Body dysmorphic disorder: Latest neuroanatomical and neuropsychological findings.

Body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) is characterized by a preoccupation with a perceived defect or flaw in physical appearance that is not observable or appears slight to others. It leads to severe distress and functional impairment. Cognitive-behavioural and neurobiological similarities to obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) have led to its newly conceived classification as an obsessive compulsive related disorder (OCRD). In the process of investigating the neurobiology of BDD, neuroimaging and neuropsychological studies have been conducted. This review presents the most recent research findings and their connection with BDD clinical features. Imaging studies have shown increased total white matter volume and caudate volume asymmetry in BDD patients. These findings are consistent with the striatal topography model of OCRDs. Other studies have showed perfusion deficits in bilateral anterior-medial temporal and occipital regions and asymmetric perfusion in parietal lobes. In addition, correlation between symptom severity and left inferior frontal gyrus volume reflects the degree of detailed, analytic encoding that occurs on day-to-day basis when viewing others and themselves, and that likely underlies their symptoms. Finally, positive correlation between right amygdala volume and symptom severity signifies pathological fear circuitry engagement, hypervigilance and heightened sensitivity to social situations. Neuropsychological studies of BDD reveal deficits in strategic organization, learning and free recall after short and long delays. Executive function deficits are related to spatial working memory and subsequent thinking speed as well as impaired higher level planning ability. BDD patients' organizational strategies tend to focus on detail rather than on larger, global clustering features. They are characterized by abnormal visual processing of both details and global elements, inaccurate processing of global elements and reduced flexibility in switching visual attention between global and local features. Moreover, BDD patients seem to have deficits in identifying facial emotional expressions and they tend to misinterpret expressions of disgust (and others) as anger. Poor insight and ideas of reference, common in BDD, might be related to emotion recognition biases for angry expressions. These findings have been supplemented by combined neuroimaging and neuropsychological studies. Left hemisphere hyperactivity for low and normal spatial frequency face tasks and abnormal activation of the amygdala for high and low spatial frequency face tasks suggests detail encoding and analysis in BDD. Patients may primarily perceive details but they are impaired in their ability to contextualize them holistically.