Reply to Morice et al.: Developing Clinical Guidelines.
作者信息
Schoenberg Noah C, Wilson Kevin C
机构信息
1 Boston University School of Medicine Boston, Massachusetts.
出版信息
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Mar 15;197(6):837-838. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201710-2039LE.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Reply to Morice et al.: Developing Clinical Guidelines.对莫里塞等人的回复：制定临床指南。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Mar 15;197(6):837-838. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201710-2039LE.
2
Reply to Dahm et al., to Shah et al., and to Schünemann and Brożek.对达姆等人、沙阿等人以及许内曼和布罗泽克的回复。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Jun 1;197(11):1502-1503. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201712-2433LE.
3
Reply to Mumin : The Challenges of Using and Measuring Thiamine in Critical Care.对穆明的回复：重症监护中硫胺素的使用与测量挑战
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 Mar 1;209(5):607-608. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202310-1740LE.
4
Re: A need for laparoscopic evaluation of patients with endometrial carcinoma selected for conservative treatment by P. Morice et al.回复：P. 莫里塞等人对选择保守治疗的子宫内膜癌患者进行腹腔镜评估的必要性
Gynecol Oncol. 2005 Jul;98(1):175; author reply 176. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.03.030.
5
Reply to technical comment on: Biskup E, et al. Oncological patients in the intensive care unit: prognosis, decision-making, therapies and end-of-life care.对关于《比斯科普E等人：重症监护病房中的肿瘤患者——预后、决策、治疗及临终关怀》的技术评论的回复
Swiss Med Wkly. 2017 Nov 23;147:w14558. doi: 10.4414/smw.2017.14558. eCollection 2017.
6
Regarding "First case of a centropelvic recurrence after radical trachelectomy: literature review and implications for the preoperative selection of patients," (92:1002-5) by Morice et al.关于莫里塞等人发表的《根治性气管切除术后宫旁复发首例：文献综述及对患者术前选择的启示》（92:1002 - 5）
Gynecol Oncol. 2004 Nov;95(2):414; author reply 414-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.07.013.
7
Concerns about LUNG-SAFE: response to the letter to the Editor of Critical Care by Bellani et al.对LUNG-SAFE研究的关注：对Bellani等人致《重症医学》编辑信件的回应
Crit Care. 2016 Sep 17;20:296. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1477-0.
8
Pain assessment using the critical-care pain observation tool: comment on Li et al.使用重症监护疼痛观察工具进行疼痛评估：对李等人研究的评论
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Nov;48(5):e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.05.020. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
9
Reply from the authors. Reply: SDD and contextual effect.作者回复。回复：选择性消化道去污和情境效应。
Br J Anaesth. 2015 Sep;115(3):480. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev267.
10
Capsule Commentary on Grant et al., Which Complex Patients Should Be Referred for Intensive Care Management? A Mixed Methods Analysis.关于格兰特等人的胶囊评论：哪些复杂患者应被转诊至重症监护管理？一项混合方法分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Sep;33(9):1551. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4570-z.
引用本文的文献
1
Clinical Practice Guideline Methodology: An Evolving Science.临床实践指南方法学：一门不断发展的科学。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2023 Jan 1;207(1):1-2. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202209-1646ED.
本文引用的文献
1
Developing Clinical Guidelines: 99% Faster Is Not Enough.制定临床指南：快99%是不够的。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Sep 1;196(5):543-544. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201707-1542ED.
2
A Comparative Analysis of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Guideline Development Methodologies.肺与重症医学指南制定方法的比较分析
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Sep 1;196(5):621-627. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201705-0926OC.
3
The predictive validity of quality of evidence grades for the stability of effect estimates was low: a meta-epidemiological study.证据质量等级对效应估计稳定性的预测效度较低：一项meta 流行病学研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Feb;70:52-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.08.018. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
4
The GRADE approach is reproducible in assessing the quality of evidence of quantitative evidence syntheses.GRADE 方法可重现用于评估定量证据综合的证据质量。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Jul;66(7):736-42; quiz 742.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.02.004. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
Zotero 插件