Hernandez Matthew C, Antiel Ryan M, Balakrishnan Karthik, Zielinski Martin D, Klinkner Denise B
Department of Trauma, Critical Care and General Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Department of Pediatric Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
J Pediatr Surg. 2018 Feb;53(2):352-356. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.10.004. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
Supraglottic airway (SGA) use and outcomes in pediatric trauma are poorly understood. We compared outcomes between patients receiving prehospital SGA versus bag mask ventilation (BVM).
We reviewed pediatric multisystem trauma patients (2005-2016), comparing SGA and BVM. Primary outcome was adequacy of oxygenation and ventilation. Additional measures included tracheostomy, mortality and abbreviated injury scores (AIS).
Ninety patients were included (SGA, n=17 and BVM, n=73). SGA patients displayed increased median head AIS (5 [4-5] vs 2 [0-4], p=0.001) and facial AIS (1 [0-2] vs 0 [0-0], p=0.03). SGA indications were multiple failed intubation attempts (n=12) and multiple failed attempts with poor visualization (n=5). Median intubation attempts were 2 [1-3] whereas BVM patients had none. Compared to BVM, SGA patients demonstrated inadequate oxygenation/ventilation (75% vs 41%), increased tracheostomy rates (31% vs 8.1%), and increased 24-h (38% vs 10.8%) and overall mortality (75% vs 14%) (all p<0.05).
Escalating intubation attempts and severe facial AIS were associated with tracheostomy. Inadequacy of oxygenation/ventilation was more frequent in SGA compared to BVM patients. SGA patients demonstrate poor clinical outcomes; however, SGAs may be necessary in increased craniofacial injury patterns. These factors may be incorporated into a management algorithm to improve definitive airway management after SGA.
声门上气道(SGA)在儿科创伤中的使用情况及预后尚不清楚。我们比较了院前接受SGA的患者与使用面罩球囊通气(BVM)的患者的预后。
我们回顾了2005年至2016年的儿科多系统创伤患者,比较了SGA和BVM。主要结局是氧合和通气是否充分。其他指标包括气管切开术、死亡率和简明损伤评分(AIS)。
共纳入90例患者(SGA组17例,BVM组73例)。SGA组患者头部AIS中位数更高(5[4-5]比2[0-4],p=0.001),面部AIS中位数也更高(1[0-2]比0[0-0],p=0.03)。SGA的适应证为多次插管尝试失败(n=12)和多次尝试但视野不佳(n=5)。SGA组插管尝试中位数为2[1-3]次,而BVM组患者无插管尝试。与BVM组相比,SGA组患者氧合/通气不充分的比例更高(75%比41%),气管切开率更高(31%比8.1%),24小时死亡率更高(38%比10.8%),总体死亡率更高(75%比14%)(所有p<0.05)。
插管尝试次数增加和严重面部AIS与气管切开术相关。与BVM组患者相比,SGA组患者氧合/通气不充分更为常见。SGA组患者临床预后较差;然而,在颅面部损伤模式增加的情况下,SGA可能是必要的。这些因素可纳入管理算法,以改善SGA后的确定性气道管理。