Suppr超能文献

呼吸治疗专业教师对跨专业教育的看法:一项横断面在线调查的结果

Respiratory therapy faculty perspectives on interprofessional education: Findings from a cross-sectional online survey.

作者信息

Vernon Marlo M, Moore Nicole, Mazzoli Andrew, De Leo Gianluca

机构信息

a Department of Clinical and Digital Health Sciences , College of Allied Health Sciences at Augusta University , Augusta , GA , USA.

出版信息

J Interprof Care. 2018 Mar;32(2):235-238. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2017.1389865. Epub 2017 Nov 2.

Abstract

Interprofessional education (IPE) improves collaboration and patient care through joint education between health professions. Respiratory therapy (RT) has not been previously evaluated as participants in IPE. A cross-sectional online survey was distributed to evaluate the opportunities and barriers towards IPE of 874 respiratory therapy faculty with both quantitative measures and open-ended questions. Responses (n = 187) to open-ended questions about the opportunities and barriers to IPE inclusion included only one significant difference between Associate's (n = 121, 64.7%) and Bachelor's faculty (n = 66, 35.3%). Open-ended questions were analyzed using directed content analysis. Two trained independent reviewers examined responses for common categories. Reviewers then collated initial categories into broader categories. Faculty responses indicate the importance of IPE, barriers related to schedule and faculty attitudes, and perceived opportunities for IPE with nursing programs and through increasing simulation training opportunities. The most common barriers identified were faculty attitudes, scheduling and logistics, curriculum requirements, administration, and time. All faculty seemed to perceive similar opportunities and barriers regardless of programme type and are supportive of IPE inclusion within their curriculums.

摘要

跨专业教育(IPE)通过卫生专业之间的联合教育来改善协作和患者护理。呼吸治疗(RT)此前尚未作为IPE的参与者进行评估。我们开展了一项横断面在线调查,以通过定量测量和开放式问题来评估874名呼吸治疗教员参与IPE的机会和障碍。关于纳入IPE的机会和障碍的开放式问题的回复(n = 187)显示,副学士学位教员(n = 121,64.7%)和学士学位教员(n = 66,35.3%)之间仅存在一个显著差异。使用定向内容分析法对开放式问题进行了分析。两名经过培训的独立评审员检查了回复中的常见类别。评审员随后将初始类别整理为更广泛的类别。教员的回复表明了IPE的重要性、与日程安排和教员态度相关的障碍,以及与护理项目开展IPE和通过增加模拟培训机会所感知到的机会。确定的最常见障碍是教员态度、日程安排和后勤、课程要求、管理和时间。无论课程类型如何,所有教员似乎都感知到了相似的机会和障碍,并且支持在其课程中纳入IPE。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验