Lu Dan, Ma Estella P-M, Ren Jia, Pu Dai, Yang Hui, Yiu Edwin M-L
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Division of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Voice Research Laboratory, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
J Voice. 2019 Jan;33(1):103-109. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.09.015. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Mandarin (simplified) Chinese version of Voice Activity and Participation Profile (MC-VAPP) in mainland China.
This study enrolled 786 subjects from February 2015 to March 2017, including 456 individuals with voice disorders (dysphonic group) and 330 vocally healthy individuals (nondysphonic group). The internal consistency (Cronbach alpha coefficient), test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]), and differences in the MC-VAPP scores were compared between the two groups. Exploratory factor analysis was performed. The receiver operating characteristic curve and cutoff point were calculated.
The MC-VAPP had a high internal consistency. Cronbach alpha coefficients for the subsection scores were from 0.86 and 0.96, with 0.98 for the total score. Test-retest reliability was high for the total score (ICC = 0.98). The four factors' cumulative contribution was determined to be 74.68%. The dysphonic participants displayed significantly higher total score and subsection scores than the nondysphonic participants (P < 0.001). There were significant differences in total activity limitation scores and the total participation restriction scores between the two groups (P < 0.001). The cutoff point for screening between the two groups was 36.5, with a sensitivity of 76.80% and specificity of 80.30%.
The MC-VAPP is a reliable and valid instrument for the evaluation of voice-related quality of life in Chinese-speaking individuals. It is also recommended that the MC-VAPP would be a useful tool for screening individuals with and without voice disorders based on the cutoff value of 36.5.
本研究旨在评估普通话(简体)中文版嗓音活动与参与概况量表(MC-VAPP)在中国内地的信度和效度。
本研究于2015年2月至2017年3月招募了786名受试者,其中包括456名嗓音障碍患者(嗓音障碍组)和330名嗓音健康个体(非嗓音障碍组)。比较两组的内部一致性(Cronbach α系数)、重测信度(组内相关系数[ICC])以及MC-VAPP评分差异。进行探索性因子分析。计算受试者工作特征曲线及切点。
MC-VAPP具有较高的内部一致性。各子量表得分的Cronbach α系数在0.86至0.96之间,总分的Cronbach α系数为0.98。总分的重测信度较高(ICC = 0.98)。四个因子的累积贡献率为74.68%。嗓音障碍参与者的总分及各子量表得分显著高于非嗓音障碍参与者(P < 0.001)。两组在总活动受限得分和总参与受限得分方面存在显著差异(P < 0.001)。两组间的筛查切点为36.5,敏感性为76.80%,特异性为80.30%。
MC-VAPP是评估华语人群嗓音相关生活质量的可靠且有效的工具。基于36.5的切点值,MC-VAPP也被推荐为筛查有无嗓音障碍个体的有用工具。