• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型口腔患者自控镇痛技术(该装置)用于术后疼痛住院患者的试点可行性研究的临床评估

Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Technology for Oral Patient-Controlled Analgesia, the Device, for Hospitalized Patients with Postoperative Pain, in Pilot Feasibility Study.

作者信息

Wirz Stefan, Conrad Stefan, Shtrichman Ronit, Schimo Kai, Hoffmann Eva

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Medicine, Pain Medicine/Palliative Medicine, Center for Pain Medicine, CURA Hospital GFO, Bad Honnef, Germany.

DosentRx Ltd., 2 Hahar St., Har Tuv Industrial Zone A, 9980101 Har Tuv, Israel.

出版信息

Pain Res Manag. 2017;2017:7962135. doi: 10.1155/2017/7962135. Epub 2017 Sep 28.

DOI:10.1155/2017/7962135
PMID:29093632
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5637857/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acute postoperative pain delays recovery and increases morbidity and mortality. Traditional administration of postoperative analgesics by nurses is often inefficient. The present study evaluated the safety, efficacy, and usability of a novel, patient-controlled analgesic dispenser, the PCoA Acute.

METHODS

A controlled pilot study was conducted at three medical centers. Patients scheduled for elective surgery were enrolled into two groups, both taking oral analgesics: a control group ( = 43), opioids dispensed by nurses, and a test group ( = 27), opioids dispensed via the PCoA Acute. Pill intake data were recorded. Pain ratings at rest and during movement were surveyed.

RESULTS

No severe adverse events were recorded. Average pill intake time was reduced from 8 : 58 minutes in the control group to 1 : 17 minutes in the test group ( value < 0.05). The test group took 67% more pills than the control group, indicating enhanced compliance. Pain scores were significantly lower for patients in the test group ( value < 0.05). Over 90% of PCoA Acute users were satisfied with its use.

CONCLUSIONS

The study confirmed that PCoA Acute is safe and effective. It is well accepted by patients and medical staff. Its use can optimize pain medication administration.

摘要

背景

术后急性疼痛会延迟恢复并增加发病率和死亡率。护士传统的术后镇痛药物给药方式往往效率低下。本研究评估了一种新型患者自控镇痛分配器PCoA Acute的安全性、有效性和易用性。

方法

在三个医疗中心进行了一项对照性试点研究。计划进行择期手术的患者被分为两组,两组均服用口服镇痛药:对照组(n = 43),由护士分发阿片类药物;试验组(n = 27),通过PCoA Acute分发阿片类药物。记录服药数据。调查静息和活动时的疼痛评分。

结果

未记录到严重不良事件。平均服药时间从对照组的8∶58分钟减少到试验组的1∶17分钟(P值<0.05)。试验组服用的药丸比对照组多67%,表明依从性提高。试验组患者的疼痛评分显著更低(P值<0.05)。超过90%的PCoA Acute使用者对其使用感到满意。

