Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes (cE3c), Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal.
Divisão de Estudos e Gestão Ambiental e de Energia, Departamento de Energia, Clima, Ambiente e Mobilidade, Direção Municipal de Ambiente, Mobilidade, Energia e Valorização Urbana, Câmara Municipal de Almada, Casa Municipal do Ambiente, Rua Bernardo Francisco da Costa, 42, 2800-029 Almada, Portugal.
Environ Res. 2018 Jan;160:469-478. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.10.023. Epub 2017 Nov 5.
Urban areas' population has grown during the last century and it is expected that over 60% of the world population will live in cities by 2050. Urban parks provide several ecosystem services that are valuable to the well-being of city-dwellers and they are also considered a nature-based solution to tackle multiple environmental problems in cities. However, the type and amount of ecosystem services provided will vary with each park vegetation type, even within same the park. Our main goal was to quantify the trade-offs in ecosystem services associated to different vegetation types, using a spatially detailed approach. Rather than relying solely on general vegetation typologies, we took a more ecologically oriented approach, by explicitly considering different units of vegetation structure and composition. This was demonstrated in a large park (44ha) located in the city of Almada (Lisbon metropolitan area, Portugal), where six vegetation units were mapped in detail and six ecosystem services were evaluated: carbon sequestration, seed dispersal, erosion prevention, water purification, air purification and habitat quality. The results showed that, when looking at the park in detail, some ecosystem services varied greatly with vegetation type. Carbon sequestration was positively influenced by tree density, independently of species composition. Seed dispersal potential was higher in lawns, and mixed forest provided the highest amount of habitat quality. Air purification service was slightly higher in mixed forest, but was high in all vegetation types, probably due to low background pollution, and both water purification and erosion prevention were high in all vegetation types. Knowing the type, location, and amount of ecosystem services provided by each vegetation type can help to improve management options based on ecosystem services trade-offs and looking for win-win situations. The trade-offs are, for example, very clear for carbon: tree planting will boost carbon sequestration regardless of species, but may not be enough to increase habitat quality. Moreover, it may also negatively influence seed dispersal service. Informed practitioners can use this ecological knowledge to promote the role of urban parks as a nature-based solution to provide multiple ecosystem services, and ultimately improve the design and management of the green infrastructure. This will also improve the science of Ecosystem Services, acknowledging that the type of vegetation matters for the provision of ecosystem services and trade-offs analysis.
上个世纪以来,城市人口不断增长,预计到 2050 年,全球将有超过 60%的人口居住在城市中。城市公园为城市居民的福祉提供了多种生态系统服务,它们也被认为是解决城市多种环境问题的基于自然的解决方案。然而,即使在同一个公园内,不同公园植被类型所提供的生态系统服务的类型和数量也会有所不同。我们的主要目标是使用空间详细的方法来量化与不同植被类型相关的生态系统服务权衡。我们没有仅仅依靠一般的植被类型学,而是采取了更具生态导向的方法,明确考虑了不同的植被结构和组成单位。这在一个位于阿尔马达市(里斯本大都市区,葡萄牙)的大型公园(44 公顷)中得到了证明,在该公园中详细绘制了六个植被单元,并评估了六个生态系统服务:碳固存、种子传播、侵蚀防治、水净化、空气净化和生境质量。结果表明,当详细观察公园时,一些生态系统服务随植被类型而有很大差异。碳固存受到树木密度的积极影响,而与物种组成无关。草坪的种子传播潜力更高,而混交林提供了最高的生境质量。空气净化服务在混交林中略高,但在所有植被类型中都很高,可能是由于背景污染低,而所有植被类型的水净化和侵蚀防治都很高。了解每种植被类型提供的生态系统服务的类型、位置和数量,可以帮助根据生态系统服务权衡来改进管理选项,并寻找双赢局面。权衡对于碳来说非常明显:无论物种如何,植树造林都会促进碳固存,但可能不足以提高生境质量。此外,它还可能对种子传播服务产生负面影响。有识之士可以利用这种生态知识,促进城市公园作为提供多种生态系统服务的基于自然的解决方案的作用,最终改善绿色基础设施的设计和管理。这也将提高生态系统服务科学的水平,承认植被类型对于提供生态系统服务和权衡分析很重要。