Civil Engineering, National University of Ireland, Galway, Co. Galway, Ireland; School of Engineering, University of Limerick, Co. Limerick, Ireland.
Teagasc, Johnstown Castle, Environment Research Centre, Co. Wexford, Ireland.
J Environ Manage. 2018 Jan 15;206:398-408. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.10.046. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
This study aimed to quantify leaching losses of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and carbon (C), as well as carbon dioxide (CO) and methane (CH) emissions from stored slurry, and from packed soil columns surface applied with unamended and chemically amended dairy and pig slurries, and dairy soiled water (DSW). The amendments to the slurries, which were applied individually and together, were: polyaluminum chloride (PAC) and zeolite for pig and dairy slurry, and liquid aluminium sulfate (alum) and zeolite for DSW. Application of pig slurry resulted in the highest total nitrogen (TN) and nitrate-nitrogen (NO-N) fluxes (22 and 12 kg ha), whereas corresponding fluxes from dairy slurries and DSW were not significantly (p < 0.05) higher than those from the control soil. There were no significant (p < 0.05) differences in leachate N losses between unamended and amended dairy slurries, unamended and amended pig slurries, and unamended and amended DSW. There were no leachate P losses measured over the experimental duration. Total cumulative organic (TOC) and inorganic C (TIC) losses in leachate were highest for unamended dairy slurry (82 and 142 kg ha), and these were significantly (p < 0.05) reduced when amended with PAC (38 and 104 kg ha). The highest average cumulative CO emissions for all treatments were measured for pig slurries (680 kg CO-C ha) followed by DSW (515 kg CO-C ha) and dairy slurries (486 kg CO-C ha). The results indicate that pig slurry, either in raw or chemically amended form, poses the greatest environmental threat of leaching losses and gaseous emissions of CO and CH and, in general, amendment of wastewater with PAC, alum or zeolite, does not mitigate the risk of these losses.
本研究旨在量化储存的泥浆以及未经处理和经化学处理的奶牛和猪泥浆以及奶牛污水(DSW)表面施用的袋装土壤柱中氮(N)、磷(P)和碳(C)的浸出损失以及二氧化碳(CO)和甲烷(CH)的排放。单独和一起施用的泥浆改良剂为:猪和奶牛泥浆用聚合氯化铝(PAC)和沸石,DSW 用液体硫酸铝(明矾)和沸石。猪泥浆的应用导致总氮(TN)和硝酸盐氮(NO-N)通量最高(22 和 12 kg ha),而来自奶牛泥浆和 DSW 的相应通量没有显著高于对照土壤(p < 0.05)。未经处理和处理的奶牛泥浆、未经处理和处理的猪泥浆以及未经处理和处理的 DSW 之间,淋溶液中 N 的浸出损失没有显著差异(p < 0.05)。在实验期间未测量到淋溶液中 P 的浸出损失。未经处理的奶牛泥浆中总有机(TOC)和无机 C(TIC)的累积损失最高(82 和 142 kg ha),当用 PAC 处理时,这些损失显著降低(38 和 104 kg ha)。所有处理中,猪泥浆的 CO 排放量最高(680 kg CO-C ha),其次是 DSW(515 kg CO-C ha)和奶牛泥浆(486 kg CO-C ha)。结果表明,猪泥浆无论是原始形式还是化学处理形式,都会对淋出损失和 CO 和 CH 的气态排放造成最大的环境威胁,通常,用 PAC、明矾或沸石处理废水并不能减轻这些损失的风险。