Suppr超能文献

利托那韦增强型达芦那韦联合两种核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂与其他方案用于HIV感染患者初始抗逆转录病毒治疗的系统评价

Ritonavir-Boosted Darunavir Plus Two Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors versus Other Regimens for Initial Antiretroviral Therapy for People with HIV Infection: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Balayan Tatevik, Horvath Hacsi, Rutherford George W

机构信息

Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

School of Public Health, American University of Armenia, Yerevan, Armenia.

出版信息

AIDS Res Treat. 2017;2017:2345617. doi: 10.1155/2017/2345617. Epub 2017 Sep 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Darunavir is a second-generation protease-inhibitor used with ritonavir (DRV/r) and two nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors as an option in first-line antiretroviral treatment (ART).

METHODS

We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of DRV/r versus other regimens in patients initiating ART. We searched five bibliographic databases and other key resources. We had no language limitations. We assessed bias risk with the Cochrane tool and used GRADE to assess evidence quality. We report findings in terms of risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

FINDINGS

Three RCTs met inclusion criteria. In plasma viral load suppression, DRV/r outperformed ritonavir-boosted lopinavir at 48 weeks (RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.03-1.25), 96 weeks (RR 1.11, 95% CI 1.02-1.21), and 192 weeks (RR 1.20, 95% CI 1.07-1.35). DRV/r was similar to dolutegravir at 48 weeks (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.87-1.06) but less effective at 96 weeks (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.75-0.93). At 96 weeks, DRV/r underperformed raltegravir (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.88-0.99) but was similar to ritonavir-boosted atazanavir (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.96-1.09). Overall bias risk was moderate. Evidence quality was also moderate.

INTERPRETATION

Initial ART regimens using DRV/r should be considered in future World Health Organization guidelines.

摘要

背景

地瑞那韦是一种第二代蛋白酶抑制剂,与利托那韦联合使用(DRV/r),并与两种核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂一起作为一线抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)的一种选择。

方法

我们系统回顾了在开始接受ART治疗的患者中比较DRV/r与其他治疗方案的随机对照试验(RCT)。我们检索了五个文献数据库和其他关键资源。我们没有语言限制。我们使用Cochrane工具评估偏倚风险,并使用GRADE评估证据质量。我们以风险比(RR)及95%置信区间(CI)报告研究结果。

结果

三项RCT符合纳入标准。在血浆病毒载量抑制方面,DRV/r在48周(RR 1.13,95%CI 1.03 - 1.25)、96周(RR 1.11,95%CI 1.02 - 1.21)和192周(RR 1.20,95%CI 1.07 - 1.35)时优于利托那韦增强的洛匹那韦。DRV/r在48周时与多替拉韦相似(RR 0.96,95%CI 0.87 - 1.06),但在96周时效果较差(RR 0.84,95%CI 0.75 - 0.93)。在96周时,DRV/r的表现不如拉替拉韦(RR 0.94,95%CI 0.88 - 0.99),但与利托那韦增强的阿扎那韦相似(RR 1.02,95%CI 0.96 - 1.09)。总体偏倚风险为中等。证据质量也为中等。

解读

未来世界卫生组织的指南中应考虑使用DRV/r的初始ART方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8eb5/5634582/7fe47e8b2a80/ART2017-2345617.001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验