Suppr超能文献

甲氟喹+磺胺多辛+乙胺嘧啶(Fansimef)联合用药长期预防疟疾的耐受性:尼日利亚一项与氯喹对比的双盲现场试验结果

Tolerability of long-term malaria prophylaxis with the combination mefloquine + sulfadoxine + pyrimethamine (Fansimef): results of a double blind field trial versus chloroquine in Nigeria.

作者信息

Kollaritsch H, Stemberger H, Mailer H, Kremsner P, Kollaritsch R, Leimer R, Wiedermann G

机构信息

Institute of Specific Prophylaxis and Tropical Medicine, University of Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1988;82(4):524-9. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(88)90492-0.

Abstract

A randomized double blind study in long term malaria chemoprophylaxis was performed to compare the tolerability of Fansimef (1 tablet containing 250 mg mefloquine + 500 mg sulfadoxine + 25 mg pyrimethamine per week) with chloroquine (300 mg per week). 211 Austrian industrial workers and their families in Warri, Nigeria, participated in this study; 101 received Fansimef and 110 chloroquine for 3-18 months (mean 41 weeks). Prophylaxis was discontinued because of adverse effects in 7 volunteers in the Fansimef group (mainly insomnia, palpitations, dizziness, nausea and headache) and in 2 volunteers of the chloroquine group (headache and loss of hair in one volunteer, nausea, dizziness and vomiting in the other). Most of the adverse effects could be due to the mefloquine component. A few minor complaints of burning eyes, nausea and gastric pain were reported in both groups. Laboratory checks performed at 3-monthly intervals showed a slight, transient and clinically irrelevant (but statistically significant) increase of serum glutamic-oxalacetic transaminase and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase at month 3 in the Fansimef group. An attack of acute Plasmodium falciparum malaria occurred in one volunteer 6 weeks after discontinuation of prophylaxis with Fansimef. Antibodies against blood stage parasites could be demonstrated by the indirect immunofluorescence test at different stages of the study, indicating that these two antimalarials are not causal prophylactic agents.

摘要

进行了一项关于长期疟疾化学预防的随机双盲研究,以比较甲氟喹(每周1片,含250毫克甲氟喹+500毫克磺胺多辛+25毫克乙胺嘧啶)与氯喹(每周300毫克)的耐受性。211名在尼日利亚瓦里的奥地利产业工人及其家属参与了这项研究;101人接受甲氟喹,110人接受氯喹,为期3至18个月(平均41周)。由于不良反应,甲氟喹组有7名志愿者(主要是失眠、心悸、头晕、恶心和头痛)以及氯喹组有2名志愿者(一名志愿者出现头痛和脱发,另一名出现恶心、头晕和呕吐)停止了预防用药。大多数不良反应可能归因于甲氟喹成分。两组均报告了一些轻微的眼部烧灼感、恶心和胃痛等主诉。每隔3个月进行的实验室检查显示,甲氟喹组在第3个月时血清谷草转氨酶和γ-谷氨酰转肽酶有轻微、短暂且临床上无意义(但在统计学上有显著意义)的升高。一名志愿者在停用甲氟喹预防用药6周后发生了1次恶性疟原虫疟疾发作。在研究的不同阶段,通过间接免疫荧光试验可检测到针对血液阶段寄生虫的抗体,这表明这两种抗疟药并非病因性预防药物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验