• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管(PICC)在接受自体或异基因干细胞移植的儿童中的应用。

Use of peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs) in children receiving autologous or allogeneic stem-cell transplantation.

作者信息

Benvenuti Stefano, Ceresoli Rosanna, Boroni Giovanni, Parolini Filippo, Porta Fulvio, Alberti Daniele

机构信息

1 Department of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital, ASST-Spedali Civili of Brescia, Brescia - Italy.

2 Department of Pediatric Onco-Hematology and BMT, Children's Hospital, ASST-Spedali Civili of Brescia, Brescia - Italy.

出版信息

J Vasc Access. 2018 Mar;19(2):131-136. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000803. Epub 2018 Feb 19.

DOI:10.5301/jva.5000803
PMID:29099537
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of our study was to present our experience with the use of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in pediatric patients receiving autologous or allogenic blood stem-cell transplantation. The insertion of the device in older children does not require general anesthesia and does not require a surgical procedure.

METHODS

From January 2014 to January 2017, 13 PICCs were inserted as a central venous device in 11 pediatric patients submitted to 14 autologous or allogeneic stem-cell transplantation, at the Bone Marrow Transplant Unit of the Children's Hospital of Brescia. The mean age of patients at the time of the procedure was 11.3 years (range 3-18 years). PICCs remained in place for an overall period of 4104 days. All PICCs were positioned by the same specifically trained physician and utilized by nurses of our stem-cell transplant unit.

RESULTS

No insertion-related complications were observed. Late complications were catheter ruptures and line occlusions (1.2 per 1000 PICC days). No rupture or occlusion required removal of the device. No catheter-related venous thrombosis, catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI), accidental removal or permanent lumen occlusion were observed. Indications for catheter removal were completion of therapy (8 patients) and death (2 patients). Three PICCs are currently being used for blood sampling in follow-up patients after transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that PICCs are a safe and effective alternative to conventional central venous catheters even in pediatric patients with high risk of infectious and hemorrhagic complications such as patients receiving stem-cell transplantation.

摘要

引言

我们研究的目的是介绍我们在接受自体或异体造血干细胞移植的儿科患者中使用外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管(PICC)的经验。在大龄儿童中插入该装置不需要全身麻醉,也不需要外科手术。

方法

2014年1月至2017年1月,在布雷西亚儿童医院骨髓移植科,为11例接受14次自体或异体干细胞移植的儿科患者插入了13根PICC作为中心静脉装置。手术时患者的平均年龄为11.3岁(范围3 - 18岁)。PICC总共留置了4104天。所有PICC均由同一位经过专门培训的医生放置,并由我们干细胞移植科的护士使用。

结果

未观察到与插入相关的并发症。晚期并发症为导管破裂和管路堵塞(每1000个PICC日1.2例)。没有破裂或堵塞需要拔除装置。未观察到与导管相关的静脉血栓形成、导管相关血流感染(CRBSI)、意外拔除或永久性管腔堵塞。拔除导管的指征是治疗结束(8例患者)和死亡(2例患者)。目前有3根PICC用于移植后随访患者的采血。

结论

我们的数据表明,即使在有感染和出血并发症高风险的儿科患者(如接受干细胞移植的患者)中,PICC也是传统中心静脉导管的一种安全有效的替代方法。

相似文献

1
Use of peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs) in children receiving autologous or allogeneic stem-cell transplantation.外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管(PICC)在接受自体或异基因干细胞移植的儿童中的应用。
J Vasc Access. 2018 Mar;19(2):131-136. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000803. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
2
Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in the management of oncohematological patients submitted to autologous stem cell transplantation.经外周置入中心静脉导管(PICC)在接受自体造血干细胞移植的肿瘤血液病患者中的应用。
Support Care Cancer. 2013 Feb;21(2):531-5. doi: 10.1007/s00520-012-1554-0. Epub 2012 Aug 4.
3
A prospective, randomized comparison of three different types of valved and non-valved peripherally inserted central catheters.三种不同类型的带瓣膜和不带瓣膜的外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管的前瞻性随机对照研究。
J Vasc Access. 2014 Nov-Dec;15(6):519-23. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000280. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
4
Peripherally inserted central venous catheter for pediatric acute leukemia: A retrospective 11-year single-center experience.儿科急性白血病患者应用外周置入中心静脉导管:一项回顾性的 11 年单中心经验。
J Vasc Access. 2024 Sep;25(5):1635-1642. doi: 10.1177/11297298231185222. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
5
The safety of peripherally inserted central venous catheters in critically ill patients: A retrospective observational study.危重症患者经外周置入中心静脉导管的安全性:一项回顾性观察研究。
J Vasc Access. 2024 Sep;25(5):1479-1485. doi: 10.1177/11297298231169059. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
6
Evaluation of PICC complications in orthopedic inpatients with bone infection for long-term intravenous antibiotics therapy.骨科骨感染住院患者长期静脉应用抗生素治疗中经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管并发症的评估
J Vasc Access. 2015 Jul-Aug;16(4):299-308. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000389. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
7
A comparison of Broviac and peripherally inserted central catheters in children with intestinal failure.肠衰竭患儿中 Broviac 导管与外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管的比较。
J Pediatr Surg. 2017 May;52(5):768-771. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.01.036. Epub 2017 Jan 29.
8
Are cuffed peripherally inserted central catheters superior to uncuffed peripherally inserted central catheters? A retrospective review in a tertiary pediatric center.带囊外周静脉置入中心导管优于无囊外周静脉置入中心导管吗?三级儿科中心的回顾性研究。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013 Sep;24(9):1316-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2013.03.003. Epub 2013 May 3.
9
Peripherally inserted central catheters in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.异基因造血干细胞移植受者的外周置入中心静脉导管。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Sep;28(9):4193-4199. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-05269-z. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
10
Distal Superficial Femoral Vein Cannulation for Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Placement in Infants with Cardiac Disease.在患有心脏病的婴儿中,经股浅静脉远心端置管用于外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管
Congenit Heart Dis. 2016 Dec;11(6):733-740. doi: 10.1111/chd.12398. Epub 2016 Jul 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Accurate tacrolimus monitoring by dual peripherally inserted central catheters in allogeneic HSCT.在异基因造血干细胞移植中通过双腔外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管进行准确的他克莫司监测。
Int J Hematol. 2025 Sep 8. doi: 10.1007/s12185-025-04056-3.