Suppr超能文献

验证(仅肌钙蛋白)曼彻斯特 ACS 决策辅助工具与当代心肌肌钙蛋白 I 检测的一致性。

Validation of the (Troponin-only) Manchester ACS decision aid with a contemporary cardiac troponin I assay.

机构信息

Maastricht University, Faculty of Health, Medicine & Life Sciences Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Stockport NHS Foundation Trust, Poplar Grove, Stockport, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Apr;36(4):602-607. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.09.032. Epub 2017 Sep 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes (MACS) decision aid can 'rules in' and 'rule out' acute coronary syndromes (ACS) by combining a patient's symptoms with the results of a single blood test taken at the time of arrival in the Emergency Department (ED). The original model (MACS) included two biomarkers: high sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) and heart-type fatty acid binding protein (h-FABP). A refined model without h-FABP was found to have comparable sensitivity but greater specificity. We sought to validate MACS and T-MACS using the contemporary Siemens Advia Centaur cardiac troponin I assay to increase usability in practice.

METHODS

This is a secondary analysis from prospective diagnostic cohort study at Stepping Hill Hospital, United Kingdom. Patients presenting with chest pain of suspected cardiac nature warranting rule out for ACS were included. All patients underwent hs-cTnT testing at least 12h after peak symptoms. The primary outcome was a diagnosis of ACS, defined as either prevalent acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or incident major adverse cardiac events (death, AMI or coronary revascularization) within 30days.

RESULTS

Of 405 included patients, 76 (18.8%) had ACS. MACS and T-MACS had similar C-statistics (0.94 for each, p=0.36) and sensitivity (difference 1.3%, 95% CI -1.3 to 3.9%, p=1.00) but T-MACS had significantly greater specificity (difference 16.7%, 95% CI 14.6-18.9%, p<0.0001). T-MACS and MACS would have allowed 36.3% and 22.5% patients to be immediately discharged respectively. Of patients classified as 'very low risk', none had ACS when MACS was used compared to one (0.7%) with T-MACS.

CONCLUSION

Both MACS and T-MACS effectively ruled out ACS even with a contemporary troponin I assay and could be used to reduce unnecessary hospital admissions.

摘要

目的

曼彻斯特急性冠状动脉综合征(MACS)决策辅助工具可以通过将患者的症状与急诊科就诊时单次采血的结果相结合,“规则内”和“规则外”急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)。原始模型(MACS)包括两种生物标志物:高敏心肌肌钙蛋白 T(hs-cTnT)和心脏型脂肪酸结合蛋白(h-FABP)。发现没有 h-FABP 的改良模型具有相似的敏感性但特异性更高。我们试图使用当代西门子 Advia Centaur 肌钙蛋白 I 测定法验证 MACS 和 T-MACS,以提高其在实践中的可用性。

方法

这是英国 Stepping Hill 医院前瞻性诊断队列研究的二次分析。纳入胸痛疑似心脏原因需要排除 ACS 的患者。所有患者均在症状高峰后至少 12 小时进行 hs-cTnT 检测。主要结局是在 30 天内诊断为 ACS,定义为急性心肌梗死(AMI)或重大不良心脏事件(死亡、AMI 或冠状动脉血运重建)的患病率。

结果

在纳入的 405 例患者中,76 例(18.8%)患有 ACS。MACS 和 T-MACS 的 C 统计量(均为 0.94,p=0.36)和敏感性(差异 1.3%,95%CI-1.3 至 3.9%,p=1.00)相似,但 T-MACS 的特异性明显更高(差异 16.7%,95%CI 14.6-18.9%,p<0.0001)。T-MACS 和 MACS 可分别使 36.3%和 22.5%的患者立即出院。当使用 MACS 时,分类为“极低风险”的患者均无 ACS,而使用 T-MACS 时则有 1 例(0.7%)。

结论

即使使用当代肌钙蛋白 I 测定法,MACS 和 T-MACS 也能有效地排除 ACS,可用于减少不必要的住院。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验