School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
Department of Economics, University of Ottawa, Canada.
J Health Econ. 2018 Jan;57:315-331. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2017.06.004. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
The objective of this article is to provide the analyst with the necessary tools that allow for a robust ordering of joint distributions of health and income. We contribute to the literature on the measurement and inference of socioeconomic health inequality in three distinct but complementary ways. First, we provide a formalization of the socioeconomic health inequality-specific ethical principle introduced by Erreygers et al. (2012) . Second, we propose new graphical tools and dominance tests for the identification of robust orderings of joint distributions of income and health associated with this new ethical principle. Finally, based on both pro-poor and pro-extreme ranks ethical principles we address a very important aspect of dominance literature: the inference. To illustrate the empirical relevance of the proposed approach, we compare joint distributions of income and a health-related behavior in the United States in 1997 and 2014.
本文的目的是为分析师提供必要的工具,以对健康和收入的联合分布进行稳健排序。我们以三种不同但互补的方式为健康不平等的测量和推断文献做出了贡献。首先,我们对 Erreygers 等人(2012 年)提出的与社会经济健康不平等相关的具体伦理原则进行了形式化。其次,我们提出了新的图形工具和优势检验,以确定与这一新伦理原则相关的收入和健康联合分布的稳健排序。最后,基于有利于贫困人口和极端贫困人口的等级伦理原则,我们解决了优势文献中的一个非常重要的方面:推断。为了说明所提出方法的实证相关性,我们比较了 1997 年和 2014 年美国收入和与健康相关行为的联合分布。