• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

增强疑似心前区疼痛患者的分诊:仅病史和心电图的曼彻斯特急性冠状动脉综合征决策辅助工具。

Enhanced triage for patients with suspected cardiac chest pain: the History and Electrocardiogram-only Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes decision aid.

机构信息

Cardioavascular Science Research Group, Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, The University of Manchester.

Emergency Medical Services Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Eur J Emerg Med. 2019 Oct;26(5):356-361. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000575.

DOI:10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000575
PMID:30289775
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6728057/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Several decision aids can 'rule in' and 'rule out' acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in the Emergency Department (ED) but all require measurement of blood biomarkers. A decision aid that does not require biomarker measurement could enhance risk stratification at triage and could be used in the prehospital environment. We aimed to derive and validate the History and ECG-only Manchester ACS (HE-MACS) decision aid using only the history, physical examination and ECG.

METHODS

We undertook secondary analyses in three prospective diagnostic accuracy studies that included patients presenting to the ED with suspected cardiac chest pain. Clinicians recorded clinical features at the time of arrival using a bespoke form. Patients underwent serial troponin sampling and 30-day follow-up for the primary outcome of ACS. The model was derived by logistic regression in one cohort and validated in two similar prospective studies.

RESULTS

The HE-MACS model was derived in 796 patients and validated in cohorts of 474 and 659 patients. HE-MACS incorporated age, sex, systolic blood pressure plus five historical variables to stratify patients into four risk groups. On validation, 5.5 and 12.1% (pooled total 9.4%) patients were identified as 'very low risk' (potential immediate rule out) with a pooled sensitivity of 99.5% (95% confidence interval: 97.1-100.0%).

CONCLUSION

Using only the patient's history and ECG, HE-MACS could 'rule out' ACS in 9.4% of patients while effectively risk stratifying remaining patients. This is a very promising tool for triage in both the prehospital environment and ED. Its impact should be prospectively evaluated in those settings.

摘要

目的

有几种决策辅助工具可以在急诊室(ED)中“确定”和“排除”急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS),但都需要测量血液生物标志物。一种不需要测量生物标志物的决策辅助工具可以在分诊时增强风险分层,并且可以在院前环境中使用。我们旨在仅使用病史、体格检查和心电图来推导和验证仅基于病史和心电图的曼彻斯特 ACS(HE-MACS)决策辅助工具。

方法

我们对包括疑似心前区胸痛就诊于 ED 的患者的三项前瞻性诊断准确性研究进行了二次分析。临床医生使用专门的表格在到达时记录临床特征。患者接受了连续的肌钙蛋白采样和 30 天随访,以评估 ACS 的主要结局。该模型通过一个队列中的逻辑回归推导,并在两个类似的前瞻性研究中进行验证。

结果

HE-MACS 模型在 796 例患者中推导,并在 474 例和 659 例患者的队列中验证。HE-MACS 将年龄、性别、收缩压加五个病史变量纳入模型,以将患者分为四个风险组。在验证中,5.5%和 12.1%(总合并率为 9.4%)的患者被确定为“极低风险”(潜在的立即排除),合并敏感性为 99.5%(95%置信区间:97.1-100.0%)。

