Al-Ansari Asim
College of Dentistry, University of Dammam, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Evid Based Dent. 2017 Oct 27;18(3):77-78. doi: 10.1038/sj.ebd.6401255.
Data sourcesMedline and Embase.Study selectionClinical reports, randomised controlled trials, controlled clinical trials and reviews about the simplified fabrication of complete dentures published in English were considered.Data extraction and synthesisA narrative summary is presented.ResultsEleven studies were included, seven of which were randomised controlled trials. Comparisons of time and cost, patient satisfaction, clinical effects, masticatory performance, masticatory ability and professional evaluation were undertaken. Patients' ratings for general satisfaction, OHIP-edentulous scale, denture quality or masticatory ability were no different between simplified and traditional approaches. The traditional approach was more expensive and time consuming.ConclusionsCurrent scientific evidence suggests that a simplified fabrication method can replace or partly replace the conventional method to produce dentures.
数据来源
医学文献数据库（Medline）和荷兰医学文摘数据库（Embase）。
研究选择
纳入以英文发表的关于全口义齿简化制作的临床报告、随机对照试验、对照临床试验及综述。
数据提取与综合
进行叙述性总结。
结果
纳入11项研究，其中7项为随机对照试验。对时间和成本、患者满意度、临床效果、咀嚼性能、咀嚼能力及专业评价进行了比较。简化制作方法与传统方法在患者总体满意度、无牙颌口腔健康影响程度量表评分、义齿质量或咀嚼能力方面的评分无差异。传统方法成本更高且耗时更长。
结论
当前科学证据表明，简化制作方法可替代或部分替代传统方法来制作义齿。
