• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

随机对照临床试验:肝切除术与射频消融术治疗早期肝细胞癌的疗效比较。

Randomized clinical trial of hepatic resection versus radiofrequency ablation for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.

Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 2017 Dec;104(13):1775-1784. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10677. Epub 2017 Nov 1.

DOI:10.1002/bjs.10677
PMID:29091283
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hepatic resection and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are treatment options for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Whether tumour recurrence and long-term survival favour either treatment has not been established. This randomized trial aimed to test the hypothesis that RFA is superior to hepatic resection in terms of lower tumour recurrence rate and better long-term survival.

METHODS

Patients with early-stage HCC (solitary tumour no larger than 5 cm; or no more than 3 tumours, each 3 cm or smaller) were randomized into hepatic resection and RFA groups. Demographic and clinical characteristics, and short- and long-term outcome measures were compared between groups. Primary and secondary outcome measures were overall tumour recurrence and survival respectively.

RESULTS

Clinicopathological data were similar in the two groups, which each contained 109 patients. The RFA group had a shorter treatment duration, less blood loss and shorter hospital stay than the resection group. Mortality and morbidity rates were similar in the two groups. The overall tumour recurrence rate was similar in the resection and RFA groups (71·3 versus 81·7 per cent respectively). The 1-, 3-, 5- and 10-year overall survival rates were 94·5, 80·6, 66·5 and 47·6 per cent respectively in the resection group, compared with 95·4, 82·3, 66·4 and 41·8 per cent in the RFA group (P = 0·531). Corresponding disease-free survival rates were 74·1, 50·9, 41·5 and 31·9 per cent in the resection group, and 70·6, 46·6, 33·6 and 18·6 per cent in the RFA group (P = 0·072).

CONCLUSION

RFA for early-stage HCC is not superior to hepatic resection, in terms of tumour recurrence, overall survival and disease-free survival. Registration number: HKUCTR-10 (http://www.hkuctr.com).

摘要

背景

肝切除术和射频消融术(RFA)是治疗早期肝细胞癌(HCC)的选择。尚未确定肿瘤复发和长期生存情况是否有利于任何一种治疗。这项随机试验旨在检验 RFA 在肿瘤复发率较低和长期生存情况较好方面优于肝切除术的假设。

方法

将早期 HCC(单发肿瘤不超过 5cm;或不超过 3 个肿瘤,每个肿瘤 3cm 或更小)患者随机分为肝切除术和 RFA 组。比较两组患者的人口统计学和临床特征以及短期和长期预后指标。主要和次要预后指标分别为总体肿瘤复发和生存情况。

结果

两组患者的临床病理数据相似,每组均包含 109 例患者。RFA 组的治疗时间更短,出血量更少,住院时间更短。两组的死亡率和发病率相似。两组的总体肿瘤复发率相似(分别为 71.3%和 81.7%)。肝切除术组的 1、3、5 和 10 年总生存率分别为 94.5%、80.6%、66.5%和 47.6%,RFA 组分别为 95.4%、82.3%、66.4%和 41.8%(P=0.531)。相应的无病生存率分别为肝切除术组 74.1%、50.9%、41.5%和 31.9%,RFA 组 70.6%、46.6%、33.6%和 18.6%(P=0.072)。

结论

对于早期 HCC,RFA 并不优于肝切除术,在肿瘤复发、总体生存和无病生存方面均无优势。注册号:HKUCTR-10(http://www.hkuctr.com)。

