Khalkhal Fatemeh, Negi Ajay Singh, Harrison James, Stokes Casey D, Morgan David L, Osuji Chinedum O
Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Yale University , New Haven, Connecticut 06511, United States.
Chevron Oronite Company LLC, 100 Chevron Way, Richmond, California 94802, United States.
Langmuir. 2018 Jan 23;34(3):1092-1099. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b03343. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
Maintaining suspension stability by effective particle dispersion in systems with attractive interactions can be accomplished by the addition of dispersants that modify the interparticle potential to provide steric or electrostatic barriers against aggregation. The efficacy of such dispersants is typically considered simply by the modification of suspension rheological properties as a function of the overall added dispersant concentration. However, such considerations do little to reveal the molecular origin of differences in dispersant efficacy because they do not consider differences in surface activity. We combine measured adsorption isotherms with the rheological characterization of the elasticity of colloidal gels formed by particle aggregation to provide a more meaningful assessment of dispersant efficacy. The rheological data show that the dispersants are effective at reducing particle aggregation, whereas, from the adsorption isotherms, they differ considerably in their surface coverage at constant overall concentration. When compared at constant dispersant particle surface coverage, the gel rheology shows marked differences across the different dispersants, as opposed to comparisons at constant overall dispersant concentration in the suspensions. In particular, the power-law volume fraction scaling of gel elasticity at constant coverage reveals clear differences in the critical volume fraction for gel formation for the different dispersants. The most efficacious dispersant is that associated with the largest critical volume fraction for gel formation at a given surface coverage. This work demonstrates the utility of rheological investigations coupled with accurate determinations of surface coverage to better differentiate dispersant performance, which may improve efforts to engineer new dispersant molecules.
通过在具有吸引相互作用的体系中有效分散颗粒来维持悬浮稳定性,可以通过添加分散剂来实现,这些分散剂会改变颗粒间的势能,以提供空间位阻或静电屏障来防止聚集。通常,这类分散剂的功效仅通过悬浮液流变性质随添加的分散剂总浓度的变化来考量。然而,这种考量几乎无法揭示分散剂功效差异的分子根源,因为它们没有考虑表面活性的差异。我们将测得的吸附等温线与通过颗粒聚集形成的胶体凝胶的弹性流变学特征相结合,以更有意义地评估分散剂的功效。流变学数据表明,分散剂在减少颗粒聚集方面是有效的,然而,从吸附等温线来看,在总浓度恒定的情况下,它们的表面覆盖率差异很大。当在恒定的分散剂颗粒表面覆盖率下进行比较时,与在悬浮液中恒定的分散剂总浓度下的比较相反,不同分散剂的凝胶流变学表现出显著差异。特别是,在恒定覆盖率下凝胶弹性的幂律体积分数标度揭示了不同分散剂形成凝胶的临界体积分数存在明显差异。最有效的分散剂是在给定表面覆盖率下与最大凝胶形成临界体积分数相关的分散剂。这项工作证明了流变学研究与准确测定表面覆盖率相结合在更好地区分分散剂性能方面的实用性,这可能有助于改进设计新型分散剂分子的工作。