Li Juan, Wang Xiaofang, Ma Jinli, Yu Xiaoli, Guo Xiaomao, Zhang Zhen
Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Oncotarget. 2017 Sep 11;8(45):80012-80019. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.20820. eCollection 2017 Oct 3.
To determine whether IMRT could decrease skin toxicities in patients undergoing PMRT of chest wall, supra/infraclavicular (SCV), and internal mammary nodes (IMN) as compared to conventional technique.
Between 2009 and 2013, 106 patients treated with IMRT and 138 treated with conventional technique were followed up regularly. The skin toxicities were graded according to the CTCAE v4.0 issued by the NCI, and compared between groups.
Grade 3 radiation dermatitis occurred in 49 patients (35.5%) in the conventional group and 14 (13.2%) in the IMRT group, and the difference was statistically significant ( < 0.001), favoring IMRT. Moist desquamation at the area associated with adjacent fields' junctions or overlaps was observed in 35 patients (71.4%) in the conventional group and none in the IMRT group ( = 0.023). Grade 2 telangiectasia occurred in 32 patients (23.1%) in the conventional group and 9 (8.5%) in the IMRT group; this difference was statistically significant ( = 0.002), in favor of IMRT as well. Telangiectasias at the sub-sites associated with adjacent fields' junctions or overlaps were observed in 26 patients (81.2%) in the conventional group and none in the IMRT group ( < 0.001). Further, 21 in the conventional group, who had initial moist desquamation at the sub-sites associated with adjacent fields' overlaps or junctions, subsequently developed skin telangiectasias at the identical sub-sites.
IMRT-based post-mastectomy irradiation of chest wall, SCV and IMN might decrease the occurrence of initial moist desquamation as well as subsequent telangiectasia at the subsites associated with adjacent fields' junctions or overlaps as compared to conventional technique.
确定与传统技术相比,调强放疗(IMRT)是否能降低胸壁、锁骨上/下(SCV)及内乳淋巴结(IMN)行术后放疗(PMRT)患者的皮肤毒性。
2009年至2013年期间,对106例行IMRT治疗的患者和138例行传统技术治疗的患者进行定期随访。根据美国国立癌症研究所(NCI)发布的CTCAE v4.0对皮肤毒性进行分级,并在两组间进行比较。
传统组49例患者(35.5%)发生3级放射性皮炎,IMRT组14例患者(13.2%)发生,差异有统计学意义(<0.001),支持IMRT。传统组35例患者(71.4%)在相邻野交界或重叠区域出现湿性脱屑,IMRT组无1例出现(=0.023)。传统组32例患者(23.1%)发生2级毛细血管扩张,IMRT组9例患者(8.5%)发生;该差异有统计学意义(=0.002),同样支持IMRT。传统组26例患者(81.2%)在相邻野交界或重叠子部位出现毛细血管扩张,IMRT组无1例出现(<0.001)。此外,传统组21例最初在相邻野重叠或交界子部位出现湿性脱屑的患者,随后在相同子部位出现皮肤毛细血管扩张。
与传统技术相比,基于IMRT的乳房切除术后胸壁、SCV和IMN放疗可能会降低在相邻野交界或重叠子部位最初湿性脱屑以及随后毛细血管扩张的发生率。