相似文献

1
Randomized clinical trial of hepatic resection versus radiofrequency ablation for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma.随机对照临床试验:肝切除术与射频消融术治疗早期肝细胞癌的疗效比较。
Br J Surg. 2017 Dec;104(13):1775-1784. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10677. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
2
Radiofrequency ablation as an alternative to hepatic resection for single small hepatocellular carcinomas.射频消融治疗单个小肝癌可作为肝切除术的替代方法。
Br J Surg. 2016 Jan;103(1):126-35. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9960. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
3
A randomized controlled trial of radiofrequency ablation and surgical resection in the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma.射频消融与手术切除治疗小肝癌的随机对照研究。
J Hepatol. 2012 Oct;57(4):794-802. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.05.007. Epub 2012 May 23.
4
Liver resection and radiofrequency ablation of very early hepatocellular carcinoma cases (single nodule <2 cm): a single-center study.肝切除术和射频消融治疗极早期肝细胞癌病例(单个结节<2cm):单中心研究。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Mar;26(3):339-44. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000012.
5
Surgical resection versus radiofrequency ablation for small hepatocellular carcinomas within the Milan criteria.米兰标准内小肝细胞癌的手术切除与射频消融治疗对比
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2009;16(3):359-66. doi: 10.1007/s00534-009-0069-7. Epub 2009 Mar 20.
6
Comparison of long-term effectiveness and complications of radiofrequency ablation with hepatectomy for small hepatocellular carcinoma.射频消融与肝切除术治疗小肝细胞癌的长期疗效和并发症比较。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Jan;29(1):193-200. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12441.
7
Radiofrequency ablation versus resection for the treatment of early stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter Australian study.射频消融与手术切除治疗早期肝细胞癌:一项澳大利亚多中心研究
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2015 May;50(5):567-76. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2014.953572. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
8
Randomized clinical trial of chemoembolization plus radiofrequency ablation versus partial hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria.随机临床试验:化疗栓塞联合射频消融与肝部分切除术治疗米兰标准范围内的肝细胞癌。
Br J Surg. 2016 Mar;103(4):348-56. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10061. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
9
Radiofrequency ablation versus hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria--a comparative study.射频消融与肝切除术治疗米兰标准内肝细胞癌的比较研究。
Int J Surg. 2013;11(1):77-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2012.11.019. Epub 2012 Dec 6.
10
[The comparative results of radiofrequency ablation versus surgical resection for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma].[射频消融与手术切除治疗肝细胞癌的对比结果]
Korean J Hepatol. 2005 Mar;11(1):59-71.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Clonorchis sinensis infection on long-term survival after curative resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter cohort study.华支睾吸虫感染对肝细胞癌根治性切除术后长期生存的影响:一项多中心队列研究。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2025 Sep 4;19(9):e0013441. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0013441. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Efficacy and safety of D-TACE followed by D-RFA for unresectable large hepatocellular carcinoma.经动脉化疗栓塞术(D-TACE)联合射频消融术(D-RFA)治疗不可切除性大肝细胞癌的疗效与安全性
Front Oncol. 2025 Jul 28;15:1530951. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1530951. eCollection 2025.
3
Report from the 26th Annual Western Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference on Hepatocellular and Biliary Tract Cancer, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, 17-18 October 2024.
第26届加拿大西部胃肠癌肝细胞癌和胆管癌年度共识会议报告,萨斯喀彻温省萨斯卡通,2024年10月17 - 18日。
Curr Oncol. 2025 Jul 10;32(7):398. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32070398.
4
Navigating the evidence for hepatocellular carcinoma treatment: Surgery radiofrequency ablation through sentiment and meta-analysis.通过情感分析和荟萃分析梳理肝细胞癌治疗的证据:手术与射频消融
World J Clin Oncol. 2025 May 24;16(5):105881. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v16.i5.105881.
5
Spot Scanning Proton Beam Therapy for Surgery-inaccessible Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Preliminary Results.针对手术无法切除的肝细胞癌的点扫描质子束治疗:初步结果
In Vivo. 2025 May-Jun;39(3):1654-1660. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13966.
6
Surgery or Percutaneous Ablation for Liver Tumors? The Key Points Are: When, Where, and How Large.肝肿瘤的手术治疗还是经皮消融治疗?关键在于:时机、部位和肿瘤大小。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Apr 16;17(8):1344. doi: 10.3390/cancers17081344.
7
Advances in radiation therapy for HCC: Integration with liver-directed treatments.肝细胞癌放射治疗的进展:与肝脏定向治疗的整合。
Hepatol Commun. 2025 Mar 21;9(4). doi: 10.1097/HC9.0000000000000653. eCollection 2025 Apr 1.
8
Lasso-Based Nomogram for Predicting Early Recurrence Following Radical Resection in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.基于套索法的列线图预测肝细胞癌根治性切除术后早期复发情况
J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2025 Mar 12;12:539-552. doi: 10.2147/JHC.S510581. eCollection 2025.
9
Liver resection in patients with a history of local ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma has the risk of poor survival and serosal invasion.有肝细胞癌局部消融病史的患者进行肝切除存在生存不良和浆膜侵犯的风险。
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2024 Nov 18;9(2):347-358. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12872. eCollection 2025 Mar.
10
Overall survival is comparable between percutaneous radiofrequency ablation and liver resection as first-line therapies for solitary 3-5 cm hepatocellular carcinoma.对于直径3至5厘米的孤立性肝细胞癌,经皮射频消融术和肝切除术作为一线治疗方法,其总生存率相当。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 Feb 12;410(1):66. doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03632-9.