Scholarship in the Appropriateness Criteria Process and Updates on Gaps and Harmonization.
作者信息
Rybicki Frank J
出版信息
J Am Coll Radiol. 2017 Nov;14(11S):S381-S382. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.09.005.
PMID:29101978
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Scholarship in the Appropriateness Criteria Process and Updates on Gaps and Harmonization.
J Am Coll Radiol. 2017 Nov;14(11S):S381-S382. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.09.005.
2
A proposed approach for quantitative benefit-risk assessment in diagnostic radiology guideline development: the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria Example.诊断放射学指南制定中定量效益-风险评估的一种提议方法：美国放射学会适宜性标准示例
J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Feb;23(1):128-138. doi: 10.1111/jep.12635. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
3
Introducing the New JACR Appropriateness Criteria Supplement.
J Am Coll Radiol. 2017 May;14(5S):S1. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.03.006.
4
Peer review: should we modify our process?同行评审：我们应该修改我们的流程吗？
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Mar;202(3):463-4. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.12415.
5
The ACR Appropriateness Criteria: view from the committee chair.美国放射学会适宜性标准：委员会主席的观点
J Am Coll Radiol. 2006 Jul;3(7):510-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2006.03.024.
6
[Updates from RöFo].
Rofo. 2015 Mar;187(3):146. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1369611. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
7
Pediatric Radiology editorial board - acknowledgments and updates.
Pediatr Radiol. 2016 Jan;46(1):2-3. doi: 10.1007/s00247-015-3508-4.
8
Evidence-based radiology and the ACR Appropriateness Criteria.循证放射学与美国放射学会适宜性标准
J Am Coll Radiol. 2006 Jul;3(7):505-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2006.03.003.
9
Editor introduction.
Ultrasound Q. 2014 Dec;30(4):259. doi: 10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000128.
10
It's not your father's JACR.这可不是你父亲那个时代的《美国放射学会杂志》了。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2014 Jul;11(7):641. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.05.016.
引用本文的文献
1
Clinical situations for which 3D printing is considered an appropriate representation or extension of data contained in a medical imaging examination: adult cardiac conditions.3D打印被认为是医学影像检查中所含数据的合适呈现或扩展的临床情况：成人心脏疾病。
3D Print Med. 2020 Sep 23;6(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s41205-020-00078-1.
Zotero 插件