• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统II(EuroSCORE II)和胸外科医师协会(STS)评分在经心尖经导管主动脉瓣植入术中比在经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣植入术中更准确。

EuroSCORE II and the STS score are more accurate in transapical than in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

作者信息

Kofler Markus, Reinstadler Sebastian J, Stastny Lukas, Dumfarth Julia, Reindl Martin, Wachter Kristina, Rustenbach Christian J, Müller Silvana, Feuchtner Gudrun, Friedrich Guy, Metzler Bernhard, Grimm Michael, Bonaros Nikolaos, Baumbach Hardy

机构信息

University Clinic of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

University Clinic of Internal Medicine III, Cardiology and Angiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

出版信息

Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2018 Mar 1;26(3):413-419. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivx343.

DOI:10.1093/icvts/ivx343
PMID:29088475
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II (EuroSCORE II) and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score are currently used to estimate periprocedural risk of death in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). However, data regarding the predictive ability and usefulness of these scores for TAVI are controversial, especially for different access sites.

METHODS

Between 2008 and 2016, 1192 consecutive patients undergoing TAVI [transfemoral (TF): n = 607 (51%); transapical (TA): n = 585 (49%)] at 2 centres were included. All-cause mortality was assessed at a median of 533 days (interquartile range 153-1036). The value of the EuroSCORE II and the STS score in terms of predicting 30-day and cumulative mortality according to access site was investigated.

RESULTS

The mean age was 83 (interquartile range 79-86) years. Overall, the 30-day mortality rate was 7.6% (n = 90), and the cumulative all-cause mortality rate was 35.1% (n = 418). The EuroSCORE II and the STS score were significantly increased in non-survivors compared with survivors (P < 0.001). The EuroSCORE II and the STS score emerged as independent predictors of 30-day mortality [EuroSCORE II: odds ratio (OR) 1.039, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.013-1.065; P = 0.003; STS score: OR 1.055, 95% CI 1.023-1.088; P = 0.001] and cumulative all-cause mortality [EuroSCORE II: hazard ratio (HR) 1.026, 95% CI 1.013-1.038; P < 0.001; STS score: HR 1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.06; P < 0.001]. In contrast to TF TAVI, the EuroSCORE II (OR 1.038, 95% CI 1.009-1.068; P = 0.010) and the STS score (OR: 1.063, 95% CI 1.025-1.102; P = 0.001) were independent predictors of 30-day mortality and cumulative mortality (EuroSCORE II: HR 1.023, 95% CI 1.009-1.037; P = 0.001; STS score: HR 1.055, 95% CI 1.037-1.073; P < 0.001) in patients undergoing TA TAVI.

CONCLUSIONS

The EuroSCORE II and the STS score were independent predictors of 30-day and cumulative mortality rates in patients undergoing TAVI. The EuroSCORE II and the STS score were associated with 30-day mortality and mortality during follow-up period only in TA TAVI.

摘要

目的

欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统II(EuroSCORE II)和胸外科医师协会(STS)评分目前用于估计经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)患者围手术期死亡风险。然而,关于这些评分对TAVI的预测能力和实用性的数据存在争议,尤其是对于不同的入路部位。

方法

2008年至2016年期间,纳入了在2个中心连续接受TAVI的1192例患者[经股动脉(TF):n = 607例(51%);经心尖(TA):n = 585例(49%)]。在中位时间533天(四分位间距153 - 1036天)时评估全因死亡率。研究了EuroSCORE II和STS评分根据入路部位预测30天和累积死亡率的价值。

结果

平均年龄为83岁(四分位间距79 - 86岁)。总体而言,30天死亡率为7.6%(n = 90),累积全因死亡率为35.1%(n = 418)。与存活者相比,非存活者的EuroSCORE II和STS评分显著升高(P < 0.001)。EuroSCORE II和STS评分成为30天死亡率的独立预测因素[EuroSCORE II:比值比(OR)1.039,95%置信区间(CI)1.013 - 1.065;P = 0.003;STS评分:OR 1.055,95% CI 1.023 - 1.088;P = 0.001]和累积全因死亡率[EuroSCORE II:风险比(HR)1.026,95% CI 1.013 - 1.038;P < 0.001;STS评分:HR 1.05,95% CI 1.03 - 1.06;P < 0.001]。与经股动脉TAVI不同,EuroSCORE II(OR 1.038,95% CI 1.009 - 1.068;P = 0.010)和STS评分(OR:1.063,95% CI 1.025 - 1.102;P = 0.001)是接受经心尖TAVI患者30天死亡率和累积死亡率的独立预测因素(EuroSCORE II:HR 1.023,95% CI 1.009 - 1.037;P = 0.001;STS评分:HR 1.055,95% CI 1.037 - 1.073;P < 0.001)。

结论

EuroSCORE II和STS评分是TAVI患者30天和累积死亡率的独立预测因素。EuroSCORE II和STS评分仅在经心尖TAVI中与30天死亡率和随访期间死亡率相关。

