Department of Management Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Texas Transplant Institute, Methodist Specialty and Transplant Hospital, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Am J Transplant. 2018 May;18(5):1177-1186. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14566. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
Numerous kidney exchange (kidney paired donation [KPD]) registries in the United States have gradually shifted to high-frequency match-runs, raising the question of whether this harms the number of transplants. We conducted simulations using clinical data from 2 KPD registries-the Alliance for Paired Donation, which runs multihospital exchanges, and Methodist San Antonio, which runs single-center exchanges-to study how the frequency of match-runs impacts the number of transplants and the average waiting times. We simulate the options facing each of the 2 registries by repeated resampling from their historical pools of patient-donor pairs and nondirected donors, with arrival and departure rates corresponding to the historical data. We find that longer intervals between match-runs do not increase the total number of transplants, and that prioritizing highly sensitized patients is more effective than waiting longer between match-runs for transplanting highly sensitized patients. While we do not find that frequent match-runs result in fewer transplanted pairs, we do find that increasing arrival rates of new pairs improves both the fraction of transplanted pairs and waiting times.
美国有许多肾脏交换(配对供肾移植)注册中心逐渐转向高频匹配运行,这引发了一个问题,即这是否会影响移植数量。我们使用来自两个 KPD 注册中心(联盟配对供体,运行多医院交换;卫理公会圣安东尼奥,运行单一中心交换)的临床数据进行了模拟,以研究匹配运行的频率如何影响移植数量和平均等待时间。我们通过从他们的历史患者-供体对和非定向供体池中重复抽样来模拟每个注册中心面临的选择,并根据历史数据设置到达和离开率。我们发现,匹配运行之间的间隔较长不会增加移植总数,并且优先考虑高度敏感的患者比在匹配运行之间等待更长时间更有效。虽然我们没有发现频繁的匹配运行导致移植对减少,但我们确实发现增加新对的到达率可以提高移植对的比例和等待时间。