Immuneed AB, Dag Hammarskjölds väg 13a, Uppsala, Sweden; Department of Immunology Genetics and Pathology, Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Rudbeck Laboratory C11 Floor 2, Dag Hammarskjöldsväg 20, 751 85 Uppsala, Sweden.
Department of Immunology Genetics and Pathology, Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Rudbeck Laboratory C11 Floor 2, Dag Hammarskjöldsväg 20, 751 85 Uppsala, Sweden.
Int Immunopharmacol. 2018 Jan;54:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2017.10.021. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
First infusion reactions along with severe anaphylactic responses can occur as a result of systemic administration of therapeutic antibodies. The underlying mechanisms by which monoclonal antibodies induce cytokine release syndrome (CRS) can involve direct agonistic effects via the drug target, or a combination of target-engagement along with innate receptor interactions. Despite the wide variety of pathways and cells that can play a role in CRS, many currently used assays are devoid of one or more components that must be present for these responses to occur. One assay that has not been assessed for its capacity to predict CRS is the modified Chandler loop model. Herein we evaluate a plethora of commercially available monoclonal antibodies to evaluate the modified Chandler loop model's potential in CRS prediction. We demonstrate that in a 4-hour loop assay, both the superagonistic antibodies, anti-CD3 (OKT3) and anti-CD28 (ANC28.1), display a clear cytokine response with a mixed adaptive/innate cytokine source. OKT3 induce TNFα and IFN-γ release in 20 out of 23 donors tested, whereas ANC28.1 induce TNF-α, IL-2 and IFN-γ release in all donors tested (n=18-22). On the other hand, non-agonistic antibodies associated with no or low infusion reactions in the clinic, namely cetuximab and natalizumab, neither induce cytokine release nor cause false positive responses. A TGN1412-like antibody also display a clear cytokine release with an adaptive cytokine profile (IFN-γ and IL-2) and all donors (n=9) induce a distinct IL-2 response. Additionally, the value of an intact complement system in the assay is highlighted by the possibility to dissect out the mechanism-of-action of alemtuzumab and rituximab. The loop assay can either complement lymph node-like assays or stand-alone to investigate drug/blood interactions during preclinical development, or for individual safety screening prior to first-in-man clinical trial.
首次输注反应以及严重的过敏反应可能是由于治疗性抗体的全身给药引起的。单克隆抗体诱导细胞因子释放综合征(CRS)的潜在机制可能包括通过药物靶点的直接激动作用,或者靶标结合与固有受体相互作用的组合。尽管在 CRS 中可以发挥作用的途径和细胞种类繁多,但许多目前使用的测定法缺乏这些反应发生所必需的一个或多个组成部分。尚未评估的一种测定法是改良的 Chandler 环模型。在此,我们评估了大量市售的单克隆抗体,以评估改良 Chandler 环模型在 CRS 预测中的潜力。我们证明,在 4 小时的环试验中,两种超激动性抗体,抗 CD3(OKT3)和抗 CD28(ANC28.1),均表现出明显的细胞因子反应,具有混合适应性/固有细胞因子来源。在 23 名供试者中的 20 名中,OKT3 诱导 TNFα 和 IFN-γ 的释放,而 ANC28.1 在所有供试者(n=18-22)中诱导 TNF-α、IL-2 和 IFN-γ 的释放。另一方面,与临床中无或低输注反应相关的非激动性抗体,即西妥昔单抗和那他珠单抗,既不诱导细胞因子释放,也不引起假阳性反应。TGN1412 样抗体也显示出明显的细胞因子释放,具有适应性细胞因子谱(IFN-γ 和 IL-2),所有供试者(n=9)均诱导出独特的 IL-2 反应。此外,通过可能剖析阿仑单抗和利妥昔单抗的作用机制,突出了测定法中完整补体系统的价值。该环试验可补充淋巴结样试验或独立进行,以在临床前开发过程中研究药物/血液相互作用,或在首次人体临床试验之前进行个体安全性筛选。