vanHeerde-Hudson Jennifer, Fisher Justin
University College London, UK.
Brunel University, UK.
Party Politics. 2013 Jan;19(1):41-60. doi: 10.1177/1354068810393268. Epub 2011 May 12.
Despite comprehensive reform () and recent review (Phillips Review in 2007) of party finance in Britain, public opinion of party finance remains plagued by perceptions of corruption, undue influence from wealthy donors, carefree and wasteful spending and, more generally, from the perception that there is just 'too much money' in politics. In this article we argue that knowledge of and attitudes to party finance matter, not least because advocates of reform have cited public opinion as evidence for reform. However, because attitudes to party finance are part of a broader attitudinal structure, opinion-led reforms are unlikely to succeed in increasing public confidence. Using data generated from YouGov's online panel (N=2,008), we demonstrate that the public know little of the key provisions regulating party finance and attitudes to party finance can be explained along two underlying dimensions - and . As such, we consider whether parties and politicians should be freed from the constraints of public opinion in reforming party finance.
尽管英国对政党资金进行了全面改革()并在近期进行了审查(2007年的菲利普斯审查),但公众对政党资金的看法仍然受到腐败观念、富有的捐赠者施加的不当影响、随意且浪费的支出的困扰,更普遍的是,公众认为政治中“钱太多了”。在本文中,我们认为对政党资金的了解和态度很重要,尤其是因为改革倡导者将公众舆论作为改革的证据。然而,由于对政党资金的态度是更广泛态度结构的一部分,以舆论为导向的改革不太可能成功提高公众信心。利用舆观在线面板生成的数据(N = 2008),我们证明公众对规范政党资金的关键条款知之甚少,对政党资金的态度可以沿着两个潜在维度来解释——以及。因此,我们思考在改革政党资金时,政党和政治家是否应该摆脱公众舆论的约束。