Department of Pharmacology, Reims University Hospital, 45 rue Cognacq Jay, 51092 Reims, France.
UMR 5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, CNRS, Claude Bernard Lyon 1 University, 43 bd du 11 novembre 1918, 69622 Villeurbanne, France.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 Oct 1;72(10):2804-2812. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx242.
To investigate the population pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin in patients treated by the subcutaneous (sc) and/or intravenous (iv) route.
Non-linear mixed-effects modelling described teicoplanin concentrations from 98 patients with infection caused by Gram-positive cocci. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to evaluate the probability of target attainment (PTA) of various dosage regimens.
Teicoplanin concentrations were best described by a two-compartment model with clearance predicted by estimated glomerular filtration rate. Estimated absorption rate constant (between-subject variability) was 0.039 h-1 (77%), clearance was 0.305 L/h (28%), central volume was 10.3 L (49%), inter-compartmental clearance was 4.42 L/h (66%) and peripheral volume was 97.4 L (51%). The sc route was associated with lower initial Cmin and AUC (day 3: loading phase) compared with the iv route. This difference appeared to vanish after 14 days, with comparable simulated PTAs based on the Cmin and AUC for all tested dosages (400, 600, 800 and 1000 mg every 12 h). However, a loading dose regimen with five administrations of either 400 or 600 mg was not sufficient to achieve the target Cmin (≥15 mg/L) for both routes. Also, PTAs for higher MIC (≥1.0 mg/L) were poor with all regimens for both routes.
This is the first study examining the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic implications of using the sc route for teicoplanin. Subcutaneous administration is associated with lower Cmin and AUC values after the loading phase compared with iv administration. Therefore, iv administration should be preferred in the first few days of therapy. This study also shows that loading doses of teicoplanin higher than currently recommended should be used to improve PTA.
研究以皮下(sc)和/或静脉内(iv)途径给药的患者中替考拉宁的群体药代动力学。
使用非线性混合效应模型描述了 98 例由革兰阳性球菌引起感染的患者的替考拉宁浓度。进行蒙特卡罗模拟以评估各种剂量方案的目标浓度达标概率(PTA)。
替考拉宁浓度最好用两室模型描述,清除率由估计的肾小球滤过率预测。估计的吸收速率常数(个体间变异性)为 0.039 h-1(77%),清除率为 0.305 L/h(28%),中央容积为 10.3 L(49%),隔室间清除率为 4.42 L/h(66%),外周容积为 97.4 L(51%)。与 iv 途径相比,sc 途径给药时初始 Cmin 和 AUC(第 3 天:负荷期)较低。这种差异在 14 天后似乎消失了,所有测试剂量(每 12 小时 400、600、800 和 1000mg)的 Cmin 和 AUC 的模拟 PTA 相似。然而,对于两种途径,使用 400 或 600mg 的 5 次给药的负荷剂量方案均不足以达到目标 Cmin(≥15mg/L)。此外,对于两种途径,所有方案的更高 MIC(≥1.0mg/L)的 PTA 均较差。
这是第一项研究替考拉宁皮下给药对药代动力学/药效学影响的研究。与 iv 给药相比,负荷期后 sc 给药的 Cmin 和 AUC 值较低。因此,在治疗的最初几天应优先选择 iv 给药。本研究还表明,应使用高于目前推荐的替考拉宁负荷剂量来提高 PTA。