相似文献

1
EuroSCORE II and the STS score are more accurate in transapical than in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation.欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统II(EuroSCORE II)和胸外科医师协会(STS)评分在经心尖经导管主动脉瓣植入术中比在经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣植入术中更准确。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2018 Mar 1;26(3):413-419. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivx343.
2
The STS score is the strongest predictor of long-term survival following transcatheter aortic valve implantation, whereas access route (transapical versus transfemoral) has no predictive value beyond the periprocedural phase.STS评分是经导管主动脉瓣植入术后长期生存的最强预测指标,而入路途径(经心尖与经股动脉)在围手术期之外没有预测价值。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013 Aug;17(2):359-64. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivt132. Epub 2013 May 3.
3
EuroSCORE II and STS as mortality predictors in patients undergoing TAVI.欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统II(EuroSCORE II)和胸外科医师协会(STS)评分作为经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)患者死亡率的预测指标
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2016 Jan-Feb;62(1):32-7. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.62.01.32.
4
Prediction of 30-day mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a comparison of logistic EuroSCORE, STS score, and EuroSCORE II.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后30天死亡率的预测:逻辑欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统、胸外科医师协会评分和欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统II的比较
J Heart Valve Dis. 2014 Sep;23(5):567-74.
5
Transapical versus transfemoral aortic valve implantation: a multicenter collaborative study.经心尖与经股主动脉瓣置换术:一项多中心合作研究。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Jan;97(1):22-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.09.088. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
6
Performance analysis of EuroSCORE II compared to the original logistic EuroSCORE and STS scores for predicting 30-day mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后 30 天死亡率预测的 EuroSCORE II 与原始 logistic EuroSCORE 和 STS 评分的性能分析。
Am J Cardiol. 2013 Mar 15;111(6):891-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.11.056. Epub 2013 Jan 18.
7
Predicting Risk in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Comparative Analysis of EuroSCORE II and Established Risk Stratification Tools.经导管主动脉瓣植入术风险预测:欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统II(EuroSCORE II)与既定风险分层工具的比较分析
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Sep;63(6):472-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1389107. Epub 2014 Sep 5.
8
Comparison between Society of Thoracic Surgeons score and logistic EuroSCORE for predicting mortality in patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation.胸外科医师协会评分与逻辑欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统在预测接受经导管主动脉瓣植入术患者死亡率方面的比较。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2011 Nov-Dec;12(6):345-9. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2011.04.005. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
9
Surgical Risk Scores Applied to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Friends or Foes? Short-Term and Long-Term Outcomes From a Single-Center Registry.应用于经导管主动脉瓣植入术的手术风险评分:是友是敌?来自单中心注册研究的短期和长期结果
J Invasive Cardiol. 2019 Oct;31(10):E282-E288.
10
1-Year Clinical Outcomes in Women After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Results From the First WIN-TAVI Registry.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后女性 1 年的临床结局:来自首个 WIN-TAVI 注册研究的结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jan 8;11(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.09.034.

引用本文的文献

1
Complex Transfemoral Access During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Narrative Review of Management, Complexity Scores, and Alternative Access.经导管主动脉瓣置换术中的复杂经股动脉入路:管理、复杂性评分及替代入路的叙述性综述
Life (Basel). 2025 May 19;15(5):810. doi: 10.3390/life15050810.
2
Construction of Predictive Models for Cardiovascular Mortality by Machine Learning Approaches in Patients Who Underwent Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.采用机器学习方法构建经导管主动脉瓣植入术患者心血管死亡预测模型
Circ Rep. 2025 Mar 4;7(4):293-302. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-24-0182. eCollection 2025 Apr 10.
3
A virtual patient authoring tool for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
一种用于经导管主动脉瓣置换术的虚拟患者创作工具。
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2025 Feb;20(2):379-389. doi: 10.1007/s11548-024-03293-x. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
4
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Access Sites: Same Goals, Distinct Aspects, Various Merits and Demerits.经导管主动脉瓣植入术的入路部位:相同目标、不同方面、诸多优缺点
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023 Dec 22;11(1):4. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11010004.
5
A Clinical Audit on the Indications for Intervention With Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Over Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Aortic Stenosis Patients in Mohammed Bin Khalifa Bin Salman Al Khalifa Specialist Cardiac Centre.穆罕默德·本·哈利法·本·萨勒曼·阿勒哈利法心脏专科中心关于主动脉瓣狭窄患者经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术干预指征的临床审计
Cureus. 2023 May 19;15(5):e39249. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39249. eCollection 2023 May.
6
Risk stratification using growth differentiation factor 15 in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术患者使用生长分化因子 15 进行风险分层。
Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2023 Sep;167(3):263-271. doi: 10.5507/bp.2022.017. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
7
TAVR: A Review of Current Practices and Considerations in Low-Risk Patients.经导管主动脉瓣置换术:低危患者的当前实践和考虑因素综述。
J Interv Cardiol. 2020 Dec 24;2020:2582938. doi: 10.1155/2020/2582938. eCollection 2020.
8
Prognostic implications of left ventricular geometry in coronary artery bypass grafting patients.冠状动脉搭桥术患者左心室几何形态的预后意义
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2020 Dec;10(12):2274-2284. doi: 10.21037/qims-19-926.
9
Severity Index Performance in Predicting Postoperative Complications of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.严重程度指数在预测冠状动脉旁路移植术后并发症中的表现
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2020 Sep;115(3):460-461. doi: 10.36660/abc.20200515.
10
Impact of post-procedural glycemic variability on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a post hoc cohort analysis.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后血糖变异性对心血管发病率和死亡率的影响:一项事后队列分析。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019 Mar 11;18(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12933-019-0831-3.