Division of Cardiovascular Medicine (W.F.F., T.N., M.A.H.)
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine (W.F.F., T.N., M.A.H.).
Circulation. 2018 Jan 30;137(5):480-487. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031907. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
Previous studies found that percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) does not improve outcome compared with medical therapy (MT) in patients with stable coronary artery disease, but PCI was guided by angiography alone. FAME 2 trial (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) compared PCI guided by fractional flow reserve with best MT in patients with stable coronary artery disease to assess clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness.
A total of 888 patients with stable single-vessel or multivessel coronary artery disease with reduced fractional flow reserve were randomly assigned to PCI plus MT (n=447) or MT alone (n=441). Major adverse cardiac events included death, myocardial infarction, and urgent revascularization. Costs were calculated on the basis of resource use and Medicare reimbursement rates. Changes in quality-adjusted life-years were assessed with utilities determined by the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions health survey at baseline and over follow-up.
Major adverse cardiac events at 3 years were significantly lower in the PCI group compared with the MT group (10.1% versus 22.0%; <0.001), primarily as a result of a lower rate of urgent revascularization (4.3% versus 17.2%; <0.001). Death and myocardial infarction were numerically lower in the PCI group (8.3% versus 10.4%; =0.28). Angina was significantly less severe in the PCI group at all follow-up points to 3 years. Mean initial costs were higher in the PCI group ($9944 versus $4440; <0.001) but by 3 years were similar between the 2 groups ($16 792 versus $16 737; =0.94). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for PCI compared with MT was $17 300 per quality-adjusted life-year at 2 years and $1600 per quality-adjusted life-year at 3 years. The above findings were robust in sensitivity analyses.
PCI of lesions with reduced fractional flow reserve improves long-term outcome and is economically attractive compared with MT alone in patients with stable coronary artery disease.
URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01132495.
先前的研究发现,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)并未改善稳定性冠状动脉疾病患者的预后,与药物治疗(MT)相比,但 PCI 仅通过血管造影指导。FAME 2 试验(血流储备分数与多血管评估的血管造影比较)比较了稳定性冠状动脉疾病患者血流储备分数指导的 PCI 与最佳 MT 的临床结果和成本效益。
共有 888 例稳定性单支或多支冠状动脉疾病伴血流储备分数降低的患者被随机分为 PCI+MT(n=447)或 MT 组(n=441)。主要不良心脏事件包括死亡、心肌梗死和紧急血运重建。成本是根据资源使用情况和医疗保险报销率计算的。基于基线和随访期间的欧洲生活质量-5 维健康调查确定的效用来评估质量调整生命年的变化。
与 MT 组相比,PCI 组 3 年时主要不良心脏事件显著降低(10.1%比 22.0%;<0.001),主要是由于紧急血运重建率较低(4.3%比 17.2%;<0.001)。在 PCI 组中,死亡和心肌梗死的发生率略低(8.3%比 10.4%;=0.28)。在所有随访点到 3 年时,心绞痛在 PCI 组中明显较轻。在 PCI 组中,初始费用较高(9944 美元比 4440 美元;<0.001),但在 3 年内两组之间相似(16792 美元比 16737 美元;=0.94)。与 MT 相比,PCI 的增量成本效益比为每质量调整生命年 17300 美元,每质量调整生命年 1600 美元。在敏感性分析中,上述发现是稳健的。
与单独药物治疗相比,在稳定性冠状动脉疾病患者中,通过降低血流储备分数的病变进行 PCI 可改善长期预后,且具有经济吸引力。