Gabree Scott H, Shepard Timothy G, Eskew Rhea T
Department of Psychology, 125-NI, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Department of Psychology, 125-NI, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Vision Res. 2018 Oct;151:61-68. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2017.06.017. Epub 2017 Nov 11.
Physiological, anatomical, and psychophysical evidence points to important differences between visual processing of short-wave cone increments and decrement (S+ and S-) stimuli. The present study uses the pedestal discrimination paradigm to investigate potential differences, using S+ and S- tests presented on (L)ong-wave, (M)edium-wave, S, L+M, L-M, and achromatic pedestals, of both contrast polarities. Results show that high contrast 'purplish' (S+ or -(L+M)) pedestals produce substantially more masking of both S+ and S- tests than 'yellowish' (S- or +(L+M)) pedestals do. The other pedestals produce no masking. These findings suggest greater nonlinearity - either a static nonlinearity or contrast gain control - in the mechanisms responsible for the 'purplish' polarity, likely the S ON pathway.
生理、解剖学和心理物理学证据表明,短波锥体增量和减量(S+和S-)刺激的视觉处理之间存在重要差异。本研究使用基座辨别范式来研究潜在差异,使用在(长波)L、(中波)M、S、L+M、L-M和消色差基座上呈现的具有两种对比度极性的S+和S-测试。结果表明,高对比度的“紫色”(S+或-(L+M))基座比“黄色”(S-或+(L+M))基座对S+和S-测试产生的掩蔽作用要大得多。其他基座不产生掩蔽作用。这些发现表明,在负责“紫色”极性的机制中,可能是S ON通路,存在更大的非线性——要么是静态非线性,要么是对比度增益控制。