Suppr超能文献

临床下背痛指南:对三大主要指南中一致性和不一致性的批判性回顾。

Clinical guidelines for low back pain: A critical review of consensus and inconsistencies across three major guidelines.

机构信息

Health Economics Research Group, Institute of Environment, Health and Societies, Department of Clinical Sciences, Brunel University London, Kingston Lane, Uxbridge, UB8 3PH, United Kingdom.

Department of Orthopaedics, Duke University, 2200 W. Main St. Ste B230, Durham, NC 27705, USA.

出版信息

Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2016 Dec;30(6):968-980. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 Jun 9.

Abstract

Given the scale and cost of the low back pain problem, it is imperative that healthcare professionals involved in the care of people with low back pain have access to up-to-date, evidence-based information to assist them in treatment decision-making. Clinical guidelines exist to promote the consistent best practice, to reduce unwarranted variation and to reduce the use of low-value interventions in patient care. Recent decades have witnessed the publication of a number of such guidelines. In this narrative review, we consider three selected international interdisciplinary guidelines for the management of low back pain. Guideline development methods, consistent recommendations and inconsistencies between these guidelines are critically discussed.

摘要

鉴于下背痛问题的规模和成本,参与下背痛患者护理的医疗保健专业人员必须获得最新的基于证据的信息,以帮助他们做出治疗决策。临床指南的存在是为了促进一致的最佳实践,减少不必要的差异,并减少低价值干预措施在患者护理中的使用。近几十年来,已经发布了许多这样的指南。在这篇叙述性评论中,我们考虑了三种用于管理下背痛的国际跨学科指南。批判性地讨论了指南制定方法、一致的建议以及这些指南之间的不一致。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验