结论

仅使用患者的病史和心电图,HE-MACS 可以在 9.4%的患者中“排除”ACS,同时有效地对其余患者进行风险分层。这是一种非常有前途的分诊工具,可用于院前环境和 ED。应在这些环境中前瞻性评估其效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f07/6728057/ab4a6aa5b3a1/ejem-26-356-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f07/6728057/ab4a6aa5b3a1/ejem-26-356-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f07/6728057/ab4a6aa5b3a1/ejem-26-356-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Enhanced triage for patients with suspected cardiac chest pain: the History and Electrocardiogram-only Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes decision aid.增强疑似心前区疼痛患者的分诊:仅病史和心电图的曼彻斯特急性冠状动脉综合征决策辅助工具。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2019 Oct;26(5):356-361. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000575.
2
Validation of the (Troponin-only) Manchester ACS decision aid with a contemporary cardiac troponin I assay.验证(仅肌钙蛋白)曼彻斯特 ACS 决策辅助工具与当代心肌肌钙蛋白 I 检测的一致性。
Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Apr;36(4):602-607. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.09.032. Epub 2017 Sep 23.
3
Troponin-only Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes (T-MACS) decision aid: single biomarker re-derivation and external validation in three cohorts.仅肌钙蛋白的曼彻斯特急性冠脉综合征(T-MACS)决策辅助工具:在三个队列中的单一生物标志物重新推导及外部验证
Emerg Med J. 2017 Jun;34(6):349-356. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2016-205983. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
4
The Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes (MACS) decision rule: validation with a new automated assay for heart-type fatty acid binding protein.曼彻斯特急性冠脉综合征(MACS)决策规则:采用一种新的心脏型脂肪酸结合蛋白自动检测方法进行验证
Emerg Med J. 2015 Oct;32(10):769-74. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2014-204235. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
5
Comparison of four decision aids for the early diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes in the emergency department.比较四种决策辅助工具在急诊科急性冠状动脉综合征早期诊断中的应用。
Emerg Med J. 2020 Jan;37(1):8-13. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2019-208898. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
6
Assessing sensitivity and specificity of the Manchester Triage System in the evaluation of acute coronary syndrome in adult patients in emergency care: a systematic review protocol.评估曼彻斯特分诊系统在急诊护理中评估成年急性冠状动脉综合征患者时的敏感性和特异性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):64-73. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2213.
7
Validating the Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes (MACS) and Troponin-only Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes (T-MACS) rules for the prediction of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain.验证曼彻斯特急性冠状动脉综合征(MACS)和仅肌钙蛋白的曼彻斯特急性冠状动脉综合征(T-MACS)规则对因胸痛就诊于急诊科的患者急性心肌梗死的预测价值。
Emerg Med J. 2017 Aug;34(8):517-523. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2016-206366. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
8
Diagnostic accuracy of the Troponin-only Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes (T-MACS) decision aid with a point-of-care cardiac troponin assay.仅用肌钙蛋白的曼彻斯特急性冠状动脉综合征(T-MACS)决策辅助工具与即时检测心肌肌钙蛋白检测的诊断准确性。
Emerg Med J. 2020 Apr;37(4):223-228. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2019-208882. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
9
Add-on tests for improving risk-stratification in emergency department patients with chest pain who are at low to moderate risk of 30-day major adverse cardiac events.用于改善急诊科胸痛患者风险分层的附加检测,这些患者30天内发生重大不良心脏事件的风险为低到中度。
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Oct 1;220:299-306. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.05.057. Epub 2016 May 14.
10
Development and validation of a prediction rule for early discharge of low-risk emergency department patients with potential ischemic chest pain.低风险潜在缺血性胸痛急诊科患者早期出院预测规则的制定与验证
CJEM. 2014 Mar;16(2):106-19. doi: 10.2310/8000.2013.130938.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative evaluation of HEART, T-MACS, and HE-MACS scores for risk stratification and management of patients with chest pain in the emergency department.急诊科中用于胸痛患者风险分层及管理的HEART、T-MACS和HE-MACS评分的比较评估
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Feb 7;104(6):e41432. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041432.
2
External validation of the SCARE score in identifying acute coronary syndromes during medical regulation of chest pain.SCARE评分在胸痛医学管理期间识别急性冠脉综合征中的外部验证
BMC Emerg Med. 2025 Jan 31;25(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12873-025-01178-z.
3
Chest Pain Risk Stratification in the Emergency Department: Current Perspectives.

