• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The relationship of one abnormal glucose tolerance test value and pregnancy complications.

作者信息

Lindsay M K, Graves W, Klein L

机构信息

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Jan;73(1):103-6.

PMID:2909030
Abstract

While an abnormal oral glucose tolerance test (GTT) is known to be associated with an increased risk of pregnancy complications, the impact of one abnormal value is not clear. In 1986 we screened 4618 pregnant women for gestational diabetes at 24-28 weeks' gestation. Eighty-seven percent had normal results; of the 13% with abnormal screening tests, 139 had one abnormal value on the subsequent 3-hour oral GTT. These women were then compared with 725 randomly selected patients with a normal screening test. The frequency of chronic hypertension, cesarean section, 5-minute Apgar score below 7, preterm delivery, shoulder dystocia, congenital malformations, and perinatal mortality did not differ significantly between the groups. The incidence of macrosomia (birth weight above 4000 g) was significantly greater in the study group (18.0%) than in the control group (6.6%) (odds ratio 2.18; 95% confidence interval 1.77-5.37), a relationship that persisted after controlling for confounding risk factors by logistic regression modeling (odds ratio 2.55; 95% confidence interval 1.44-4.52). The incidence of preeclampsia/eclampsia was significantly greater in the study group (7.9%) than in the control group (3.3%) (odds ratio 2.51; 95% confidence interval 1.14-5.52), which also persisted after controlling for confounding risk factors using logistic regression modeling (odds ratio 2.81; 95% confidence interval 1.26-6.28). Our results suggest that patients with one abnormal value on an oral GTT during pregnancy are at risk for delivering macrosomic infants and developing preeclampsia/eclampsia.

摘要

相似文献

1
The relationship of one abnormal glucose tolerance test value and pregnancy complications.
Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Jan;73(1):103-6.
2
Women with one elevated 3-hour glucose tolerance test value: are they at risk for adverse perinatal outcomes?口服葡萄糖耐量试验3小时值单次升高的女性:她们是否存在围产期不良结局的风险?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 May;194(5):e16-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.01.028.
3
Abnormal glucose screening tests in pregnancy: a risk factor for fetal macrosomia.孕期葡萄糖筛查异常:胎儿巨大儿的一个风险因素。
Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Apr;69(4):570-3.
4
Incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus among pregnant women with one abnormal value of oral glucose tolerance test.口服葡萄糖耐量试验有一项异常值的孕妇中妊娠期糖尿病的发病率。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2006 Aug;89(8):1109-14.
5
Class A1 gestational diabetes: a meaningful diagnosis?A1 级妊娠期糖尿病:一个有意义的诊断?
Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Aug;82(2):260-5.
6
Characteristics of patients with abnormal glucose challenge test and normal oral glucose tolerance test results: comparison with normal and gestational diabetic patients.葡萄糖耐量试验异常但口服葡萄糖耐量试验结果正常的患者特征:与正常及妊娠期糖尿病患者的比较
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 May;194(5):e42-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.11.031. Epub 2006 Apr 21.
7
[Maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnant women with abnormal glucose metabolism].[糖代谢异常孕妇的母婴结局]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2007 Jun;42(6):377-81.
8
The Toronto Tri-Hospital Gestational Diabetes Project. A preliminary review.多伦多三院妊娠期糖尿病项目。初步综述。
Diabetes Care. 1998 Aug;21 Suppl 2:B33-42.
9
Perinatal outcomes in gestational diabetes: a comparison of criteria for diagnosis.妊娠期糖尿病的围产期结局:诊断标准的比较
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 May;184(6):1118-21. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.114918.
10
The prevalence of gestational diabetes in a Sri Lankan antenatal clinic.斯里兰卡一家产前诊所中妊娠期糖尿病的患病率。
Ceylon Med J. 1998 Jun;43(2):88-91.

引用本文的文献

1
A 10-Year Retrospective Study: Is Maternal Diabetes a Risk Factor for Associated Anomalies in Males With Cryptorchidism?一项10年回顾性研究:母亲患糖尿病是否为隐睾症男性相关异常的危险因素?
Cureus. 2024 Sep 22;16(9):e69892. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69892. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Risk Factors of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Among Pregnant Women Attending Antenatal Care in King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯利雅得国王沙特医疗城接受产前护理的孕妇中妊娠期糖尿病的危险因素
Cureus. 2024 Aug 24;16(8):e67701. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67701. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Glucose tolerance test with a single abnormal value as a predictor of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a multicenter retrospective study.
单次异常葡萄糖耐量试验值预测 2 型糖尿病:一项多中心回顾性研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 21;14(1):6792. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-57535-8.
4
Could Metformin Manage Gestational Diabetes Mellitus instead of Insulin?二甲双胍能否替代胰岛素治疗妊娠期糖尿病?
Int J Reprod Med. 2016;2016:3480629. doi: 10.1155/2016/3480629. Epub 2016 Aug 14.
5
The Relationship between Maternal Gestational Impaired Glucose Tolerance and Risk of Large-for-Gestational-Age Infant: A Meta-Analysis of 14 Studies.母亲妊娠期糖耐量受损与大于胎龄儿风险的关系:14项研究的荟萃分析
J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol. 2016 Sep 1;8(3):264-9. doi: 10.4274/jcrpe.2583. Epub 2016 Apr 18.
6
Gestational diabetes mellitus: challenges in diagnosis and management.妊娠期糖尿病:诊断与管理中的挑战
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2015 May 12;14:42. doi: 10.1186/s40200-015-0169-7. eCollection 2015.
7
Diversified microbiota of meconium is affected by maternal diabetes status.胎粪中的微生物多样性受母体糖尿病状态的影响。
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 6;8(11):e78257. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078257. eCollection 2013.
8
Diagnosing gestational diabetes mellitus: rationed or rationally related to risk?诊断妊娠期糖尿病:是定量配给还是与风险合理相关?
Diabetes Care. 2013 Oct;36(10):2879-80. doi: 10.2337/dc13-1250.
9
Gestational diabetes mellitus: can we reach consensus?妊娠期糖尿病:我们能达成共识吗?
Curr Diab Rep. 2010 Aug;10(4):252-4. doi: 10.1007/s11892-010-0117-3.
10
Visfatin in human pregnancy: maternal gestational diabetes vis-à-vis neonatal birthweight.人妊娠中的内脂素:母体妊娠期糖尿病与新生儿出生体重。
J Perinat Med. 2009;37(3):218-31. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2009.053.