Northern Centre for Cancer Care, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals, United Kingdom.
Phys Med Biol. 2017 Nov 21;62(24):N548-N560. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa9676.
There is increasing interest in MR-only radiotherapy planning since it provides superb soft-tissue contrast without the registration uncertainties inherent in a CT-MR registration. However, MR images cannot readily provide the electron density information necessary for radiotherapy dose calculation. An algorithm which generates synthetic CTs for dose calculations from MR images of the prostate using an atlas of 3 T MR images has been previously reported by two of the authors. This paper aimed to evaluate this algorithm using MR data acquired at a different field strength and a different centre to the algorithm atlas. Twenty-one prostate patients received planning 1.5 T MR and CT scans with routine immobilisation devices on a flat-top couch set-up using external lasers. The MR receive coils were supported by a coil bridge. Synthetic CTs were generated from the planning MR images with ([Formula: see text]) and without (sCT) a one voxel body contour expansion included in the algorithm. This was to test whether this expansion was required for 1.5 T images. Both synthetic CTs were rigidly registered to the planning CT (pCT). A 6 MV volumetric modulated arc therapy plan was created on the pCT and recalculated on the sCT and [Formula: see text]. The synthetic CTs' dose distributions were compared to the dose distribution calculated on the pCT. The percentage dose difference at isocentre without the body contour expansion (sCT-pCT) was [Formula: see text] and with ([Formula: see text]-pCT) was [Formula: see text] (mean ± one standard deviation). The [Formula: see text] result was within one standard deviation of zero and agreed with the result reported previously using 3 T MR data. The sCT dose difference only agreed within two standard deviations. The mean ± one standard deviation gamma pass rate was [Formula: see text] for the sCT and [Formula: see text] for the [Formula: see text] (with [Formula: see text] global dose difference and [Formula: see text] distance to agreement gamma criteria). The one voxel body contour expansion improves the synthetic CT accuracy for MR images acquired at 1.5 T but requires the MR voxel size to be similar to the atlas MR voxel size. This study suggests that the atlas-based algorithm can be generalised to MR data acquired using a different field strength at a different centre.
人们对仅使用磁共振(MR)进行放射治疗计划越来越感兴趣,因为它提供了出色的软组织对比度,而没有 CT-MR 配准中固有的配准不确定性。然而,MR 图像不能轻易提供放射治疗剂量计算所需的电子密度信息。两位作者之前报道了一种使用 3TMR 图像图谱为前列腺的 MR 图像生成用于剂量计算的合成 CT 的算法。本文旨在使用与算法图谱的场强和中心不同的 MR 数据来评估该算法。21 例前列腺患者在平头治疗床上使用常规固定装置接受计划 1.5TMR 和 CT 扫描,并使用外部激光。MR 接收线圈由线圈桥支撑。从计划的 MR 图像中生成了包含([Formula: see text])和不包含(sCT)算法中一个体素轮廓扩展的合成 CT。这是为了测试该扩展是否需要用于 1.5T 图像。两个合成 CT 都与计划 CT(pCT)刚性配准。在 pCT 上创建了 6MV 容积调制弧形治疗计划,并在 sCT 和 [Formula: see text]上重新计算。比较了合成 CT 的剂量分布与 pCT 计算的剂量分布。没有体轮廓扩展的等中心点处的剂量差异百分比(sCT-pCT)为 [Formula: see text],有([Formula: see text]-pCT)为 [Formula: see text](平均值 ± 一个标准差)。[Formula: see text]结果在零的一个标准差范围内,与使用 3TMR 数据报告的结果一致。sCT 剂量差异仅在两个标准差内一致。sCT 的平均 ± 一个标准差伽玛通过率为 [Formula: see text],[Formula: see text]为 [Formula: see text](具有 [Formula: see text]全局剂量差异和 [Formula: see text]距离协议伽玛标准)。一个体素轮廓扩展提高了在 1.5T 下采集的 MR 图像的合成 CT 准确性,但需要 MR 体素大小与图谱 MR 体素大小相似。这项研究表明,基于图谱的算法可以推广到在不同中心使用不同场强采集的 MR 数据。