García Ruiz Rafael, Silva Fernández Julia, García Ruiz Rosa María, Recio Bermejo Marta, Arias Arias Ángel, Del Saz Saucedo Pablo, Huertas Arroyo Rafael, González Manero Ana, Santos Pinto Ana, Navarro Muñoz Santiago, Botia Paniagua Enrique, Abellán Alemán José
Department of Neurology, La Mancha-Centro General Hospital, Alcázar de San Juan, Spain; Doctoral Research Program, Universidad Católica de Murcia, Guadalupe, Spain.
Department of Endocrinology, La Mancha-Centro General Hospital, Alcázar de San Juan, Spain.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018 Mar;27(3):625-632. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.09.036. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
Despite recent advances in acute stroke care, reperfusion therapies are given to only 1%-8% of patients. Previous studies have focused on prehospital or decision delay. We aim to give a more comprehensive view by addressing different time delays and decisions.
A total of 382 patients with either acute stroke or transient ischemic attack were prospectively included. Sociodemographic and clinical parameters and data on decision delay, prehospital delay, and first medical contact were recorded. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify factors related to decision delay of 15 minutes or shorter, calling the Extrahospital Emergency Services, and prehospital delay of 60 minutes or shorter and 180 minutes or shorter.
Prehospital delay was 60 minutes or shorter in 11.3% of our patients and 180 minutes or shorter in 48.7%. Major vascular risk factors were present in 89.8% of patients. Severity was associated with decision delay of 15 minutes or shorter (odds ratio [OR] 1.08; confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.13), calling the Extrahospital Emergency Services (OR 1.17; CI 1.12-1.23), and prehospital delay of 180 minutes or shorter (OR 1.08; CI 1.01-1.15). Adult children as witnesses favored a decision delay of 15 minutes or shorter (OR 3.44; CI 95% 1.88-6.27; P < .001) and calling the Extrahospital Emergency Services (OR 2.24; IC 95% 1.20-4.22; P = .012). Calling the Extrahospital Emergency Services favored prehospital delay of 60 minutes or shorter (OR 5.69; CI 95% 2.41-13.45; P < .001) and prehospital delay of 180 minutes or shorter (OR 3.86; CI 95% 1.47-10.11; P = .006).
Severity and the bystander play a critical role in the response to stroke. Calling the Extrahospital Emergency Services promotes shorter delays. Future interventions should encourage immediately calling the Extrahospital Emergency Services, but the target should be redirected to those with known risk factors and their caregivers.
尽管急性中风治疗最近取得了进展,但只有1%-8%的患者接受了再灌注治疗。以往的研究主要集中在院前或决策延迟方面。我们旨在通过研究不同的时间延迟和决策来提供更全面的观点。
前瞻性纳入了382例急性中风或短暂性脑缺血发作患者。记录了社会人口统计学和临床参数以及决策延迟、院前延迟和首次医疗接触的数据。进行多变量逻辑回归分析,以确定与15分钟或更短的决策延迟、呼叫院外急救服务以及60分钟或更短和180分钟或更短的院前延迟相关的因素。
在我们的患者中,11.3%的患者院前延迟为60分钟或更短,48.7%的患者为180分钟或更短。89.8%的患者存在主要血管危险因素。病情严重程度与15分钟或更短的决策延迟(优势比[OR]1.08;置信区间[CI]1.04-1.13)、呼叫院外急救服务(OR 1.17;CI 1.12-1.23)以及180分钟或更短的院前延迟(OR 1.08;CI 1.01-1.15)相关。成年子女作为目击者倾向于15分钟或更短的决策延迟(OR 3.44;CI 95% 1.88-6.27;P<0.001)和呼叫院外急救服务(OR 2.24;IC 95% 1.20-4.22;P = 0.012)。呼叫院外急救服务倾向于60分钟或更短的院前延迟(OR 5.69;CI 95% 2.41-13.45;P<0.001)和180分钟或更短的院前延迟(OR 3.86;CI 95% 1.47-10.11;P = 0.006)。
病情严重程度和旁观者在中风应对中起关键作用。呼叫院外急救服务可缩短延迟时间。未来的干预措施应鼓励立即呼叫院外急救服务,但目标应转向有已知危险因素的患者及其护理人员。