University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK.
Assessment. 2019 Dec;26(8):1444-1461. doi: 10.1177/1073191117738045. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
Research suggests that trait resilience may be best understood within an ecological resilient systems theory, comprising engineering, ecological, and adaptive capacity resilience. However, there is no evidence as to how this theory translates to specific life domains. Data from two samples (the United States, = 1,278; the United Kingdom, = 211) facilitated five studies that introduce the Domain-Specific Resilient Systems Scales for assessing ecological resilient systems theory within work, health, marriage, friendships, and education. The Domain-Specific Resilient Systems Scales are found to predict unique variance in job satisfaction, lower job burnout, quality-of-life following illness, marriage commitment, and educational engagement, while controlling for factors including sex, age, personality, cognitive ability, and trait resilience. The findings also suggest a distinction between the three resilience dimensions in terms of the types of systems to which they contribute. Engineering resilience may contribute most to life domains where an established system needs to be maintained, for example, one's health. Ecological resilience may contribute most to life domains where the system needs sustainability in terms of present and future goal orientation, for example, one's work. Adaptive Capacity may contribute most to life domains where the system needs to be retained, preventing it from reaching a crisis state, for example, work burnout.
研究表明,特质韧性可以在生态弹性系统理论中得到最好的理解,该理论包括工程、生态和适应能力韧性。然而,目前还没有证据表明这一理论如何转化为特定的生活领域。来自两个样本(美国,n=1278;英国,n=211)的数据支持了五项研究,这些研究引入了特定领域的弹性系统量表,用于评估工作、健康、婚姻、友谊和教育领域中的生态弹性系统理论。这些特定领域的弹性系统量表被发现可以预测工作满意度、降低工作倦怠、疾病后的生活质量、婚姻承诺和教育参与度的独特差异,同时控制了性别、年龄、个性、认知能力和特质韧性等因素。研究结果还表明,在贡献类型方面,这三个韧性维度之间存在区别。工程韧性可能对需要维持现有系统的生活领域(例如健康)贡献最大。生态韧性可能对需要从当前和未来目标定位角度保持系统可持续性的生活领域(例如工作)贡献最大。适应能力可能对需要保留系统、防止其陷入危机状态的生活领域(例如工作倦怠)贡献最大。