1 Otorhinolaryngology Department, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
2 Otorhinolaryngology Department, National Institute of Rehabilitation, Mexico City, Mexico.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Feb;158(2):350-357. doi: 10.1177/0194599817739837. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
Objective To evaluate cochlear trauma after cochlear implant insertion through a middle fossa approach by means of histologic and imaging studies in temporal bones. Study Design Prospective cadaveric study. Setting University-based temporal bone laboratory. Subjects and Methods Twenty fresh-frozen temporal bones were implanted through a middle cranial fossa basal turn cochleostomy. Ten received a straight electrode and 10 a perimodiolar electrode. Samples were fixed in epoxy resin. Computed tomography (CT) scans determined direction, depth of insertion, and the cochleostomy to round window distance. The samples were polished by a microgrinding technique and microscopically visualized to evaluate intracochlear trauma. Descriptive and analytic statistics were performed to compare both groups. Results The CT scan showed intracochlear insertions in every bone, 10 directed to the middle/apical turn and 10 to the basal turn. In the straight electrode group, the average number of inserted electrodes was 12.3 vs 15.1 for the perimodiolar group ( U = 78, P = .0001). The median insertion depth was larger for the perimodiolar group (14.4 mm vs 12.5 mm, U = 66, P = .021). Only 1 nontraumatic insertion was achieved and 14 samples (70%) had important trauma (Eshraghi grades 3 and 4). No differences were identified comparing position or trauma grades for the 2 electrode models or when comparing trauma depending on the direction of insertion. Conclusion The surgical technique allows a proper intracochlear insertion, but it does not guarantee a correct scala tympani position and carries the risk of important trauma to cochlear microstructures.
目的 通过颞骨的组织学和影像学研究,评估经中颅窝入路进行人工耳蜗植入后耳蜗的创伤。
研究设计 前瞻性尸体研究。
设置 大学颞骨实验室。
受试者和方法 20 例新鲜冷冻颞骨通过中颅底耳蜗造口术植入。10 例植入直电极,10 例植入环绕电极。样本用环氧树脂固定。计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描确定插入的方向、深度以及耳蜗造口到圆窗的距离。样本通过微磨技术抛光,并进行显微镜观察,以评估耳蜗内的创伤。对两组数据进行描述性和分析性统计分析。
结果 CT 扫描显示所有骨骼中都有耳蜗内插入,10 例指向中/尖部,10 例指向基底部。在直电极组中,平均插入的电极数量为 12.3 个,而环绕电极组为 15.1 个(U = 78,P =.0001)。环绕电极组的插入深度中位数较大(14.4 毫米比 12.5 毫米,U = 66,P =.021)。仅实现了 1 例非创伤性插入,14 例(70%)样本存在严重创伤(Eshraghi 分级 3 和 4)。两种电极模型的位置或创伤分级之间,或根据插入方向比较创伤时,均未发现差异。
结论 手术技术允许适当的耳蜗内插入,但不能保证正确的鼓阶位置,并存在对耳蜗微观结构造成严重创伤的风险。