Center for Neuroscience and Neurological Recovery, Methodist Rehabilitation Center , Jackson, Mississippi.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2018 Mar 1;124(3):592-603. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00717.2017. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
We examined changes in variability, accuracy, frequency composition, and temporal regularity of force signal from vision-guided to memory-guided force-matching tasks in 17 subacute stroke and 17 age-matched healthy subjects. Subjects performed a unilateral isometric knee extension at 10, 30, and 50% of peak torque [maximum voluntary contraction (MVC)] for 10 s (3 trials each). Visual feedback was removed at the 5-s mark in the first two trials (feedback withdrawal), and 30 s after the second trial the subjects were asked to produce the target force without visual feedback (force recall). The coefficient of variation and constant error were used to quantify force variability and accuracy. Force structure was assessed by the median frequency, relative spectral power in the 0-3-Hz band, and sample entropy of the force signal. At 10% MVC, the force signal in subacute stroke subjects became steadier, more broadband, and temporally more irregular after the withdrawal of visual feedback, with progressively larger error at higher contraction levels. Also, the lack of modulation in the spectral frequency at higher force levels with visual feedback persisted in both the withdrawal and recall conditions. In terms of changes from the visual feedback condition, the feedback withdrawal produced a greater difference between the paretic, nonparetic, and control legs than the force recall. The overall results suggest improvements in force variability and structure from vision- to memory-guided force control in subacute stroke despite decreased accuracy. Different sensory-motor memory retrieval mechanisms seem to be involved in the feedback withdrawal and force recall conditions, which deserves further study. NEW & NOTEWORTHY We demonstrate that in the subacute phase of stroke, force signals during a low-level isometric knee extension become steadier, more broadband in spectral power, and more complex after removal of visual feedback. Larger force errors are produced when recalling target forces than immediately after withdrawing visual feedback. Although visual feedback offers better accuracy, it worsens force variability and structure in subacute stroke. The feedback withdrawal and force recall conditions seem to involve different memory retrieval mechanisms.
我们研究了 17 名亚急性脑卒中患者和 17 名年龄匹配的健康受试者在从视觉引导到记忆引导的力量匹配任务中力量信号的变异性、准确性、频率组成和时间规律性的变化。受试者在 10%、30%和 50%的峰值扭矩[最大自主收缩(MVC)]下进行 10 s 的单侧等长膝关节伸展运动(每个试验 3 次)。在前两个试验的第 5 s 标记时去除视觉反馈(反馈撤回),在第二个试验后 30 s 要求受试者在没有视觉反馈的情况下产生目标力(力回忆)。变异系数和常误用于量化力的变异性和准确性。通过力信号的中值频率、0-3-Hz 频段的相对谱功率和样本熵来评估力结构。在 10%的 MVC 下,在视觉反馈撤回后,亚急性脑卒中患者的力信号变得更加稳定,更宽频,时间上更不规则,在较高的收缩水平上误差逐渐增大。此外,在较高的力水平下,视觉反馈时的频谱频率缺乏调制在撤回和回忆两种情况下都持续存在。从视觉反馈条件的变化来看,与力回忆相比,反馈撤回在患侧、非患侧和健侧之间产生了更大的差异。总体结果表明,尽管准确性降低,但在亚急性脑卒中患者中,从视觉引导到记忆引导的力量控制会改善力量的变异性和结构。在反馈撤回和力回忆条件下,似乎涉及不同的感觉运动记忆检索机制,这值得进一步研究。新的和值得注意的是我们证明,在脑卒中的亚急性期,在去除视觉反馈后,低水平等长膝关节伸展时的力信号变得更加稳定,在频谱功率上更宽频,更复杂。在回忆目标力时产生的力误差比立即撤回视觉反馈时更大。虽然视觉反馈提供了更好的准确性,但它会使亚急性脑卒中患者的力量变异性和结构恶化。反馈撤回和力回忆条件似乎涉及不同的记忆检索机制。