• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

贝洛妥珠单抗对比安慰剂预防复发性艰难梭菌感染的成本效果分析。

Cost-effectiveness of Bezlotoxumab Compared With Placebo for the Prevention of Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection.

机构信息

Merck & Co, Inc, Kenilworth, New Jersey.

Washington University, St Louis, Missouri.

出版信息

Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Jan 18;66(3):355-362. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix809.

DOI:10.1093/cid/cix809
PMID:29106516
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is the most commonly recognized cause of recurrent diarrhea. Bezlotoxumab, administered concurrently with antibiotics directed against C. difficile (standard of care [SoC]), has been shown to reduce the recurrence of CDI, compared with SoC alone. This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of bezlotoxumab administered concurrently with SoC, compared with SoC alone, in subgroups of patients at risk of recurrence of CDI.

METHODS

A computer-based Markov health state transition model was designed to track the natural history of patients infected with CDI. A cohort of patients entered the model with either a mild/moderate or severe CDI episode, and were treated with SoC antibiotics together with either bezlotoxumab or placebo. The cohort was followed over a lifetime horizon, and costs and utilities for the various health states were used to estimate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Both deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were used to test the robustness of the results.

RESULTS

The cost-effectiveness model showed that, compared with placebo, bezlotoxumab was associated with 0.12 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained and was cost-effective in preventing CDI recurrences in the entire trial population, with an ICER of $19824/QALY gained. Compared with placebo, bezlotoxumab was also cost-effective in the subgroups of patients aged ≥65 years (ICER of $15298/QALY), immunocompromised patients (ICER of $12597/QALY), and patients with severe CDI (ICER of $21430/QALY).

CONCLUSIONS

Model-based results demonstrated that bezlotoxumab was cost-effective in the prevention of recurrent CDI compared with placebo, among patients receiving SoC antibiotics for treatment of CDI.

摘要

背景

艰难梭菌感染(CDI)是最常见的复发性腹泻的原因。贝洛妥珠单抗与针对艰难梭菌的抗生素(标准治疗[SoC])同时给药,与单独使用 SoC 相比,已被证明可降低 CDI 的复发率。本研究旨在评估贝洛妥珠单抗与 SoC 联合给药与单独使用 SoC 相比,在 CDI 复发风险较高的患者亚组中的成本效益。

方法

设计了基于计算机的 Markov 健康状态转移模型,以跟踪 CDI 感染患者的自然病史。患者队列进入模型时患有轻度/中度或重度 CDI 发作,并接受 SoC 抗生素联合贝洛妥珠单抗或安慰剂治疗。该队列在终身时间范围内进行随访,各种健康状态的成本和效用用于估计增量成本效益比(ICER)。使用确定性和概率敏感性分析来测试结果的稳健性。

结果

成本效益模型表明,与安慰剂相比,贝洛妥珠单抗可获得 0.12 个质量调整生命年(QALY),并且在预防整个试验人群的 CDI 复发方面具有成本效益,ICER 为每获得 1 QALY 花费 19824 美元。与安慰剂相比,贝洛妥珠单抗在≥65 岁的患者亚组(ICER 为 15298 美元/QALY)、免疫功能低下的患者亚组(ICER 为 12597 美元/QALY)和患有严重 CDI 的患者亚组(ICER 为 21430 美元/QALY)中也具有成本效益。

