• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮经肝胆道内射频消融联合胆道支架置入治疗恶性胆道梗阻的可行性和安全性。

Feasibility and safety of percutaneous transhepatic endobiliary radiofrequency ablation as an adjunct to biliary stenting in malignant biliary obstruction.

机构信息

Osmangazi university faculty of medicine, department of radiology, Eskisehir 26040, Turkey.

出版信息

Diagn Interv Imaging. 2018 Apr;99(4):237-245. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2017.10.002. Epub 2017 Nov 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.diii.2017.10.002
PMID:29102756
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility and safety of percutaneous transhepatic endobiliary radiofrequency ablation (RFA) combined with biliary stenting in palliative treatment of malignant biliary obstructions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-one patients who had undergone percutaneous transhepatic endobiliary RFA as an adjunct to biliary stenting were included. There were 12 men and nine women with a mean age of 67±13.6 (SD) years (range: 34-86 years). Demographic data, procedure details and follow-up data including complications, survival time and stent patency time were documented. The median stent patency time and survival time, as well as the 30- day and 180-day cumulative survival and stent patency rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Twenty-four percutaneous transhepatic endobiliary RFA procedures were performed. There were no procedure-related major complications or death. Three patients who had developed stent reocclusion underwent a second endobiliary RFA, without insertion of a new stent. The most common complications were post-procedural pain and cholangitis. Overall survival and stent patency times ranged between 5-542 days and 5-251 days, respectively. The median survival time was 76 days (95%CI: 0-233 days) and stent patency time was 133 days (95% CI: 25-240 days). The 30- and 180- day cumulative stent patency rates were 75% and 34%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous transhepatic endobiliary RFA is a feasible, safe and cost-effective method in restoration of biliary drainage in patients with malignant biliary obstruction.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨经皮经肝胆道内射频消融(RFA)联合胆道支架置入在恶性胆道梗阻姑息治疗中的可行性和安全性。

材料和方法

共纳入 21 例接受经皮经肝胆道内 RFA 联合胆道支架置入的患者。其中男 12 例,女 9 例,平均年龄 67±13.6(SD)岁(范围:34-86 岁)。记录患者的人口统计学数据、手术细节和随访资料,包括并发症、生存时间和支架通畅时间。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法估计中位支架通畅时间和生存时间,以及 30 天和 180 天的累积生存率和支架通畅率。

结果

共进行了 24 次经皮经肝胆道内 RFA 手术。无与手术相关的严重并发症或死亡。3 例支架再闭塞患者行二次胆道内 RFA,未置入新支架。最常见的并发症是术后疼痛和胆管炎。总生存时间和支架通畅时间为 5-542 天和 5-251 天。中位生存时间为 76 天(95%CI:0-233 天),支架通畅时间为 133 天(95%CI:25-240 天)。30 天和 180 天的累积支架通畅率分别为 75%和 34%。

结论

经皮经肝胆道内射频消融是一种可行、安全且具有成本效益的方法,可恢复恶性胆道梗阻患者的胆道引流。

相似文献

1
Feasibility and safety of percutaneous transhepatic endobiliary radiofrequency ablation as an adjunct to biliary stenting in malignant biliary obstruction.经皮经肝胆道内射频消融联合胆道支架置入治疗恶性胆道梗阻的可行性和安全性。
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2018 Apr;99(4):237-245. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2017.10.002. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
2
Improving biliary stent patency for malignant obstructive jaundice using endobiliary radiofrequency ablation: experience in 150 patients.采用腔内射频消融术改善恶性梗阻性黄疸患者的胆道支架通畅性:150 例患者的经验。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Mar;36(3):1789-1798. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08457-3. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
3
Endobiliary radiofrequency ablation for malignant biliary obstruction.经内镜胆管内射频消融治疗恶性胆管梗阻。
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2013 Aug;12(4):423-7. doi: 10.1016/s1499-3872(13)60066-1.
4
Efficacy and safety of palliative endobiliary radiofrequency ablation using a novel temperature-controlled catheter for malignant biliary stricture: a single-center prospective randomized phase II TRIAL.使用新型温控导管进行姑息性胆管内射频消融治疗恶性胆管狭窄的疗效和安全性:一项单中心前瞻性随机II期试验
Surg Endosc. 2021 Jan;35(1):63-73. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07689-z. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
5
The safety of newly developed automatic temperature-controlled endobiliary radiofrequency ablation system for malignant biliary strictures: A prospective multicenter study.新型自动控温式胆管内射频消融系统治疗恶性胆管狭窄的安全性:一项前瞻性多中心研究。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Aug;34(8):1454-1459. doi: 10.1111/jgh.14657. Epub 2019 Apr 14.
6
Percutaneous intraductal radiofrequency ablation is a safe treatment for malignant biliary obstruction: feasibility and early results.经皮胆管内射频消融术治疗恶性胆道梗阻:可行性和早期结果。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2013 Jun;36(3):814-9. doi: 10.1007/s00270-012-0529-3. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
7
Percutaneous endobiliary ablation of malignant biliary strictures with a novel temperature-controlled radiofrequency ablation device.新型温控射频消融装置经皮腔内胆管消融治疗恶性胆管狭窄。
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2021 Jan;27(1):102-108. doi: 10.5152/dir.2020.20333.
8
Percutaneous biliary covered stent insertion in patients with malignant duodenobiliary obstruction.经皮胆道覆膜支架置入术治疗恶性十二指肠胆管梗阻患者
Acta Radiol. 2015 Feb;56(2):166-73. doi: 10.1177/0284185114523267. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
9
Percutaneous intraductal radiofrequency ablation for clearance of occluded metal stent in malignant biliary obstruction: feasibility and early results.经皮经导管射频消融术清除恶性胆管梗阻中闭塞的金属支架:可行性及早期结果
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2014 Feb;37(1):235-40. doi: 10.1007/s00270-013-0688-x. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
10
Management of occluded self-expanding biliary metal stents in malignant biliary disease.恶性胆道疾病中闭塞自膨式胆道金属支架的处理。
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2018 Feb;17(1):49-54. doi: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2018.01.016. Epub 2018 Jan 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Biliary self-expandable metallic stent combined with iodine-125 seeds in the treatment of malignant biliary obstruction (Bismuth type I or II).胆道自膨式金属支架联合碘 125 粒子治疗恶性胆道梗阻(Bismuth Ⅰ型或Ⅱ型)。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Oct;37(10):7729-7737. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10327-z. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
2
Impact of endobiliary radiofrequency ablation on survival of patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma: a narrative review.胆管内射频消融对不可切除胆管癌患者生存的影响:一项叙述性综述
Front Oncol. 2023 May 30;13:1077794. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1077794. eCollection 2023.
3
Comparing palliative treatment options for cholangiocarcinoma: photodynamic therapy vs. radiofrequency ablation.
胆管癌姑息治疗方案比较:光动力疗法与射频消融术
Clin Endosc. 2022 May;55(3):347-354. doi: 10.5946/ce.2021.274. Epub 2022 May 17.