1 Bruce Lefroy Centre, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
2 Physiotherapy Department, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Clin Rehabil. 2018 May;32(5):630-643. doi: 10.1177/0269215517736903. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
To determine the effectiveness of a six-week rehabilitation programme followed by a home exercise programme for Friedreich's ataxia.
Randomized, delayed-start control single-blind trial.
Outpatient rehabilitation centre.
Ambulant or non-ambulant individuals with Friedreich's ataxia.
Participants were randomized to a six-week outpatient rehabilitation programme, immediately (intervention group) or after a six-week delayed-start (control group). The rehabilitation was followed by a six-week home exercise programme.
The primary outcome was the Functional Independence Measure. Other measures included the Friedreich Ataxia Impact Scale and the Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale. Outcomes were administered at baseline, 6, 12 and 18 weeks.
Of 159 individuals screened, 92 were excluded and 48 declined to participate. A total of 19 participants were enrolled in the study. There was no significant difference in Functional Independence Measure change from baseline to six weeks in the intervention group (mean ± standard deviation, 2.00 ± 3.16) as compared to the control group (0.56 ± 4.06). Change in the Friedreich Ataxia Impact Scale body movement subscale indicated a significant improvement in health and well-being in the intervention group compared to the control group ( P = 0.003). Significant within-group improvements in the Friedreich Ataxia Impact Scale and the motor domain of the Functional Independence Measure post-rehabilitation were not sustained post-home exercise programme.
Our study indicates that rehabilitation can improve health and well-being in individuals with Friedreich's ataxia; however, a larger study is required to have sufficient power to detect a significant change in the most sensitive measure of function, the motor domain of the Functional Independence Measure.
确定弗里德里希共济失调的六周康复计划加家庭运动方案的有效性。
随机、延迟启动对照单盲试验。
门诊康复中心。
弗里德里希共济失调的可走动或不可走动的个体。
参与者随机分为六周门诊康复计划组(立即开始,干预组)或六周延迟启动对照组(控制组)。康复后进行六周家庭运动方案。
主要结局指标是功能独立性测量。其他指标包括弗里德里希共济失调影响量表和弗里德里希共济失调评定量表。在基线、6 周、12 周和 18 周进行评估。
在筛选的 159 人中,92 人被排除,48 人拒绝参加。共有 19 名参与者入组。与对照组(0.56 ± 4.06)相比,干预组从基线到 6 周时功能独立性测量的变化没有显著差异(平均值 ± 标准差,2.00 ± 3.16)。与对照组相比,弗里德里希共济失调影响量表身体运动子量表的变化表明干预组健康和幸福感有显著改善(P = 0.003)。康复后,弗里德里希共济失调影响量表和功能独立性测量的运动领域的组内显著改善在家庭运动方案后没有持续。
我们的研究表明,康复可以改善弗里德里希共济失调患者的健康和幸福感;然而,需要进行更大的研究才能有足够的效力来检测功能最敏感的测量,即功能独立性测量的运动领域的显著变化。