Suppr超能文献

在重症监护患者中,评估谵妄的方法的诊断准确性。

Diagnostic accuracy of delirium assessment methods in critical care patients.

机构信息

North Eastern Indira Gandhi Institute of Health and Medical Sciences, Shillong, Meghalaya, India.

North Eastern Indira Gandhi Institute of Health and Medical Sciences, Shillong, Meghalaya, India.

出版信息

J Crit Care. 2018 Apr;44:82-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.10.013. Epub 2017 Oct 16.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Delirium is a disorder of decreased ability to focus, sustain or shift attention, change in cognition and or perception. The main objective was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) and Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) among the nursing and medical staff in a multidisciplinary ICU.

METHODS AND MATERIAL

Three hundred ten verbally communicating and non-communicating patients (mean age in years 47.9, standard deviation [SD] 14.5, mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score 13.8, SD 6.4) were assessed by a psychiatrist, nurse and intensivist for delirium. Inter-rater agreement was measured by Cohen's kappa coefficient. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, likelihood ratios and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated.

RESULTS

CAM-ICU showed higher sensitivity and DOR (84%, 86.1) compared to ICDSC (78%, 36.9). ICDSC had specificity and positive predictive value (94.5%, 92%) equal to that of CAM-ICU. For both the assessment methods (CAM-ICU and ICDSC), DORs for intensivists (120.5, 53.0) were relatively higher than nurses (67.0, 27.0).

CONCLUSIONS

In our mixed ICU population, CAM-ICU remained more sensitive than ICDSC. Though sensitivity and DOR were higher for medical staff, other diagnostic parameters were similar for both medical and nursing staff.

摘要

目的

谵妄是一种注意力、持续力或注意力转移能力下降、认知和/或感知改变的疾病。主要目的是评估 ICU 意识混乱评估方法(CAM-ICU)和重症监护谵妄筛查检查表(ICDSC)在多学科 ICU 护理和医务人员中的诊断准确性。

方法和材料

310 名有言语交流和无言语交流能力的患者(平均年龄 47.9 岁,标准差[SD] 14.5,平均急性生理学和慢性健康评估 II 评分 13.8,SD 6.4)由精神科医生、护士和重症监护医师评估谵妄。采用 Cohen's kappa 系数衡量组内一致性。计算敏感性、特异性、预测值、似然比和诊断优势比(DOR)。

结果

CAM-ICU 的敏感性和 DOR(84%,86.1)均高于 ICDSC(78%,36.9)。ICDSC 的特异性和阳性预测值(94.5%,92%)与 CAM-ICU 相同。对于两种评估方法(CAM-ICU 和 ICDSC),重症监护医师的 DOR(120.5,53.0)相对高于护士(67.0,27.0)。

结论

在我们的混合 ICU 人群中,CAM-ICU 的敏感性仍高于 ICDSC。尽管医务人员的敏感性和 DOR 较高,但两种医疗和护理人员的其他诊断参数相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验