Elhakeem Ahmed, Cooper Rachel, Bann David, Kuh Diana, Hardy Rebecca
MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing, University College London, London, UK.
Musculoskeletal Research Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 1;7(10):e017407. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017407.
We aimed to examine associations between markers of pubertal timing and leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) from ages 36 to 68 years in men and women from the Medical Research Council National Survey of Health and Development.
Pubertal timing was ascertained by physicians at age 14-15 years. Boys were grouped, based on their secondary sexual characteristics, as prepubescent, in early-stage puberty, advanced stage puberty or fully mature at age 14-15 years. Girls were grouped as reaching menarche ≤11, 12, 13 or ≥14 years. LTPA was reported at ages 36, 43, 53, 60-64 and 68 years and classified as active or inactive at each age. Associations were examined using standard and mixed-effects logistic regression models.
Of 5362 singleton births recruited, 1499 men and 1409 women had at least one measure of LTPA and data on pubertal timing and selected covariates. When compared with men that were fully mature at age 14-15 years, those that were in advanced stage and early-stage puberty, but not the prepubescent stage, had lower likelihood of LTPA at younger but not older adult ages (p=0.06 for pubertal status-by-age at LTPA interaction in mixed-effects model). For example, fully adjusted ORs of LTPA (vs no LTPA) at ages 36 and 68 years, respectively, for advanced puberty versus fully mature were 0.69 (95% CIs 0.50 to 0.96) and 1.03 (0.72 to 1.47). Age at menarche was not associated with LTPA at any age (p with age at LTPA=0.9). For example, OR (from mixed-effects model) of LTPA between 36 and 68 years was 1.23 (0.93, 1.63) for menarche at 13 vs ≤11 years.
In a nationally representative study, there was little evidence to suggest that pubertal timing was an important correlate of LTPA between ages 36 and 68 years. Maturity-related variations in adolescents' LTPA may be transitory and lose importance over time.
我们旨在研究医学研究理事会全国健康与发展调查中36至68岁男性和女性青春期发育时间标志物与休闲体育活动(LTPA)之间的关联。
青春期发育时间由医生在14至15岁时确定。男孩根据其第二性征在14至15岁时分为青春期前、青春期早期、青春期晚期或完全成熟。女孩根据月经初潮年龄分为≤11岁、12岁、13岁或≥14岁。在36岁、43岁、53岁、60至64岁和68岁时报告LTPA情况,并将每个年龄段的LTPA分为活跃或不活跃。使用标准和混合效应逻辑回归模型检验关联。
在招募的5362例单胎出生者中,1499名男性和1409名女性至少有一项LTPA测量值以及青春期发育时间和选定协变量的数据。与14至15岁时完全成熟的男性相比,处于青春期晚期和早期但非青春期前阶段的男性在较年轻但非较年长的成年年龄有较低的LTPA可能性(混合效应模型中LTPA年龄与青春期状态交互作用的p=0.06)。例如,青春期晚期与完全成熟相比,36岁和68岁时LTPA(与无LTPA相比)的完全调整优势比分别为0.69(95%可信区间0.50至0.96)和1.03(0.72至1.47)。月经初潮年龄在任何年龄都与LTPA无关(LTPA年龄的p=0.9)。例如,13岁月经初潮与≤11岁月经初潮相比,36至68岁时LTPA的优势比(来自混合效应模型)为1.23(0.93,1.63)。
在一项具有全国代表性的研究中,几乎没有证据表明青春期发育时间是36至68岁之间LTPA的重要相关因素。青少年LTPA中与成熟相关的差异可能是暂时的,且随着时间推移重要性降低。