Fusco Roberta, Sansone Mario, Granata Vincenza, Setola Sergio Venanzio, Petrillo Antonella
Radiology Unit, "Dipartimento di supporto ai percorsi oncologici Area Diagnostica, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale", Via Mariano Semmola, Naples, Italy.
Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Technologies, University "Federico II" of Naples, Via Claudio, Naples, Italy.
Infect Agent Cancer. 2017 Oct 30;12:57. doi: 10.1186/s13027-017-0168-z. eCollection 2017.
Literature data suggest that multi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), including morphologic T2-weigthed images (T2-MRI) and functional approaches such as Dynamic Contrast Enhanced-MRI (DCE-MRI), Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI) and Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopic Imaging (MRSI), give an added value in the prostate cancer localization and local staging.
We performed a systematic review of literature about the role and the potentiality of morphological and functional MRI in prostate cancer, also in a multimodal / multiparametric approach, and we reported the diagnostic accuracy results for different imaging modalities and for different MR coil settings: endorectal coil (ERC) and phased array coil (PAC). Forest plots and receiver operating characteristic curves were performed. Risk of bias and the applicability at study level were calculated.
Thirty three papers were identified for the systematic review. Sensitivity and specificity values were, respectively, for T2-MRI of 75% and of 60%, for DCE-MRI of 80% and of 72%, for MRSI of 89% and of 69%, for combined T2-MRI and DCE-MRI of 87% and of 46%, for combined T2-MRI and MRSI of 79% and of 57%, for combined T2-MRI, DWI and DCE-MRI of 81% and of 84%, and for combined MRSI and DCE-MRI of 83% and of 83%. For MRI studies performed with ERC we obtained a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 81% and of 66% while the pooled values for MRI studies performed with PAC were of 78% and of 64%, respectively (p>0.05 at McNemar test). No studies were excluded from the analysis based on the quality assessment.
ERC use yielded no additional benefit in terms of prostate cancer detection accuracy compared to multi-channel PAC use (71% versus 68%) while the use of additional functional imaging techniques (DCE-MRI, DWI and MRSI) in a multiparametric MRI protocol improves the accuracy of prostate cancer detection allowing both the early cure and the guidance of biopsy.
文献数据表明,多参数磁共振成像(MRI),包括形态学T2加权成像(T2-MRI)以及动态对比增强MRI(DCE-MRI)、扩散加权成像(DWI)和磁共振波谱成像(MRSI)等功能成像方法,在前列腺癌的定位和局部分期方面具有附加价值。
我们对关于形态学和功能MRI在前列腺癌中的作用及潜力的文献进行了系统综述,包括多模态/多参数方法,并报告了不同成像方式以及不同MR线圈设置(直肠内线圈(ERC)和相控阵线圈(PAC))的诊断准确性结果。绘制了森林图和受试者工作特征曲线。计算了研究水平的偏倚风险和适用性。
共确定33篇论文用于系统综述。T2-MRI的敏感性和特异性值分别为75%和60%,DCE-MRI为80%和72%,MRSI为89%和69%,T2-MRI与DCE-MRI联合为87%和46%,T2-MRI与MRSI联合为79%和57%,T2-MRI、DWI与DCE-MRI联合为81%和84%,MRSI与DCE-MRI联合为83%和83%。对于使用ERC进行的MRI研究,我们获得的合并敏感性和特异性分别为81%和66%,而使用PAC进行的MRI研究的合并值分别为78%和64%(McNemar检验p>0.05)。基于质量评估,分析中未排除任何研究。
与使用多通道PAC相比,使用ERC在前列腺癌检测准确性方面没有额外益处(71%对68%),而在多参数MRI方案中使用额外的功能成像技术(DCE-MRI、DWI和MRSI)可提高前列腺癌检测的准确性,从而实现早期治愈和活检引导。