Naidus Elliot L, Lasalvia Mary T, Marcantonio Edward R, Herzig Shoshana J
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA. elliot.naidus@ ucsf.edu.
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
J Hosp Med. 2018 Jan 1;13(1):34-37. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2868. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
The clinical predictors of positive sputum culture have not been previously reported in hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), and data on yield of sputum culture in this setting are scant. Current Infectious Disease Society of America guidelines for HAP recommend noninvasive sputum sampling, though the data for this practice are limited. We assessed the yield of sputum culture in HAP cases at an academic medical center from January 2007 to July 2013. HAP cases were identifi ed by International Classifi cation of Diseases, Ninth Revision-Clinical Modifi cation codes for bacterial pneumonia and all cases were validated by chart review. Our cohort had 1172 hospitalizations with a HAP diagnosis. At least 1 sputum specimen was collected noninvasively and sent for bacterial culture after hospital day 2 and within 7 days of HAP diagnosis in 344 of these hospitalizations (29.4%), with a total of 478 sputum specimens, yielding 63 (13.2%) positive, 109 (22.8%) negative, and 306 (64.0%) contaminated cultures (>10 epithelial cells per high power fi eld). Signifi cant predictors of a positive sputum culture were chronic lung disease (relative risk [RR] = 2.0; 95% confi dence interval [CI], 1.2-3.4) and steroid use (RR = 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1-3.2). The most commonly identifi ed organisms were Gram-negative rods not further speciated (25.9%), Staphylococcus aureus (21.0%), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (14.8%). Because of the ease of obtaining a sputum sample combined with the prevalence of commonly drug-resistant organisms, we suggest that sputum culture in HAP is a potentially useful noninvasive diagnostic technique.
痰液培养阳性的临床预测因素在医院获得性肺炎(HAP)中此前尚未见报道,且关于该情况下痰液培养阳性率的数据也很少。美国传染病学会目前关于HAP的指南推荐采用非侵入性痰液采样,不过这种做法的数据有限。我们评估了2007年1月至2013年7月在一家学术医疗中心的HAP病例中痰液培养的阳性率。HAP病例通过国际疾病分类第九版临床修订版中细菌性肺炎的编码来识别,所有病例均通过病历审查进行验证。我们的队列中有1172例住院患者被诊断为HAP。在其中344例住院患者(29.4%)中,在住院第2天之后且在HAP诊断后7天内至少非侵入性地采集了1份痰液标本并送去进行细菌培养,共采集了478份痰液标本,其中63份(13.2%)培养结果为阳性,109份(22.8%)为阴性,306份(64.0%)为污染培养物(每高倍视野上皮细胞>10个)。痰液培养阳性的显著预测因素为慢性肺病(相对危险度[RR]=2.0;95%置信区间[CI],1.2 - 3.4)和使用类固醇(RR = 1.8;95% CI,1.1 - 3.2)。最常鉴定出的病原体为未进一步分类的革兰氏阴性杆菌(25.9%)、金黄色葡萄球菌(21.0%)和铜绿假单胞菌(14.8%)。由于获取痰液样本容易且常见耐药菌普遍存在,我们认为HAP中的痰液培养是一种潜在有用的非侵入性诊断技术。