Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
Department of Urology and Urologic Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:2176471. doi: 10.1155/2017/2176471. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
To evaluate transrectal (TR) and transperineal (TP) approaches for MRI/ultrasound (MRI/US) fusion-guided biopsy to detect prostate cancer (PCa).
154 men underwent multiparametric MRI and MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy between July 2012 and October 2016. 79/154 patients were biopsied with a TR approach and 75/154 with a TP approach. MRI was retrospectively analyzed according to PI-RADS version 2. PI-RADS scores were compared with histopathological results. Descriptive statistics, accuracy, and negative and positive predictive values were calculated. Histopathological results of first, second, and third MRI targeted biopsy cores were compared to evaluate the impact of one verus multiple targeted cores.
Detection rates of PCa were 39% for TR biopsy and 75% for TP biopsy. Sensitivity/specificity for tumor detection with PI-RADS ≥ 4 were 81/69% for TR biopsy and 86/84% for TP biopsy. In 31% for TR biopsy and 19% for TP biopsy, PCa was found in the second or third MRI targeted biopsy core only.
MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy may be conducted with the TR as well as the TP approach with high accuracy, giving more flexibility for diagnosis and the option for focal treatment of PCa.
评估经直肠(TR)和经会阴(TP)途径进行 MRI/超声(MRI/US)融合引导活检以检测前列腺癌(PCa)。
2012 年 7 月至 2016 年 10 月,154 名男性接受了多参数 MRI 和 MRI/US 融合引导活检。79/154 例患者采用 TR 方法进行活检,75/154 例患者采用 TP 方法进行活检。根据 PI-RADS 版本 2 对 MRI 进行回顾性分析。比较 PI-RADS 评分与组织病理学结果。计算描述性统计、准确性、阴性和阳性预测值。比较首次、第二次和第三次 MRI 靶向活检核心的组织病理学结果,以评估一个 versus 多个靶向核心的影响。
TR 活检的 PCa 检出率为 39%,TP 活检为 75%。PI-RADS≥4 时肿瘤检测的灵敏度/特异性为 TR 活检 81/69%,TP 活检 86/84%。TR 活检中 31%,TP 活检中 19%的患者仅在第二次或第三次 MRI 靶向活检核心中发现 PCa。
MRI/US 融合引导活检可采用 TR 及 TP 途径进行,准确性高,为诊断提供更大的灵活性,并为 PCa 的局部治疗提供选择。