结论

基于模型的结果表明,与安慰剂相比,贝洛妥珠单抗在接受 SoC 抗生素治疗 CDI 的患者中预防复发性 CDI 具有成本效益。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of Bezlotoxumab Compared With Placebo for the Prevention of Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection.贝洛妥珠单抗对比安慰剂预防复发性艰难梭菌感染的成本效果分析。
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Jan 18;66(3):355-362. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix809.
2
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Bezlotoxumab Added to Standard of Care Versus Standard of Care Alone for the Prevention of Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection in High-Risk Patients in Spain.西班牙高危患者中贝洛妥珠单抗联合标准治疗与标准治疗单用预防复发性艰难梭菌感染的成本-效果分析
Adv Ther. 2018 Nov;35(11):1920-1934. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0813-y. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
3
Cost-effectiveness of three different strategies for the treatment of first recurrent Clostridium difficile infection diagnosed in a community setting.三种不同策略治疗社区环境中首次诊断的复发性艰难梭菌感染的成本效益比较。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018 Aug;39(8):924-930. doi: 10.1017/ice.2018.139. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
4
Cost-effectiveness of bezlotoxumab and fidaxomicin for initial Clostridioides difficile infection.贝洛妥珠单抗和非达霉素治疗初次艰难梭菌感染的成本效益分析。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Oct;27(10):1448-1454. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.04.004. Epub 2021 Apr 17.
5
Bezlotoxumab: A Review in Preventing Clostridium difficile Infection Recurrence.贝洛妥珠单抗:预防艰难梭菌感染复发的研究进展。
Drugs. 2017 Oct;77(15):1657-1663. doi: 10.1007/s40265-017-0809-y.
6
Bezlotoxumab: A Novel Agent for the Prevention of Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection.贝洛妥珠单抗:一种用于预防复发性艰难梭菌感染的新型药物。
Pharmacotherapy. 2017 Oct;37(10):1298-1308. doi: 10.1002/phar.1990. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
7
Bezlotoxumab for Prevention of Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection in Patients at Increased Risk for Recurrence.贝洛妥珠单抗预防高复发风险的复发性艰难梭菌感染。
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Aug 16;67(5):649-656. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy171.
8
The effect of bezlotoxumab for prevention of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in Japanese patients.贝佐妥单抗对日本患者预防艰难梭菌感染(CDI)复发的效果。
J Infect Chemother. 2018 Feb;24(2):123-129. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2017.10.005. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
9
Bezlotoxumab for Prevention of Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection.贝洛妥珠单抗预防复发性艰难梭菌感染。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jan 26;376(4):305-317. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602615.
10
Bezlotoxumab: Could This be the Answer for Clostridium difficile Recurrence?贝佐妥昔单抗:这会是艰难梭菌复发问题的答案吗?
Ann Pharmacother. 2017 Sep;51(9):804-810. doi: 10.1177/1060028017706374. Epub 2017 May 6.

引用本文的文献

1
The evolving landscape of live biotherapeutics in the treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection.用于治疗艰难梭菌感染的活体生物治疗药物的不断演变格局。
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2025 Apr;44(2):129-141. doi: 10.1007/s12664-024-01717-9. Epub 2025 Jan 16.
2
Best Practices in the Management of Infection in Developing Nations.发展中国家感染管理的最佳实践
Trop Med Infect Dis. 2024 Aug 19;9(8):185. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed9080185.
3
Encapsulation protocol for fecal microbiota transplantation.粪便微生物群移植的封装方案。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2024 Jun 26;14:1424376. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1424376. eCollection 2024.
4
Clostridioides Difficile: A Concise Review of Best Practices and Updates.艰难梭菌:最佳实践和更新的简明回顾。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2024 Jan-Dec;15:21501319241249645. doi: 10.1177/21501319241249645.
5
infection: history, epidemiology, risk factors, prevention, clinical manifestations, treatment, and future options.感染:历史、流行病学、风险因素、预防、临床表现、治疗和未来选择。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2024 Jun 13;37(2):e0013523. doi: 10.1128/cmr.00135-23. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
6
Inflammatory bowel disease and infection: clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management.炎症性肠病与感染:临床表现、诊断及管理
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2023 Nov 28;16:17562848231207280. doi: 10.1177/17562848231207280. eCollection 2023.
7
Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection: Current Clinical Management and Microbiome-Based Therapies.复发性艰难梭菌感染:当前的临床管理及基于微生物群的治疗方法
BioDrugs. 2023 Nov;37(6):757-773. doi: 10.1007/s40259-023-00617-2. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
8
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Antimicrobial Prescribing in the Treatment of Clostridioides Difficile Infection in England.英格兰艰难梭菌感染治疗中抗菌药物处方的成本效益分析
Pharmacoecon Open. 2023 Sep;7(5):739-750. doi: 10.1007/s41669-023-00420-3. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
9
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of REBYOTA™ (Fecal Microbiota, Live-jslm [FMBL]) Versus Standard of Care for the Prevention of Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection in the USA.REBYOTA™(粪便微生物群,活体-jslm[FMBL])与标准护理预防美国复发性艰难梭菌感染的成本效益分析。
Adv Ther. 2023 Jun;40(6):2784-2800. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02505-1. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
10
Controversies in the Prevention and Treatment of Infection in Adults: A Narrative Review.成人感染预防与治疗中的争议:一篇叙述性综述
Microorganisms. 2023 Feb 3;11(2):387. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11020387.