Suppr超能文献

中央髋臼撞击症与股骨头和圆韧带损伤有关:髋关节镜治疗髋臼唇撕裂患者的病例对照分析。

Central Acetabular Impingement Is Associated With Femoral Head and Ligamentum Teres Damage: A Cross-Sectional Matched-Pair Analysis of Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for Acetabular Labral Tears.

机构信息

American Hip Institute, Westmont, Illinois, U.S.A.

American Hip Institute, Westmont, Illinois, U.S.A.; Hinsdale Orthopaedics, Westmont, Illinois, U.S.A..

出版信息

Arthroscopy. 2018 Jan;34(1):135-143. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.08.254.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The primary purpose of this study was to report the prevalence of femoral head articular damage in patients with a central acetabular osteophyte (CAO) that was identified during hip arthroscopy and compare it with that in a matched control group without a CAO. A secondary purpose was to identify rates of coexisting intra-articular pathology in both patient groups.

METHODS

Intraoperative data were collected prospectively on all hip arthroscopy patients at our institution between 2008 and 2015. The inclusion criteria for this study were CAOs identified during hip arthroscopy for a labral tear and/or femoroacetabular impingement. The exclusion criteria were Tönnis grade greater than 0, previous hip conditions, and prior surgical interventions. The matched control group was selected based on sex, age ± 5 years, body mass index, and Workers' Compensation claim at a 3:1 ratio and comprised patients who underwent hip arthroscopy for a labral tear and/or femoroacetabular impingement without a CAO. The size and location of labral tears and chondral lesions were recorded in square millimeters with a 5-mm probe and by the clock-face method.

RESULTS

The CAO group consisted of 126 patients, who were matched to 378 patients in the control group. Femoral and acetabular chondral damage grades were significantly different between the 2 groups (P < .001). Of patients with CAOs, 55% had femoral head chondral damage compared with 24% of the control patients. The mean size of femoral chondral damage was 3.2 cm in the CAO group and 1.7 cm in the control group. The mean size of acetabular chondral damage was 1.7 cm in the CAO group and 1.2 cm in the control group. Both femoral and acetabular chondral damage sizes were significantly larger in the CAO group (P ≤ .007). The prevalence of ligamentum teres tears was significantly different between the 2 groups (P < .001). There were no statistically significant differences in the types of labral tears between the 2 groups (P = .625).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that patients with CAOs had a significantly higher prevalence of femoral chondral damage and ligamentum teres tears than matched controls.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, comparative study.

摘要

目的

本研究的主要目的是报告在髋关节镜检查中发现中央髋臼骨赘(CAO)的患者中股骨头关节面损伤的发生率,并与无 CAO 的匹配对照组进行比较。次要目的是确定两组患者中并存的关节内病变的发生率。

方法

本研究纳入了 2008 年至 2015 年在我院接受髋关节镜检查的所有髋关节镜患者的前瞻性术中数据。本研究的纳入标准为髋关节镜检查发现存在髋关节盂唇撕裂和/或股骨髋臼撞击征的 CAO。排除标准为 Tönnis 分级大于 0、既往髋关节疾病和既往手术干预。根据性别、年龄±5 岁、体重指数和工人赔偿要求,以 3:1 的比例选择匹配对照组,该组患者因髋关节盂唇撕裂和/或股骨髋臼撞击征而接受髋关节镜检查,但无 CAO。使用 5mm 探头和时钟面法记录关节唇撕裂和软骨损伤的大小和位置,以平方毫米表示。

结果

CAO 组包括 126 例患者,与对照组的 378 例患者相匹配。两组患者的股骨和髋臼软骨损伤分级差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。在有 CAO 的患者中,55%有股骨头软骨损伤,而对照组患者中这一比例为 24%。CAO 组股骨软骨损伤的平均大小为 3.2cm,对照组为 1.7cm。CAO 组髋臼软骨损伤的平均大小为 1.7cm,对照组为 1.2cm。CAO 组的股骨和髋臼软骨损伤大小均明显大于对照组(P≤0.007)。两组患者的圆韧带撕裂发生率差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。两组患者的关节唇撕裂类型差异无统计学意义(P=0.625)。

结论

本研究表明,与匹配对照组相比,CAO 患者的股骨软骨损伤和圆韧带撕裂发生率明显更高。

证据等级

III 级,比较研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验