结论

该研究证实PCoA Acute是安全有效的。它得到了患者和医护人员的广泛认可。其使用可以优化疼痛药物管理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b047/5637857/9b653eaf4a09/PRM2017-7962135.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b047/5637857/1a88ee2d19e6/PRM2017-7962135.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b047/5637857/9b653eaf4a09/PRM2017-7962135.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b047/5637857/1a88ee2d19e6/PRM2017-7962135.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b047/5637857/9b653eaf4a09/PRM2017-7962135.003.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Technology for Oral Patient-Controlled Analgesia, the Device, for Hospitalized Patients with Postoperative Pain, in Pilot Feasibility Study.新型口腔患者自控镇痛技术(该装置)用于术后疼痛住院患者的试点可行性研究的临床评估
Pain Res Manag. 2017;2017:7962135. doi: 10.1155/2017/7962135. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
2
Patient-Controlled Analgesia (PCA): Intravenous Administration (IV-PCA) versus Oral Administration (Oral-PCA) by Using a Novel Device (PCoA® Acute) for Hospitalized Patients with Acute Postoperative Pain-A Comparative Retrospective Study.患者自控镇痛(PCA):使用新型装置(PCoA® Acute)对住院急性术后疼痛患者进行静脉给药(IV-PCA)与口服给药(Oral-PCA)的比较回顾性研究。
Pain Res Manag. 2021 May 4;2021:2542010. doi: 10.1155/2021/2542010. eCollection 2021.
3
Nursing knowledge and beliefs regarding patient-controlled oral analgesia (PCOA).关于患者自控口服镇痛(PCOA)的护理知识与信念。
Pain Manag Nurs. 2013 Dec;14(4):318-326. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2011.07.003. Epub 2011 Oct 6.
4
Patient-controlled oral analgesia for postoperative pain management following total knee replacement.患者自控口服镇痛用于全膝关节置换术后疼痛管理。
Pain Res Manag. 2010 Jan-Feb;15(1):11-6. doi: 10.1155/2010/528092.
5
A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of intravenous ibuprofen 400 and 800 mg every 6 hours in the management of postoperative pain.一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验,研究静脉注射布洛芬 400 和 800 毫克,每 6 小时一次,用于治疗术后疼痛。
Clin Ther. 2009 Sep;31(9):1922-35. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.08.026.
6
Patient-controlled analgesia with lornoxicam vs. dipyrone for acute postoperative pain relief after septorhinoplasty: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.氯诺昔康与安乃近用于鼻整形术后急性疼痛缓解的患者自控镇痛:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2008 Mar;25(3):177-82. doi: 10.1017/S0265021507002827. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
7
Multimodal analgesia with ropivacaine wound infiltration and intravenous flurbiprofen axetil provides enhanced analgesic effects after radical thyroidectomy: a randomized controlled trial.罗哌卡因伤口浸润联合静脉注射氟比洛芬酯多模式镇痛可增强甲状腺癌根治术后的镇痛效果:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Aug 31;19(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0835-2.
8
The effectiveness of an oral opioid rescue medication algorithm for postoperative pain management compared to PCIA : A cohort analysis.口服阿片类药物解救药物方案与 PCIA 用于术后疼痛管理的效果比较:队列分析。
Anaesthesist. 2020 Sep;69(9):639-648. doi: 10.1007/s00101-020-00806-6. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
9
Stratified pain management counseling and implementation improving patient satisfaction: a prospective, pilot study.分层疼痛管理咨询和实施改善患者满意度:一项前瞻性、试点研究。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2019 Dec 5;132(23):2812-2819. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000540.
10
Randomized, double-blind comparison of patient-controlled epidural infusion vs nurse-administered epidural infusion for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing colonic resection.结肠切除术后患者自控硬膜外输注与护士管理硬膜外输注用于术后镇痛的随机双盲比较。
Br J Anaesth. 2007 Mar;98(3):380-4. doi: 10.1093/bja/ael367. Epub 2007 Feb 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimizing CFTR modulator therapy management for cystic fibrosis through the ReX platform.通过ReX平台优化囊性纤维化的CFTR调节剂治疗管理。
Front Pediatr. 2023 Dec 19;11:1300968. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1300968. eCollection 2023.
2
Patient-Controlled Analgesia (PCA): Intravenous Administration (IV-PCA) versus Oral Administration (Oral-PCA) by Using a Novel Device (PCoA® Acute) for Hospitalized Patients with Acute Postoperative Pain-A Comparative Retrospective Study.患者自控镇痛(PCA):使用新型装置(PCoA® Acute)对住院急性术后疼痛患者进行静脉给药(IV-PCA)与口服给药(Oral-PCA)的比较回顾性研究。
Pain Res Manag. 2021 May 4;2021:2542010. doi: 10.1155/2021/2542010. eCollection 2021.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Evolution of Patient-Controlled Analgesia: From Intravenous to Sublingual Treatment.患者自控镇痛的演变:从静脉给药到舌下给药治疗
Hosp Pharm. 2016 Mar;51(3):214-229. doi: 10.1310/hpj5103-214. Epub 2016 Mar 1.
2
Sufentanil sublingual tablet system for the management of postoperative pain.用于管理术后疼痛的舒芬太尼舌下片系统
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2016 Dec;17(17):2351-2357. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2016.1254190.
3
Management of Postoperative Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American Pain Society, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists' Committee on Regional Anesthesia, Executive Committee, and Administrative Council.
The Impact of Patient Interactive Systems on the Management of Pain in an Inpatient Hospital Setting: A Systematic Review.
患者互动系统对住院环境下疼痛管理的影响:系统评价。
Appl Clin Inform. 2019 Aug;10(4):580-596. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1694002. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
4
Use of a Digital Medication Management System for Effective Assessment and Enhancement of Patient Adherence to Therapy (ReX): Feasibility Study.使用数字药物管理系统进行有效评估并提高患者治疗依从性(ReX):可行性研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2018 Nov 26;5(4):e10128. doi: 10.2196/10128.
术后疼痛管理:美国疼痛学会、美国区域麻醉与疼痛医学学会以及美国麻醉医师协会区域麻醉委员会、执行委员会和行政委员会的临床实践指南
J Pain. 2016 Feb;17(2):131-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.12.008.
4
Sufentanil sublingual tablet system vs. intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with morphine for postoperative pain control: a randomized, active-comparator trial.舒芬太尼舌下片系统与静脉注射吗啡患者自控镇痛用于术后疼痛控制的比较:一项随机、活性对照试验。
Pain Pract. 2014 Nov;14(8):679-88. doi: 10.1111/papr.12238. Epub 2014 Aug 25.
5
The traditional method of oral as-needed pain medication delivery compared to an oral patient-controlled analgesia device following total knee arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术后,将口服按需止痛药物的传统方法与口服患者自控镇痛装置进行比较。
Orthop Nurs. 2014 Jul-Aug;33(4):217-23: 224-5. doi: 10.1097/NOR.0000000000000065.
6
Postoperative pain control.术后疼痛控制
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2013 Sep;26(3):191-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1351138.
7
Nursing time study for the administration of a PRN oral analgesic on an orthopedic postoperative unit.骨科术后病房按需口服镇痛药给药的护理时间研究。
Pain Manag Nurs. 2014 Sep;15(3):603-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2013.04.002. Epub 2013 Jun 5.
8
Clinical aspects of acute post-operative pain management & its assessment.急性术后疼痛管理的临床方面及其评估。
J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2010 Apr;1(2):97-108.
9
Recent advances in postoperative pain management.术后疼痛管理的最新进展。
Yale J Biol Med. 2010 Mar;83(1):11-25.
10
Technology solutions can make nursing care safer and more efficient.技术解决方案可以使护理更安全、更高效。
J Healthc Inf Manag. 2008 Fall;22(4):24-30.