Rintala A E, Ranta R
Department of Surgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989 Jan;83(1):17-24. doi: 10.1097/00006534-198901000-00004.
A long-term follow-up study of maxillary clefts operated on primarily with the maxillary periosteal flap (67 patients) and the free tibial periosteal graft (23 patients) showed a definite bone bridge in 64 versus 85 percent of the patients. Still, secondary bone grafting was indicated in both in over 70 percent. Lateral crossbite was observed in all and anterior crossbite (mostly dental) was seen in over 80 percent of both groups. There were no statistically significant differences in the cephalometric angular measurements between the groups. Inside the maxillary periosteal flap group the maxillary growth was more retarded in unilateral and especially bilateral complete clefts than in alveolar clefts only. The maxillary growth seemed to be on average better than in primarily bone-grafted materials. The primary use of periosteum had been abandoned in our unit already in 1974, because it did not fulfill the expectations of prevention of maxillary collapse, lesser need for secondary bone grafting, and better midfacial growth.
一项对主要采用上颌骨骨膜瓣(67例患者)和游离胫骨骨膜移植(23例患者)进行手术的上颌裂患者的长期随访研究显示,分别有64%和85%的患者形成了明确的骨桥。尽管如此,两组中仍有超过70%的患者需要进行二期骨移植。两组患者均出现了侧方反合,超过80%的患者出现了前牙反合(主要为牙性)。两组间的头影测量角度指标无统计学显著差异。在上颌骨骨膜瓣组中,单侧尤其是双侧完全性腭裂患者的上颌骨生长比仅牙槽突裂患者更迟缓。上颌骨生长似乎平均比主要采用骨移植材料的情况要好。1974年我们单位就已经放弃了骨膜的主要应用,因为它未能达到预防上颌骨塌陷、减少二期骨移植需求以及促进面中部更好生长的预期。