本文引用的文献

1
Rapid Rule-out of Acute Myocardial Infarction With a Single High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T Measurement Below the Limit of Detection: A Collaborative Meta-analysis.单一高敏肌钙蛋白 T 检测低于检测限快速排除急性心肌梗死:一项协作荟萃分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2017 May 16;166(10):715-724. doi: 10.7326/M16-2562. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
2
Troponin-only Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes (T-MACS) decision aid: single biomarker re-derivation and external validation in three cohorts.仅肌钙蛋白的曼彻斯特急性冠脉综合征(T-MACS)决策辅助工具:在三个队列中的单一生物标志物重新推导及外部验证
Emerg Med J. 2017 Jun;34(6):349-356. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2016-205983. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
3
急诊科胸痛风险分层:当前观点
Open Access Emerg Med. 2024 Feb 4;16:29-43. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S419657. eCollection 2024.
4
The Ability of Emergency Medical Service Staff to Predict Emergency Department Disposition: A Prospective Study.紧急医疗服务人员预测急诊科处置结果的能力:一项前瞻性研究。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023 Jul 26;16:2101-2107. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S423654. eCollection 2023.
5
Development of Prediction Models for Acute Myocardial Infarction at Prehospital Stage with Machine Learning Based on a Nationwide Database.基于全国性数据库,利用机器学习开发院前急性心肌梗死预测模型
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2022 Dec 2;9(12):430. doi: 10.3390/jcdd9120430.
6
Accuracy of emergency medical services (EMS) telephone triage in identifying acute coronary syndrome (ACS) for patients with chest pain: a systematic literature review.紧急医疗服务(EMS)电话分诊识别胸痛患者急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)的准确性:系统文献回顾。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 25;11(8):e045815. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045815.
7
Prehospital stratification in acute chest pain patient into high risk and low risk by emergency medical service: a prospective cohort study.通过紧急医疗服务对急性胸痛患者进行院前分层为高风险和低风险:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 15;11(4):e044938. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044938.
8
Prehospital triage of patients with acute cardiac complaints: study protocol of HART-c, a multicentre prospective study.急性心脏疾病患者的院前分诊:多中心前瞻性研究HART-c的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 12;11(2):e041553. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041553.
9
Prehospital use of a modified HEART Pathway and point-of-care troponin to predict cardiovascular events.院前使用改良的 HEART 路径和即时检测肌钙蛋白预测心血管事件。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 7;15(10):e0239460. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239460. eCollection 2020.
10
Value of Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes Decision Rule in the Detection of Acute Coronary Syndrome; a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.曼彻斯特急性冠状动脉综合征决策规则在急性冠状动脉综合征检测中的价值;一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Emerg (Tehran). 2018;6(1):e61. Epub 2018 Dec 15.
Evaluation of High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I Levels in Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome.
评价疑似急性冠状动脉综合征患者的高敏心肌肌钙蛋白 I 水平。
JAMA Cardiol. 2016 Jul 1;1(4):405-12. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.1309.
4
How do patients with chest pain access Emergency Department care?胸痛患者如何获得急诊护理?
Eur J Emerg Med. 2017 Dec;24(6):423-427. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000393.
5
Effectiveness of EDACS Versus ADAPT Accelerated Diagnostic Pathways for Chest Pain: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Embedded Within Practice.急诊胸痛加速诊断流程(EDACS)与急性胸痛快速诊疗流程(ADAPT)的有效性比较:一项基于实际临床的实用随机对照试验
Ann Emerg Med. 2016 Jul;68(1):93-102.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.01.001.
6
Multicenter Evaluation of a 0-Hour/1-Hour Algorithm in the Diagnosis of Myocardial Infarction With High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T.高敏心肌肌钙蛋白T诊断心肌梗死的0小时/1小时算法的多中心评估
Ann Emerg Med. 2016 Jul;68(1):76-87.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.11.013. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
7
Clinical assessment of patients with chest pain; a systematic review of predictive tools.胸痛患者的临床评估;预测工具的系统评价
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016 Jan 20;16:18. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0196-4.
8
Chest pain: if it hurts a lot, is heart attack more likely?胸痛:如果疼痛剧烈,是否更有可能是心脏病发作?
Eur J Emerg Med. 2016 Apr;23(2):89-94. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000218.
9
Fast assessment and management of chest pain without ST-elevation in the pre-hospital gateway: rationale and design.院前阶段对无ST段抬高型胸痛的快速评估与管理:原理与设计
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2015 Apr;4(2):129-36. doi: 10.1177/2048872614549738. Epub 2014 Sep 8.
10
The Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes (MACS) decision rule for suspected cardiac chest pain: derivation and external validation.曼彻斯特急性冠状动脉综合征 (MACS) 决策规则用于疑似心前区疼痛:推导和外部验证。
Heart. 2014 Sep 15;100(18):1462-8. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-305564. Epub 2014 Apr 29.