Department of Management Science, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, 30010, Taiwan, ROC.
Comput Biol Med. 2017 Dec 1;91:191-197. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.10.015. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
Covariate-dependent reference limits have been extensively applied in biology and medicine for determining the substantial magnitude and relative importance of quantitative measurements. Confidence interval and sample size procedures are available for studying regression-based reference limits. However, the existing popular methods employ different technical simplifications and are applicable only in certain limited situations. This paper describes exact confidence intervals of regression-based reference limits and compares the exact approach with the approximate methods under a wide range of model configurations. Using the ratio between the widths of confidence interval and reference interval as the relative precision index, optimal sample size procedures are presented for precise interval estimation under expected ratio and tolerance probability considerations. Simulation results show that the approximate interval methods using normal distribution have inaccurate confidence limits. The exact confidence intervals dominate the approximate procedures in one- and two-sided coverage performance. Unlike the current simplifications, the proposed sample size procedures integrate all key factors including covariate features in the optimization process and are suitable for various regression-based reference limit studies with potentially diverse configurations. The exact interval estimation has theoretical and practical advantages over the approximate methods. The corresponding sample size procedures and computing algorithms are also presented to facilitate the data analysis and research design of regression-based reference limits.
协变量依赖的参考范围在生物学和医学中得到了广泛的应用,用于确定定量测量的实际幅度和相对重要性。已有用于研究基于回归的参考范围的置信区间和样本量程序。然而,现有的流行方法采用了不同的技术简化,并且仅适用于某些有限的情况。本文描述了基于回归的参考范围的精确置信区间,并在广泛的模型配置下比较了精确方法与近似方法。使用置信区间宽度与参考区间宽度之比作为相对精度指标,根据预期比率和容忍概率考虑,提出了用于精确区间估计的最优样本量程序。模拟结果表明,使用正态分布的近似区间方法置信限不准确。在单侧和双侧覆盖性能方面,精确置信区间优于近似方法。与当前的简化方法不同,所提出的样本量程序在优化过程中整合了所有关键因素,包括协变量特征,适用于具有潜在不同配置的各种基于回归的参考范围研究。精确的区间估计比近似方法具有理论和实践优势。还提出了相应的样本量程序和计算算法,以方便基于回归的参考范围的数据分析和研究设计。