated with mortality at hospital discharge (odds ratio [] 0.86, 95% 0.31-2.38).

CONCLUSIONS

Among injured Irish patients presenting with hemorrhagic shock, TXA was administered to 56.8% of patients. Patients administered with TXA were on average more severely injured. However, a mortality benefit could not be demonstrated.

摘要

背景

“重大出血中抗纤溶药物的临床随机试验-2(CRASH-2)”是迄今为止规模最大的一项针对创伤患者循环复苏的随机对照试验(RCT),该试验得出结论,在受伤后3小时内使用氨甲环酸(TXA)的患者全因死亡率在统计学上有显著降低。自CRASH-2发表以来,创伤患者使用TXA的情况在地域上存在显著差异。本研究旨在评估CRASH-2发表后爱尔兰严重创伤性出血性休克患者使用TXA的情况。

方法

采用来自创伤审计与研究网络(TARN)的数据进行回顾性队列研究。纳入2013年1月至2018年12月期间爱尔兰所有有出血性休克表现证据(定义为收缩压[SBP]<100 mmHg[1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa]且输注血液制品)的受伤患者。出院时死亡为主要结局。

结果

在研究期间,共有234例患者符合纳入标准。在出现出血性休克的受伤患者中,133例(56.8%;95%置信区间[50.2%-63.3%])接受了TXA。在接受TXA的患者中,休克指数>1的患者比例更高(70.68%对57.43%),损伤严重程度评分更高(损伤严重度评分[ISS]>25;49.62%对23.76%)。使用TXA与出院时死亡率无关(比值比[0.86,95% 0.31 - 2.38])。

结论

在爱尔兰出现出血性休克的受伤患者中,56.8%的患者使用了TXA。接受TXA治疗的患者平均受伤更严重。然而,未显示出死亡率获益。