Suppr超能文献

服务使用者对精神卫生领域强制治疗与约束措施的看法。

Service user perspectives on coercion and restraint in mental health.

作者信息

Rose Diana, Perry Emma, Rae Sarah, Good Naomi

机构信息

Professor of User-Led Research and Co-director of Service User Research Enterprise (SURE), King's College London, UK; email

Research Project Coordinator, National Survivor User Network (NSUN), UK.

出版信息

BJPsych Int. 2017 Aug 1;14(3):59-61. doi: 10.1192/s2056474000001914. eCollection 2017 Aug.

Abstract

Coercion remains a central aspect of many people's mental healthcare. It can include the use of legislation to restrict freedoms, the use of physical restraint, the restriction of freedom of movement and/or association, and the forced or covert administration of medication. There is good evidence that the use of such measures can traumatise service users. This article reports the findings of a survey of service users regarding their experiences of coercion and restraint and embeds this in the wider international and institutional environment.

摘要

强制手段仍是许多人心理保健的核心问题。它可能包括利用立法来限制自由、使用身体约束、限制行动和/或结社自由,以及强制或秘密给药。有充分证据表明,使用这些措施会给服务使用者造成创伤。本文报告了一项针对服务使用者关于其强制和约束经历的调查结果,并将其置于更广泛的国际和机构环境中进行探讨。

相似文献

6
Coercion in psychiatry: the importance of extramural factors.精神病学中的强制手段:院外因素的重要性。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2016 Nov;70(8):606-10. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2016.1190401. Epub 2016 Jun 10.

引用本文的文献

6
Freedom Restrictive Coercive Measures in Forensic Psychiatry.法医精神病学中的自由限制与强制手段
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Mar 5;11:146. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00146. eCollection 2020.
8
Reducing coercion in mental healthcare.减少精神卫生保健中的强制手段。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2019 Dec;28(6):605-612. doi: 10.1017/S2045796019000350. Epub 2019 Jul 9.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验