• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Parties heed (with caution): Public knowledge of and attitudes towards party finance in Britain.各方需注意(谨慎对待):英国公众对政党资金的了解及态度。
Party Politics. 2013 Jan;19(1):41-60. doi: 10.1177/1354068810393268. Epub 2011 May 12.
2
Typologies of Party Finance Systems: A Comparative Study of How Countries Regulate Party Finance and Their Institutional Foundations.政党融资体系类型:各国政党融资监管方式及其制度基础的比较研究。
Elect Law J. 2019 Sep;18(3):243-261. doi: 10.1089/elj.2018.0493. Epub 2019 Sep 11.
3
The political system through a partisan lens: Within-person changes in support for political parties precede political system attitudes.从党派视角看政治体系:个人对政党支持的变化先于对政治体系的态度变化。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2023 Jan;62(1):72-83. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12585. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
4
A comparison of attitudes towards immigrants from the perspective of the political party vote.从政党投票角度对移民态度的比较。
Heliyon. 2023 Feb 27;9(3):e14089. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14089. eCollection 2023 Mar.
5
Would I lie to you? Party affiliation is more important than Brexit in processing political misinformation.我会对你说谎吗?在处理政治错误信息方面,党派归属比英国脱欧更重要。
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Feb 1;10(2):220508. doi: 10.1098/rsos.220508. eCollection 2023 Feb.
6
Public opinion of alcohol industry corporate political activities.公众对酒类行业企业政治活动的看法。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2021 Jun;45(3):283-289. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.13121. Epub 2021 May 24.
7
Understanding Support for Municipal Political Parties: Evidence from Canada.理解对市级政党的支持:来自加拿大的证据。
Urban Aff Rev Thousand Oaks Calif. 2024 Sep;60(5):1382-1410. doi: 10.1177/10780874231224707. Epub 2024 Jan 15.
8
Health care issues in Croatian elections 2005-2010: series of public opinion surveys.2005 - 2010年克罗地亚选举中的医疗保健问题:一系列民意调查
Croat Med J. 2011 Oct 15;52(5):585-92. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2011.52.585.
9
Institutionalization and party resilience in Indonesian electoral democracy.印度尼西亚选举民主中的制度化与政党韧性
Heliyon. 2023 Nov 27;9(12):e22919. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22919. eCollection 2023 Dec.
10
Political Ideology and Stigmatizing Attitudes Toward Depression: The Swedish Case.政治意识形态与抑郁污名化态度:瑞典案例。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019 Jun 1;8(6):365-374. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2019.15.

本文引用的文献

1
The polls-trends: political reform.民意调查趋势:政治改革。
Public Opin Q. 2000 Summer;64(2):206-26.

各方需注意(谨慎对待):英国公众对政党资金的了解及态度。

Parties heed (with caution): Public knowledge of and attitudes towards party finance in Britain.

作者信息

vanHeerde-Hudson Jennifer, Fisher Justin

机构信息

University College London, UK.

Brunel University, UK.

出版信息

Party Politics. 2013 Jan;19(1):41-60. doi: 10.1177/1354068810393268. Epub 2011 May 12.

DOI:10.1177/1354068810393268
PMID:29097904
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5656102/
Abstract

Despite comprehensive reform () and recent review (Phillips Review in 2007) of party finance in Britain, public opinion of party finance remains plagued by perceptions of corruption, undue influence from wealthy donors, carefree and wasteful spending and, more generally, from the perception that there is just 'too much money' in politics. In this article we argue that knowledge of and attitudes to party finance matter, not least because advocates of reform have cited public opinion as evidence for reform. However, because attitudes to party finance are part of a broader attitudinal structure, opinion-led reforms are unlikely to succeed in increasing public confidence. Using data generated from YouGov's online panel (N=2,008), we demonstrate that the public know little of the key provisions regulating party finance and attitudes to party finance can be explained along two underlying dimensions - and . As such, we consider whether parties and politicians should be freed from the constraints of public opinion in reforming party finance.

摘要

尽管英国对政党资金进行了全面改革()并在近期进行了审查(2007年的菲利普斯审查),但公众对政党资金的看法仍然受到腐败观念、富有的捐赠者施加的不当影响、随意且浪费的支出的困扰,更普遍的是,公众认为政治中“钱太多了”。在本文中,我们认为对政党资金的了解和态度很重要,尤其是因为改革倡导者将公众舆论作为改革的证据。然而,由于对政党资金的态度是更广泛态度结构的一部分,以舆论为导向的改革不太可能成功提高公众信心。利用舆观在线面板生成的数据(N = 2008),我们证明公众对规范政党资金的关键条款知之甚少,对政党资金的态度可以沿着两个潜在维度来解释——以及。因此,我们思考在改革政党资金时,政党和政治家是否应该摆脱公众舆论的约束。